Regardingthe general evaluation of the course, the following aspects will be assessed:attendance and participation in class and workshops, evaluation of group work,evaluation of individual work, final test (mixed and practical).

Topass the course it is necessary to pass each of these items:

-Class attendance: minimum 80% of lecture sessions and 80% of interactivesessions. In addition, the teaching staff will assess whether the assistance isactive through participation in the lecture sessions (answering questionsposed), in team corrections, or individually. Active participation may bevalued as an increase in the final grade.

-Workshop (U5): minimum 5

-Collaborative learning (Workshop): minimum 5

-Mixed test: minimum 5

-Practical exam: minimum 5

Inthe case of Fail in one of the items at the first opportunity, this item mustbe repeated and submitted at the second opportunity. Therefore, a list with theparts to be repeated will be provided. The grade of the first opportunity willbe "Fail" if any of the items has been submitted, but not passed or"Not Submitted" (No Presentado) if any of the assessable items hasbeen submitted.

Forstudents with recognition of part-time dedication according to the "Normthat regulates the regime of dedication to study of undergraduate students atthe UDC" the minimum class attendance will be 60%, both in the interactivesessions and in the expository sessions. The rest of the evaluation items will be thesame as in the general case. In relation to the final test, the provisions inarticle 12 of the "Norms for Evaluation, Review and Claim ofQualifications for University Master's and Bachelor's Studies at the UDC"(consolidated version 2017) will apply.

Academic waiver: it is not contemplated, as it is a subject in which the workshop is the fundamental methodology.

The detection of plagiarism, as well as the fraudulent performance of tests or evaluation activities, once verified, will directly imply the grade of failing "0" in the subject in the corresponding call, thus invalidating any grade obtained in all evaluation activities. ahead of the extraordinary call.

Second opportunity:

To pass the course at the second opportunity, it is necessary to repeat the assessable items in which a Pass has not been achieved.

The course work (Planning and Collaborative Learning Workshop-Urbanization) will be re-elaborated, amended or completed according to the indications of the tutors of the course. For this, it is recommended that students make use of academic tutorials with their corresponding tutors during the second semester. The coursework will be submitted, at most, up to one week before the second opportunity exam.

Students who have pending work not delivered will not be able to take the exam.

To pass the subject on the second chance, it is necessary to achieve a 5 each of the assessable elements:

- Workshop (U5): minimum 5

-Collaborative learning (Workshop): minimum 5

-Mixed test: minimum 5

-Practical exam: minimum 5

Students who have not met the minimum class attendance during the term will not be eligible for a positive evaluation.

If one or more of these elements does not achieve the Pass evaluation threshold, the final mark will be Fail. However, active participation in class, during the term, demonstrating an adequate knowledge of the contents of the subject may be valued by the teaching staff in borderline situations regarding the practical test or the mixed test.

Learning outcomes	Study programme competences
Acquire knowledge to project, plan, coordinate and direct the design and execution of urban infrastructures, incorporating criteria of sustainability, minimum environmental impact, economy and resilience.	A34 A35 A36 A37 A39 A41 A42 A44 A45 A46 A47 A52 A53 A55 A58 A59 A60 A61 A62 A63	B4 B5 B8 B11 B12	C1 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8
Acquire knowledge to project, plan, coordinate and direct the design and execution of public or private outdoor spaces, with sustainability, comfort and landscape integration criteria.	A55 A58 A59 A60 A61 A62 A63	B11 B12	C6 C8
Learn to organize the process of construction, transformation, conservation and regeneration of human settlements; giving priority to the landscape, the treatment of form and space based on a design, perfecting the student's ability to intervene professionally in the different urban and / or rural areas, in relation to normative, constructive, environmental, social and of temporal and economic planning that an intervention of this type entails.	A34 A35 A36 A37 A39 A41 A42 A44 A45 A46 A47 A52 A53	B4 B5 B8	C1 C3 C4 C5 C7
Learn to prepare adequate cartographic documentation for the analysis and effective transmission of information and urban planning.	A1 A2 A3 A6 A10 A59	B4 B8	C3 C6 C8

Topic	Sub-topic
Urban Planning Representation Techniques	- Geographic information systems - Conventions, notations and technical standards of planning
The urban planning system	- General Framework: types of plans, objectives, processes, phases, scope and application - Land classification: Land classes, delimitation criteria, classification effects, sectoral regulations and their limitations - Development planning: types and scope of development plans, relationship with the general plan, urban standards, management criteria. - Special plans: objectives and scope of special plans, types of special plans, design criteria, examples. - Ordinances and typologies: ordinance as a mediator between the architectural project and urban planning; the definition of the ordinance, its interpretation and application; the details of the ordinance that define urban quality; urban typologies and urban parameters - Economy and planning: concept of costs and benefits; consideration of cost and benefit in the definition of planning; economic studies as part of the plan. - Sustainability and planning: the impact of urban activities, assessment tools, mitigation strategies, climate emergency and resilience, global context (SDG, Urban Agenda, European Green Deal, etc ...)
Urbanization projects	- General framework: scope, objectives, contents, relationship with the other phases of the planning process - Public space design: scope, criteria, accessibility, inclusion, participation. - Streets design and layou: the street as an articulating element of social relations; multimodal urban mobility (motorized and non-motorized vehicles, public transport, pedestrian ...) and their associated spaces; design strategies for a human-scale city. - Urban Infrastructures: service networks (lighting, sanitation, stormwater management, supply, energy), design and layout criteria, integration and coordination, sustainability.

Methodologies / tests	Competencies	Ordinary class hours	Student’s personal work hours	Total hours
Workshop	A34 A35 A36 A37 A39 A41 A42 A44 A45 A46 A47 A52 A53 A55 A58 A60 A61 A62 A63 B4 B5 B8 B11 C1 C3 C4	24	48	72
Collaborative learning	A1 A2 A3 A6 A10 A34 A35 A36 A37 A39 A41 A42 A44 A45 A46 A47 A52 A53 A55 A58 A59 A60 B5 B8 B11 B12 C1 C3 C4 C5 C7 C8	10	10	20
Guest lecture / keynote speech	A52 A53 A55 A58 A59 A61 B8 B11	10	10	20
Document analysis	C3 C4 C5 C8	1	1	2
Mixed objective/subjective test	A35 A52 A53 A55 A58 A59 A60 B8 C1	1	2	3
Seminar	A1 A2 A3 A6 A10 C6	10	10	20
Events academic / information	A1 A55 C4	2	4	6
Practical test:	A34 A35 A36 A37 A39 A41 A42 A45 A46 A47 A52 A53 A59	2	4	6

Personalized attention		1	0	1

(*)The information in the planning table is for guidance only and does not take into account the heterogeneity of the students.

Methodologies	Description
Workshop	Organization of the class in small groups in which the students work together in the resolution of an urban planning in an area proposed by the tutors. The coursework will be developed in face-to-face sessiones and each week the progress will be reviewed according to the marked schedule.
Collaborative learning	Exercises guided in person and / or supported with information and communication technologies, which are based on the organization of the class in small groups in which students work together to solve tasks assigned by teachers to optimize their own learning and that of other members of the group. Part of this work will be done in support of the program coordinated by Projects 8.
Guest lecture / keynote speech	Each week, a topic will be introduced by the lecturers. The student will have to supplement this presentation with the reading of recommended bibliography extracts. Attendance to lectures is mandatory, with a maximum of 20% of unexcused absences admitted. Sessions will be strictly timely. The use of mobile devices (such as computers, tablets or phones) will not be allowed during the course of the class
Document analysis	An important part of coursework consists in selecting the relevant information and data. Therefore, the student should be familiar with the instruments of the discipline. In addition, the existing cartographic bases in the different institutional repositories will be used.
Mixed objective/subjective test	Assessment exam for the level of knowledge of the contents of the subject. The test may include short answer questions, multiple choice questions, diagrams, drawings or sketches.
Seminar	Group work sessions focused on the introduction to Geographic Information Systems
Events academic / information	Preparation of material synthesis of the coursework for end of year exhibition organized by the Department of Architectural Projects, Urbanism and Composition: "Architectures in Process. DPAUC" (panels, models, drawings, videos, texts, representations, etc). Attendance at dissemination events (congresses, conferences, symposiums, seminars, etc.), organized by the ETSAC, the DPAUC, etc., indicated by the teaching staff of the subject as part of the teaching content of the subject, with the aim of providing students current knowledge and experience related to a particular field of study
Practical test:	Individual test that will consist of the resolution, at sketch-preliminary design level, of an intervention program on a given site.

Methodologies	Competencies	Description	Qualification
Practical test:	A34 A35 A36 A37 A39 A41 A42 A45 A46 A47 A52 A53 A59	The capacity for effective interpretation and resolution of the proposed problem will be assessed, taking into account local, programmatic, environmental, topographic or regulatory restrictions.	10
Workshop	A34 A35 A36 A37 A39 A41 A42 A44 A45 A46 A47 A52 A53 A55 A58 A60 A61 A62 A63 B4 B5 B8 B11 C1 C3 C4	Active participation in the classroom, attendance, adequate progress in work and the fulfillment of the specific objectives proposed in the workshop statement will be evaluated. The works will include a part of the group and an individual development. Each of these parts will be assessed independently and both parties will have to approve.	40
Collaborative learning	A1 A2 A3 A6 A10 A34 A35 A36 A37 A39 A41 A42 A44 A45 A46 A47 A52 A53 A55 A58 A59 A60 B5 B8 B11 B12 C1 C3 C4 C5 C7 C8	Participation will be evaluated actively, critical attitude, architectural and urban culture and the ability to articulate and expose public-motivated opinions.	30
Mixed objective/subjective test	A35 A52 A53 A55 A58 A59 A60 B8 C1	The acquisition of the theoretical knowledge introduced in the course will be evaluated	10
Events academic / information	A1 A55 C4	Preparation of material summarize the coursework for the end of year exhibition organized by the Department of Architectural Projects, Urban Planning and Composition: "Architectures in Course. DPAUC" (panels, models, drawings, videos, texts, performances , etc.).	10

Assessment comments
Regardingthe general evaluation of the course, the following aspects will be assessed:attendance and participation in class and workshops, evaluation of group work,evaluation of individual work, final test (mixed and practical). Topass the course it is necessary to pass each of these items: -Class attendance: minimum 80% of lecture sessions and 80% of interactivesessions. In addition, the teaching staff will assess whether the assistance isactive through participation in the lecture sessions (answering questionsposed), in team corrections, or individually. Active participation may bevalued as an increase in the final grade. -Workshop (U5): minimum 5 -Collaborative learning (Workshop): minimum 5 -Mixed test: minimum 5 -Practical exam: minimum 5 Inthe case of Fail in one of the items at the first opportunity, this item mustbe repeated and submitted at the second opportunity. Therefore, a list with theparts to be repeated will be provided. The grade of the first opportunity willbe "Fail" if any of the items has been submitted, but not passed or"Not Submitted" (No Presentado) if any of the assessable items hasbeen submitted. Forstudents with recognition of part-time dedication according to the "Normthat regulates the regime of dedication to study of undergraduate students atthe UDC" the minimum class attendance will be 60%, both in the interactivesessions and in the expository sessions. The rest of the evaluation items will be thesame as in the general case. In relation to the final test, the provisions inarticle 12 of the "Norms for Evaluation, Review and Claim ofQualifications for University Master's and Bachelor's Studies at the UDC"(consolidated version 2017) will apply. Academic waiver: it is not contemplated, as it is a subject in which the workshop is the fundamental methodology. The detection of plagiarism, as well as the fraudulent performance of tests or evaluation activities, once verified, will directly imply the grade of failing "0" in the subject in the corresponding call, thus invalidating any grade obtained in all evaluation activities. ahead of the extraordinary call. Second opportunity: To pass the course at the second opportunity, it is necessary to repeat the assessable items in which a Pass has not been achieved. The course work (Planning and Collaborative Learning Workshop-Urbanization) will be re-elaborated, amended or completed according to the indications of the tutors of the course. For this, it is recommended that students make use of academic tutorials with their corresponding tutors during the second semester. The coursework will be submitted, at most, up to one week before the second opportunity exam. Students who have pending work not delivered will not be able to take the exam. To pass the subject on the second chance, it is necessary to achieve a 5 each of the assessable elements: - Workshop (U5): minimum 5 -Collaborative learning (Workshop): minimum 5 -Mixed test: minimum 5 -Practical exam: minimum 5 Students who have not met the minimum class attendance during the term will not be eligible for a positive evaluation. If one or more of these elements does not achieve the Pass evaluation threshold, the final mark will be Fail. However, active participation in class, during the term, demonstrating an adequate knowledge of the contents of the subject may be valued by the teaching staff in borderline situations regarding the practical test or the mixed test.

Basic
	Ashihara, Y. (1982). El diseño de espacios exteriores. Barcelona:Gustavo Gili Bentley, Alcock,Murrain McGlynn, Smith (1999). Entornos vitales. Hacia un entorno urbano y arquitectónico más humano. Manual Práctico. Barcelona:Gustavo Gili Busquets, J &amp; Correa, F. (2006). Ciudades X Formas. Una nueva mirada hacia el proyecto urbanístico. Harvard University Corominas, M. Sabaté, J. Sotoca, A. (2007). Planes muy especiales. COAC Escola Sert DALDA ESCUDERO, Juan Luís. DRU-2. Teoría y método del planeamiento general y urbano. A Coruña: Departamento de Proxectos Arquitectónicos e Urbanismo, Universidade da Coruña, 2009 Fariña Tojo, J. (2015) Clima Territorio y Urbanismo. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. Fernández Prado, M. Rodríguez Álvarez, J. ed. (2013)DRU 7: Miscelánea Urbanística:Experiencias, retos e instrumentos. Departamento de Proyectos Arquitectónicos y Urbanismo. Universidade da Coruña Forman, R. T.T. (2007) Urban Regions. Ecology and Planning Beyond the City. Cambridge University Press. Gehl, J. & Svarre B. (2013) How to study public life. Island Press Gehl, J. (2006). La humanización del espacio urbano. La vida social entre los edificios. Barcelona:Editorial Reverté Gehl, J. (2010) Ciudades para la gente. Ediciones Infinito GONZÁLEZ-CEBRIÁN TELLO, José Juan. DRU-3. Intervención sobre el Medio Rural en Galicia. Una aproximación a su realidad territorial. A Coruña: Departamento de Proxectos Arquitectónicos e Urbanismo, Universidade da Coruña, 2009. GONZÁLEZ-CEBRIÁN TELLO, José Juan; GONZÁLEZ HARGUINDEY, Javier; PEÑA PEREDA, Felipe (coords.). DRU-6. Juan Luís Dalda Escudero. Urbanista. A Coruña: Departamento de Proxectos Arquitectónicos e Urbanismo, Universidade da Coruña, 2011 Herce, M. (2009). Sobre la movilidad en la ciudad. Barcelona:Editorial Reverté McCluskey, J. (1985). El diseño de vías urbanas. Barcelona:Gustavo Gili McCluskey, J. (1987). Parking. Manual de diseño ambiental. Barcelona:Gustavo Gili McHarg, I. (1972) Design with Nature New York Doubleday & Company 1972 Salvador Palomo, P. J. (2003). La planificación verde en las ciudades. Gustavo Gili. Sennett, R. (2018) Living and Dwelling. Ethics for the City. Penguin Books Sennett, R. (2020) Construir y Habitar. Ética para la ciudad. Anagrama Sim, D. (2019) Soft City: Building Density for Everyday Life. Island Press Solá-Morales,M. (1987). El proyecto urbano I. UR N5 Solá-Morales,M. (1988). El proyecto urbano II. UR N6
Complementary

Other comments