| Supervised projects |
A1 A2 A4 B1 B3 B4 B5 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C8 |
Its development is fully understood individually and of a non-presential nature. In order to guarantee the authorship of the work, and the adequate acquisition of competences, in its evaluation the successive control sessions are considered relevant through face-to-face tutorials with the assigned teacher and, therefore, the degree of compliance in relation to the indications formulated in each case by the teaching staff.
Other aspects to assess are: the quality of the final grammatical, graphic and documentary expression, the capacity for analysis and synthesis, the depth and rigor of the arguments and their development, critical reasoning, the search for written information sources and graphics, the ability to relate the different sections, the correction of the methodological study, the analysis carried out and the conclusions presented at the end of the work. |
100 |
</p><p><b>Second chance evaluation: </b>In order to qualify for the second chance evaluation, the general attendance conditions must be met during the course and the supervised project must have been delivered within the corresponding period. </p><p><b>Evaluation in advance call:</b> To be eligible for the evaluation in advance call, the general attendance conditions must be met in a previous course and the supervised project must have been delivered within the corresponding term. </p><p><b>Qualification of not presented:</b> If the supervised project is not delivered within the corresponding term, the qualification will be "Not presented". </p><p>
<b>Students with recognition of part-time dedication and academic waiver of attendance exemption:</b> In these cases, as long as they have official recognition from the management of the center, the minimum attendance requirement will not be taken into account, keeping the rest of the general requirements established . </p> |
Subjects