Teaching GuideTerm
Faculty of Educational Studies
  Home | galego | castellano | english | A A A |  
Grao en Educación Social
 Subjects
  Organisation Organization and Management of Socio-Educational Institutions
   Assessment
Methodologies Competencies Description Qualification
Long answer / essay questions A1 A2 B1 B2 C1 C6 Review criteria of the exam:

1. Definition and / or identification of key ideas.
2. Ability to synthesize and concretize ideas.
3. Coherence and cohesion of ideas in argumentation.
4. Application of the concepts worked on the subject.
5. Elaboration, analysis, synthesis and critical evaluation of the information.
6. Analysis and relationship between concepts and connection with social reality. 		50
Document analysis A1 A2 A5 B1 B3 The following aspects will be assessed in the documentary analysis:

1. Rigor in the review and analysis of sources.
2. Reflection and deepening on the treated theme.
3. Connection of the mentioned arguments with the social reality.
4. Comprehension and approach to the basic contents. 		20
Directed discussion B2 B6 C1 C4 C6 The assessment criteria in this section will be included in a scale with the following items:

1. Expository clarity
2. Approach to the basic contents of the subject
3. Argumentation and support of their ideas
4. Active listening and respect in communicative exchange
5. Participatory attitude 		5
Oral presentation A15 B2 B6 C1 C8 The assessment criteria of this section will be syntethize the following items:

1. Exposure clarity and appropriate format
2. Approach to the basic contents of the subject
3. Conceptual domain and literature review
4. Level of cooperation and exposure of the work as a whole, not as a sum of parts. 		5
Case study A5 A6 A7 A15 A21 B5 The assessment of the case study report will be based on the following criteria:

1. Use of the academic record and expository clarity
2. Grammar and formatting correction
3. Approach to studied and argumented contents
4. Critical and reflective analysis with sufficient bibliographic review. 		20
 
Assessment comments

"English Friendly"Subject

The final assessment will have the following breakdown:

Final exam, value of 50% of the final grade (the minimum rating is 4 out of 10).

Maximum grade of the case study will be 20% of the grade, along with oral presentation (5%).

Maximum grade for the analysis of documentary sources will be 20% of the grade, along with the directed discussion (5%).

To pass in all cases the grade point average must be equal to or higher than 5 points.

If you have an academic exemption, according to UDC regulations, only the final exam will be taken into account for the assessment, which will therefore have a 100% weighted value in the qualification.

For students who have pending subjects from previous courses, they can choose to either redo the assignments or only take the essay test for evaluation, which will have a weighted value of 100% in the grade. The assignments evaluated in previous sessions will not be taken into account.

IMPORTANT-1: In case of committing plagiarism or fraudulently carrying out exams or other evaluation activities, the final grade will be a fail in the term when the offense is committed: the student will be given a "fail" grade (numeric grade 0) in the corresponding academic year term, whether the offense occurs in the first opportunity or the second. If necessary, their grade will be modified in the record of the first or second opportunity.

IMPORTANT-2: Group work ( is intended to raise the individual grade of the exam, not to lower it. In other words, if all works together receive a lower score than the exam, the final grade will be based on the individual exam score.  Thus, group work cannot harm individual work.

NON-ATTENDANCE AND EXEMPTION: Students with academic exemption or irregular attendance must contact the respective professor and, to pass the subject, will take the final exam, which will account for 100% of the final grade. In exceptional cases, the professor may allow the student to participate in other evaluation activities in some way. In such cases, the value of the final exam will be weighted based on the degree and quality of participation in other subject activities.

GENDER PERSPECTIVE EQUALITY: As stated in various regulations of university teaching, this subject will incorporate a gender perspective: non-sexist language will be used, bibliography authored by both genders will be used, equal participation of students in class sessions will be encouraged, identification and modification of sexist biases and attitudes will be addressed, and efforts will be made to change discriminatory processes in the environment and promote values of respect and equality. Possible situations of gender-based discrimination will be identified and proposals for actions and measures to correct them will be made.
Universidade da Coruña - Rúa Maestranza 9, 15001 A Coruña - Tel. +34 981 16 70 00  Soporte Guías Docentes