Supervised projects |
A4 B2 B7 C1 |
To assess the supervised work to be developed during the course, the development of the basic study on the proposed topics will be taken into account, taking into account the experiential approach - professional or practical - expressed, as well as the interpretation of the same by the student from the models theorists of the Anthropology of health or disability
|
40 |
Workbook |
B3 C4 |
The capacity of analysis, identification of problems and critical argumentation of answers to them will be valued in the personal presentation and comment, followed by debate, at the end of the sessions, on selected readings of Anthropology and ethnography of health and disability. |
30 |
- The blended students, or those who do not attend at least 2/3 of the sessions of the course, must compulsorily carry out the objective test, as well as the other methodologies contemplated, although only the first will be done in person. - Regular assistant students may voluntarily choose to take the objective test. If they choose not to do it, supervised work will mean 50% of the grade, readings 35% and bibliographic reviews 15% - The students who present themselves to the second opportunity call must do so in those methodologies not passed -or not presented and should be done- in the first call. In this case, only the objective test of the 2nd call will be face-to-face, while the other methodologies will be covered by sending the corresponding works in digital format, and via Moodle or email.
-The fraudulent performance of the tests or evaluation activities will directly imply the qualification of failure '0' in the matter in the corresponding call, thus invalidating any qualification obtained in all the evaluation activities for the extraordinary call
|