Teaching GuideTerm Faculty of Educational Studies |
Grao en Logopedia |
Subjects |
Speech Therapy Intervention in Language Disorders |
Assessment |
Identifying Data | 2019/20 | |||||||||||||
Subject | Speech Therapy Intervention in Language Disorders | Code | 652G04034 | |||||||||||
Study programme |
|
|||||||||||||
Descriptors | Cycle | Period | Year | Type | Credits | |||||||||
Graduate | 1st four-month period |
Fourth | Obligatory | 6 | ||||||||||
|
Methodologies | Competencies / Results | Description | Qualification |
Mixed objective/subjective test | A21 A16 A14 A13 A9 A8 A7 A6 A2 A1 A22 A27 A28 B1 | An exam is to evaluate the theoretical and practical contents developed in the materia. They will be short questions. It's the official exam. | 60 |
Case study | B5 B6 B7 B9 B14 B16 B19 | The student will be evaluated in this section (case studies) in the final exam, through 2 questions related to the programming, evaluation and treatment of the pathologies taught in the subject. . Assessment criteria: reasoning capacity for therapeutic programming and selection of specific exercises. |
30 |
Critical bibliographical | A6 B1 B2 B7 B9 B24 C1 C2 | Students do a literature search on a language topic. For this, groups of 5 students will be made. Assessment criteria: Bibliographic richness (national and international journals, recent and coming from prestigious databases such as Web of Science, Scopus, etc), capacity for synthesis and organization of information, correction and good use of APA standards for the citation of documentary sources used. |
10 |
Assessment comments | |||
The teacher will value the participation and positive disposition shown during the performance of clinical practices, to discuss cases and conferences, as well as to attend conferences or courses organized by the teacher. To pass this subject, it´s necessary to obtain or 50% of total, for this the students need a minimum score of 5. Students non assistants: Students from previous courses don´t do a bibliographic recession and final calcification performed according to do value reached in mixed probation (70%) and not case study (30%). |
|