|
Teaching GuideTerm Faculty of Humanities |
Guía Provisional
|
| Grao en Relacións Internacionais |
 Subjects |
| Ethics of Globalization and Human Rights |
| Assessment |
|
|
| Identifying Data | 2024/25 | |||||||||||||
| Subject | Ethics of Globalization and Human Rights | Code | 710G05007 | |||||||||||
| Study programme |
|
|||||||||||||
| Descriptors | Cycle | Period | Year | Type | Credits | |||||||||
| Graduate | 2nd four-month period |
First | Basic training | 6 | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
| Methodologies | Competencies / Results | Description | Qualification |
| Workshop | A7 A10 A11 B7 B2 C4 | The workshop includes 2 presentations (one for each topic of the contents) delivered by a group of students that presents a particular subject according to a proposed document and some instructions, followed by a discussion ("case study"). Students will receive 2 points for the 2 presentations. Workshop presentations will be qualitatively assessed. Criteria for evaluation will be specified in the classes. |
20 |
| Case study | A7 A10 A11 B2 C4 | After every workshop presentation (up to 15 throughout the course), all students must participate in the discussion of the proposed topic and document on an individual basis. Students will receive up to 4 points for this participation, according to the total workshop/case study days available in each course. Participation will be qualitatively assessed. Criteria for evaluation will be specified in the classes |
40 |
| Objective test | A3 A7 A11 | Assessment of the knowledge and understanding of the contents of the keynote speeches. The test will consist of a set of questions for each of the two first topics of the content of the course. Each question roughly refers to one sub-section of the different sub-topics that compose each topic. Students must answer two questions for each topic. In some cases, students may be able to choose amongst different proposed questions. | 40 |
| Assessment comments | |||
|
How to pass the course In order to pass the course, students must achieve 5 points. No minimum is required neither for the workshops nor for the objective test. Plagiarism or academic fraud Student fraudulent behavior in the assessment activities, and particularly plagiarism, will result in a grade of 0 (fail) in the correspondent opportunity. Assessment criteria for the 2nd opportunity In the second opportunity, the objective test (50%) will have the same structure than in the first opportunity. The workshop (50%) will be assessed through the delivery of two papers, one for each topic of the course, and a brief oral discussion with the lecturers of all the workshops proposed for the course, scheduled before the date of the objective test. Part-time dedication and exemption from class attendance All issues related to "academic dispensation", "dedication to study", "permanence" and "academic fraud shall be governed in accordance with UDC's academic normative in force. Equivalence at the University of Vigo Being a SUG's inter-university degree offered jointly with the University of Vigo, the different denominations of the methodologies and assessment activities adopted by the latter are here described: Directed/supervised work (essay): 20% Periodic test(s): 40% Directed/supervised work (case study): 40% |
|||
|
