Teaching GuideTerm Faculty of Philology |
Mestrado Universitario en Estudos Ingleses Avanzados e as súas Aplicacións (2019) |
Subjects |
Cognition and Cognitive Processes in English |
Assessment |
Identifying Data | 2021/22 | |||||||||||||
Subject | Cognition and Cognitive Processes in English | Code | 613505110 | |||||||||||
Study programme |
|
|||||||||||||
Descriptors | Cycle | Period | Year | Type | Credits | |||||||||
Official Master's Degree | 2nd four-month period |
First | Optional | 3 | ||||||||||
|
Methodologies | Competencies | Description | Qualification |
Seminar | A1 A2 A3 A4 B7 B8 B10 | Assistance is mandatory. Active participation in classes which are considered as interactive: up to 20% of the final grade. |
20 |
Long answer / essay questions | A1 A2 A3 A4 | Written or oral test in which the theoretical and practical contents of the course are included, with the presence of theoretical questions and exercises. Course work (s) done in class: 60% (exceptionally an out-of-class essay and an oral presentation could be added to the final assessment) Skills in the expression in English, both oral and written English, and correct structuring and presentation of activities, participation in debates and seminars: up to 20% |
80 |
Assessment comments | |||
Given that this degree programme is Students Any student who does not carry out the supervised work, if any, or the class work, or has not performed work equal to or greater than 50% of the rest of the evaluation categories, will obtain the rating of NO PRESENTADO. Anyone who does not show up for the written test can only achieve the grade of No presentado. Students Plagiarism In this subject, the Turnitin tool could be used in the evaluation of essays and activities. Based on the recommendations of the Xunta de Facultade, the following text is added for the students' consideration: Turnitin is an application for teachers to review parts of a text from other texts and indicate their origin. This tool can identify papers presented previously in this or other universities, including those written by the same student. If this circumstance occurs, it will be understood that it is contrary to academic honesty and will be applied to the academic regulations for evaluations, grades, etc. |
|