Teaching GuideTerm
Faculty of Health Sciences
  Home | galego | castellano | english | A A |  
Mestrado Universitario en Xerontoloxía (Plan 2011)
 Subjects
  Master Final Project
   Assessment
Methodologies Competencies Description Qualification
Supervised projects A5 A6 A7 A8 A9 A10 A11 C1 C2 For the evaluation of the work, the report presented, the public presentation and the answers to the questions of the tribunal will be taken into account. The scientific rigor, the consistency of the process developed and its original contributions will be especially valued. The reading and defense will take place in a public session during the academic year and will be called by the president of the examining board and made public on the Center's bulletin boards. Once the defense of the thesis is finished, each member of the examining board will formulate a written evaluation of the thesis, according to the competences achieved and defined, both generic and transversal, in the degree.
In accordance with article 5 of RD 1125/2003, the examining board will award a quantitative and a qualitative grade that will include the grade of "fail" (from 0 to 4.9), "pass" (from 5 to 6.9), "notable" (from 7 to 8.9) or "outstanding" (from 9 to 10).
The examining board may award the grade of "matrícula de honor" if the overall grade is "sobresaliente" (outstanding) and if all its members vote in favor, taking into account the regulations of each University in this regard.
50
Document analysis A5 A6 A7 A8 A9 A10 A11 B5 B6 B7 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 For the evaluation of the work, the report presented in written format will be taken into account. The scientific rigor, the consistency of the process developed and its original contributions will be especially valued. 25
Oral presentation A11 C1 C2 The student must present the work and defend it before a panel to be appointed by the Master's Academic Committee. The panel will be formed by three professors/doctors from the teaching staff of the degree. 25
 
Assessment comments

TUTORED WORK: In case of detecting fraud, copying or plagiarism in the writing of the work of the subject, it will imply a failure in the affected evaluation opportunity (0.0) and direct referral to the next opportunity. This attitude will be communicated to the Academic Committee and to the rest of the professors of the degree. If the irregularity is repeated in a 2nd evaluation, the Committee may request the Rector the temporary or perpetual expulsion of the student from the Master's degree.

Universidade da Coruña - Rúa Maestranza 9, 15001 A Coruña - Tel. +34 981 16 70 00  Soporte Guías Docentes