| Laboratory practice |
A2 A3 A4 A13 A18 C3 C8 |
Methodology that allows students to learn effectively through the realization of activities of a practical nature, such as demonstrations, exercises, experiments and research. The evaluation will take into account the active participation in the preparation of the works in addition to their presentation in the class. The qualification will be awarded between a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 3. |
10 |
| Mixed objective/subjective test |
A2 A3 A5 A6 A7 A9 A13 A14 A15 A16 A19 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 C8 C9 |
Test that integrates questions type of essay tests and type questions of objective tests. As for essay questions, it collects open-ended development questions. In addition, as objective questions, you can combine multiple-choice, sorting, short-answer, discrimination, completion, and/or association questions. The evaluation shall take into account adequately answering the questions raised in the test. The overcoming of the same will be achieved obtaining at least 6 bribe of 10 points on average in the test. Each question will be valued from 0 to 10 points.
|
65 |
| Guest lecture / keynote speech |
A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A7 A8 A9 A10 A11 A12 A17 A18 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 C1 C4 C5 C8 C9 |
Oral presentation complemented with the use of audiovisual media and the introduction of some questions aimed at students, in order to transmit knowledge and facilitate learning. The master class is also known as "lecture", "expository method" or "master class". This last modality is usually reserved for a special type of lesson taught by a teacher on special occasions, with a content that supposes an original elaboration and based on the almost exclusive use of the word as a means of transmitting information to the audience. The evaluation will take into account the presentation of a small summary of the treaty in the classroom at the end of the class. The rating will be 0 in case of not presenting it or doing it wrong and 1.
|
5 |
| Critical bibliographical |
A2 A17 |
The bibliographic review involves a process of critical reading of a book, an article, a tese or a communication to a congress. As such a process includes the reading of the work, the analysis of its content and a critique and evaluation of it in relation to the existing literature on the subject. A review does not suppose a summary of the work, nor a mere analysis of the content, because what gives it meaning and scientific academic dimension is the criticism it deserves in the opinion of the author of the review, in relation to other known works of the same field or in relation to his own experience. If you will evaluate your presentation in a timely manner in addition to giving one of the sections of it. The rating will be awarded between a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 3 |
15 |
The
relationship between theoretical and practical contents is established at 65%
for the theoretical and 35% for the practical. To be
eligible to take the final exam (Mixed Test), students must achieve a minimum
grade of 4 (0-10) in the average grade of all continuous evaluation activities. Students
who have the option of Honors, to opt for it, must present the memory of the
contents of the course (both theoretical and practical), prepared by
themselves, within the period established. If the evaluation of the same is
positive, they will reach the aforementioned qualification. In the event that
there are more candidates than Honours available, an order of priority will be
established. |
Subjects