Study programme competencies |
Code
|
Study programme competences / results
|
A2 |
Conocimiento de la dimensión ética y política de la sociedad digital |
A3 |
Conocimiento y comprensión de los cambios en los conceptos, los sujetos y los procesos jurídicos en la sociedad digital |
A14 |
Conocimientos y habilidades para comprender y resolver las cuestiones jurídicas relacionadas con la criminalidad informática, la ciberseguridad y la ciberdefensa |
B4 |
Capacidad para identificar cuestiones jurídicas relevantes partiendo de un conjunto complejo de hechos no estructurado jurídicamente. |
B7 |
Capacidad para diseñar estrategias y soluciones nuevas e imaginativas para los problemas |
B20 |
Poseer y comprender conocimientos que aporten una base u oportunidad de ser originales en el desarrollo y/o aplicación de ideas, a menudo en un contexto de investigación |
B21 |
Que los estudiantes sepan aplicar los conocimientos adquiridos y su capacidad de resolución de problemas en entornos nuevos o poco conocidos dentro de contextos más amplios (o multidisciplinares) relacionados con su área de estudio CB8 - Que los estudiantes sean capaces de integrar conocimientos y enfrentarse a la complejidad de formular juicios a partir de una información que, siendo incompleta o limitada, incluya reflexiones sobre las responsabilidades sociales y éticas vinculadas a la aplicación de sus conocimientos y juicios |
B22 |
Que los estudiantes sepan comunicar sus conclusiones y los conocimientos y razones últimas que las sustentan a públicos especializados y no especializados de un modo claro y sin ambigüedades |
C4 |
Desarrollarse para el ejercicio de una ciudadanía respetuosa con la cultura democrática, los derechos humanos y la perspectiva de género |
C6 |
Valorar críticamente el conocimiento, la tecnología y la información disponible para resolver los problemas a los que deban enfrentarse. |
C7 |
Asumir como profesional y ciudadano la importancia del aprendizaje a lo largo de su vida. |
Learning aims |
Learning outcomes |
Study programme competences / results |
Knowing how to place digital and artificial intelligence law in the social and political context |
AJ2 AJ3
|
BJ4 BJ21
|
CJ4 CJ6
|
Knowing how to anticipate and adapt to technological changes |
AJ3
|
BJ7 BJ20
|
CJ6
|
Knowing how to place technological development within the framework of global human life |
AJ2 AJ3
|
|
CJ4 CJ6
|
Building a humanistic basis to face technological challenges |
AJ2 AJ3
|
BJ4
|
CJ4 CJ6
|
Knowing the changes and challenges for legal relationships due to the influence of technology |
AJ3 AJ14
|
BJ7
|
CJ4 CJ6 CJ7
|
Knowing the influence of digital technology in the configuration and guarantee of fundamental rights |
AJ2 AJ14
|
BJ21
|
CJ4 CJ6
|
Knowing the basic aspects of decision-making supported by artificial intelligence |
AJ2 AJ3
|
BJ4 BJ7 BJ20 BJ21 BJ22
|
CJ6 CJ7
|
Acquiring conceptual tools to think about current times |
AJ3
|
BJ20
|
CJ6 CJ7
|
Grasping a global vision of the Law in order to face the challenges and gaps in the technological context |
AJ3
|
BJ4 BJ21 BJ22
|
CJ4 CJ6
|
Contents |
Topic |
Sub-topic |
Technical introduction to new technologies |
Basic knowledge in artificial intelligence |
Digital society and the cyberspace |
Science, technology and law
Transformations in international society: a digital world order International and European framework of cyberspace |
State, territory, and digital soberanity |
Territorial sovereignty in the digital age
State and international actors in the digital scenario
Digital democracy: sovereignty and governance |
Ethical framework of the digital society |
Does the digital society need an Ethics?
Ethics of artificial intelligence and fundamental rights |
Technology and fundamental rights |
Fundamental rights and digital rights
Freedoms and informative determinism
Equality and non-discrimination. Superintelligence
Justice and algorithm |
Robotics, legal personhood, and liability |
Rights in the digital age
Digital identity
Digital inheritance
Robots liability |
Legal reasoning and artificial inteliigence |
Rationality and biases
Legal argumentation and artificial intelligence
Algorithms and discretionality |
Planning |
Methodologies / tests |
Competencies / Results |
Teaching hours (in-person & virtual) |
Student’s personal work hours |
Total hours |
Case study |
A2 A3 A14 B4 B7 B20 B21 B22 C4 C6 |
16 |
48 |
64 |
Objective test |
A2 A3 A14 B22 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
Events academic / information |
A2 A3 B20 C4 C6 C7 |
5 |
5 |
10 |
Guest lecture / keynote speech |
A2 A3 A14 B20 B21 C4 C6 C7 |
24 |
48 |
72 |
|
Personalized attention |
|
2 |
0 |
2 |
|
(*)The information in the planning table is for guidance only and does not take into account the heterogeneity of the students. |
Methodologies |
Methodologies |
Description |
Case study |
Critical exposition and analysis of texts or cases that serve to link theoretical learning with its practical application and to develop the capacity for synthesis, systematic, critical and creative thinking and argumentative skills. |
Objective test |
Assessment of the knowledge of the main contents of the subject |
Events academic / information |
Acquisition and updating of knowledge and dialogue with leading experts in the field.
Incorporation of different perspectives that improves learning. |
Guest lecture / keynote speech |
Introduction of the main contents of the subject. |
Personalized attention |
|
Description |
Supervision and reinforcement of the learning process.
Orientation for applying konwledges and developping argumentative skills.
Students with part-time dedication and exemption from class attendance. Supervision through tutorials. |
|
Assessment |
Methodologies
|
Competencies / Results |
Description
|
Qualification
|
Case study |
A2 A3 A14 B4 B7 B20 B21 B22 C4 C6 |
Evaluation of the practical application capacity of knowledge.
Evaluation of the ability for synthesis, critical analysis and creativity.
Assessment of argumentative fluency and coherence.
Assessment of accuracy in argumentation |
60 |
Objective test |
A2 A3 A14 B22 |
Assessment of knowledge and understanding of main contents. |
40 |
|
Assessment comments |
1. Assessment of the second opportunity. The student will keep the grade obtained in the case study if it is equal or higher than a passing grade in that part (3 or more). In case of a failing grade (less than 3) in that part, he/she will be able to use the modality for students with acknowledged part-time dedication and exemption from class attendance. 2. Plagiarism or academic fraud. Student fraudulentbehavior in the assessment activities, and particularly plagiarism (in theworkshops and document analysis), will result in a grade of "0 (Failing grade)" in the corresponding opportunity.
3. Assessmentcriteria for students with acknowledged part-time dedication and exemption fromclass attendance. The objective test (40%) will have the same conditions as for the rest of the students. The assessment of case study will consist of the delivery of written comments before the date of the exam (multiple-choice questions).
|
Sources of information |
Basic
|
Segura Serrano, A. (2017). Ciberseguridad y Derecho internacional. Revista española de Derecho internacional 69/2
Lessig, L. (2009). El código 2.0. Madrid: Traficantes de sueños
Barbé, E.; Costa, O.; Kissack, R. (eds.) (2016). EU policy responses to a shifting multilateral system. Palgrave Macmillan
Domínguez León, J. (2016). La ciberguerra como realidad posible contemplada desde la prospectiva. Revista de pensamiento estratégico y seguridad CISDE
García Herrera, V (2017). La disposición sucesoria del patrimonio digital. Actualidad civil 7-8
Solar Cayón, José Ignacio (2019). La inteligencia artificial jurídica. Thomson Reuters
Ebers, M. (2016). La utilización de agentes electrónicos inteligentes en el tráfico jurídico: ¿Necesitamos reglas especiales en el Derecho de la responsabilidad civil?. Indret 3
Solé Resina, J (2018). Las voluntades digitales: marco normativo actual. Anuario de Derecho civil LXXI
Gómez Ligüerre, C.; García Micó, G. (2020). Liability for Artificial Intelligence and other emerging technologies. Indret 1
AA.VV. (2020). Protección de datos personales. Valencia: Tirant
Cerrillo Martínez, A: Peguera Poch, M (coord.) (2020). Retos jurídicos de la inteligencia artificial. Aranzadi
Díaz Alabart, S. (2018). Robots y responsabilidad civil. Madrid: Reus
Bostrom, Nick (2016). Superinteligencia. Teell |
|
Complementary
|
|
|
Recommendations |
Subjects that it is recommended to have taken before |
|
Subjects that are recommended to be taken simultaneously |
|
Subjects that continue the syllabus |
|
|