Directed discussion |
A13 B4 B18 B22 C5 |
To be evaluated: Participation in class sessions and virtual forums, with respect to the following criteria: the assignment is completed before the established deadline, the issue is addressed with a depth that demonstrates understanding and support from the external sources consulted, important ideas are well-synthesized, the arguments are creative, they demonstrate an ability to defend, criticize, and evaluate, and the language is clear and correct. |
20 |
Supervised projects |
A4 A5 A6 A11 A14 B1 B2 B5 B14 B18 B19 B20 C1 C5 C6 C7 |
Project proposal
To be evaluated: quality of description and depth of analysis of realities and political and social responses, quality and feasibility of the proposal, degree of support by up-to-date and relevant external references, use of language appropriate for academic and scientific contexts, formal aspects related to the quality of the presentation. |
80 |