A) EVALUATION REGULATIONS:

Assessment conditions: It is forbidden to access the exam room
with any device that allows communication with the outside and / or storage of
information. Cheating on the assessment tests or activities, once confirmed,
will result in a falling grade (a 0, as numeric mark) in the corresponding
convocatory and both in the first and in the second oportunities. If needed,
the mark in the first oportunity act will be altered.

Student identification: The student must prove her personality in
accordance with current regulations.

B) TYPES OF RATING:

Qualification of not presented: Corresponds to the student, when
he only participates in evaluation activities that have a weighting of less
than 20% on the final qualification, regardless of the qualification achieved.

Students with recognition of part-time dedication and academic
waiver of attendance exemption: Except for the dates approved in the Faculty
Board for the final objective test, for the remaining tests a specific calendar
of dates compatible with their dedication. For this reason, the student must
contact the teacher of the subject in the first ten days of the semester in
which the subject is taught, in order to set the aforementioned calendar. The
tests will have the same format as for full-time students.

C) ASSESSMENT OPPORTUNITIES:

1. First opportunity: The evaluation criteria previously indicated
in this section will be applied.

2. Second opportunity: The evaluation criteria are the same as in
the first opportunity.

3. Early opportunity: It will be evaluated through a mixed test
that will account for 100% of the final grade.

D) OTHER EVALUATION OBSERVATIONS:

1. In general, without prejudice to what is indicated for students
with recognition of part-time dedication and academic exemption from attendance
exemption, class attendance is required to qualify for the part of the grade
corresponding to continuous evaluation, both first chance and second chance. At
the end of the evaluation period corresponding to the first opportunity,
students who have yet to pass the subject may be proposed activities that allow
them to recover the part of the grade corresponding to the continuous
evaluation for the second opportunity, which they must request. to the teaching
staff of the subject at least ten days before the date of the second chance
exam.

2. The scoring criteria for each of the tests will be announced at
the time of the test and will be supplied with the statement of the test

Learning outcomes	Study programme competences
Know the role played by the Information Systems in the business organizations. Know also about the components of a Business System Information. Know the lifecycle of a Business Information System and, more precisely, the role played by its users in the different steps of that lifecycle.	A3 A9 A10 A18 A24	B1 B2 B3 B4	C1 C4 C5 C7
Practical issues related with the IT applied to the Business Management.	A5 A10 A14 A20	B3 B4 B6	C1 C3 C4 C7 C8
Know and learn the use of common BIE IT Tools, specifically studying those known as "office automation systems".	A5 A9 A10 A20	B7 B8 B9 B10	C1 C3 C6 C7 C8
Know, from a user point of view, the basic tools to design the data model and the procedures subsystem of a Business Information System.	A5 A10 A20 A24	B4 B5 B11 B12	C2 C3 C4
Show a general view of the Business Information Systems legal framework.	A7 A18	B2 B4 B6 B13 B14	C1 C4 C6

Topic	Sub-topic
1. Introduction to the Business Information System.	1.1 The information as a resource in the business activity. 1.2. The Business Information System. Concept, activities and components. 1.3. The Business Information System and the Business Decision Making Levels. 1.4. The Business Information System and the Business Environment. 1.5. The Lifecycle of a Business Information System.
2. Analysis and design of an Information System	2.1. Introduction to the data model. 2.2. The Entity-Relationship model.
3. Business Information Systems and IT.	3.1. Basic tools. 3.2. OAS tools. 3.3. Other tools.
4. General view of other relevant issues in a Business Information System.	4.1. General view of the security. 4.2. General view of the legal framework.

Methodologies / tests	Competencies	Ordinary class hours	Student’s personal work hours	Total hours
Guest lecture / keynote speech	A1 A3 A5 A7 A10 A16 A18 A20 A23 B5 B6 C3 C4 C5 C7 C8	17	51	68
Problem solving	A4 A9 A14 A24 B4 B3 B2 B14 B13 B12 B11 B10 B9 B8 B7 C3	23	50	73
Mixed objective/subjective test	A1 A4 B1 C1 C2 C6	1	2.5	3.5
Mixed objective/subjective test	A1 A4 B1 C1 C2 C6	1	2.5	3.5

Personalized attention		2	0	2

(*)The information in the planning table is for guidance only and does not take into account the heterogeneity of the students.

Methodologies	Description
Guest lecture / keynote speech	1. Classroom lectures about the theoretical and practical contents of the subject to guide the student in its preparation. 2. The time spent in each one of the subject chapters will be proportional to the difficulty level and to the length of those chapters. Thus, some chapters will take more time than others. The teacher is responsible of deciding how many time spend in each one of the subject chapters. 3. For preparing those chapters with thw lowest level of difficulty, the student should study the bibliography, although in the lectures the student will be orientated about: a) which are the bibliographic sources to study b) which are the most relevant and interesting issues to reach the learning goals set for the subject. 4. Discussion, together with all the workgroups, of the homework of each one of the workgroups. The student can participate: a) by his or her own, after being given the floor; b) after being required by the teacher to participate.
Problem solving	1. Development, exposition and resolution of practical exercises to be made by the student, being part of a workgroup, throghout the course. 2. Exercises and readings to be made by the student by his or herself. In subsequent classes: a) a review of the exercises will be made. In this review, the student can participate as stated in the point 3. b) a question time about the readings will be opened. 3. The student can participate: a) on his or her own, after being given the floor; b) after being required by the teacher to participate.
Mixed objective/subjective test	During the class period, one or more mixed tests will be held, which will not be of a non-compulsory nature.
Mixed objective/subjective test	Theoretical and practical examination of all the contents of the subject, which will be carried out in the first and second call.

Methodologies	Competencies	Description	Qualification
Problem solving	A4 A9 A14 A24 B4 B3 B2 B14 B13 B12 B11 B10 B9 B8 B7 C3	1. Preparation of one or more case studies proposed by the lecturers of the subject, as part of the continuous assessment, in which aspects related to the content of the subject will be developed, with the discussion of their development with the lecturers being an essential part of the assessment. The resolution of these cases may require the use of information and communication technologies (ICT), and if deliverables are required, they will be in electronic format. 2. The cases will be developed in groups of 4 to 6 students. Exceptionally, and with the prior approval of the teaching staff of the subject, a different number of students per group may be allowed. 3. Any doubt about this evaluation section must be solved by basing the solution on the idea of "continuous evaluation".	40
Mixed objective/subjective test	A1 A4 B1 C1 C2 C6	During the class period, one or more mixed tests of continuous assessment will be carried out, which will not have a releasing character. The test not taken will be marked as zero.	20
Mixed objective/subjective test	A1 A4 B1 C1 C2 C6	Theoretical-practical examination of all the contents of the course, to be held at the first and second call.	40

Assessment comments
A) EVALUATION REGULATIONS: Assessment conditions: It is forbidden to access the exam room with any device that allows communication with the outside and / or storage of information. Cheating on the assessment tests or activities, once confirmed, will result in a falling grade (a 0, as numeric mark) in the corresponding convocatory and both in the first and in the second oportunities. If needed, the mark in the first oportunity act will be altered. Student identification: The student must prove her personality in accordance with current regulations. B) TYPES OF RATING: Qualification of not presented: Corresponds to the student, when he only participates in evaluation activities that have a weighting of less than 20% on the final qualification, regardless of the qualification achieved. Students with recognition of part-time dedication and academic waiver of attendance exemption: Except for the dates approved in the Faculty Board for the final objective test, for the remaining tests a specific calendar of dates compatible with their dedication. For this reason, the student must contact the teacher of the subject in the first ten days of the semester in which the subject is taught, in order to set the aforementioned calendar. The tests will have the same format as for full-time students. C) ASSESSMENT OPPORTUNITIES: 1. First opportunity: The evaluation criteria previously indicated in this section will be applied. 2. Second opportunity: The evaluation criteria are the same as in the first opportunity. 3. Early opportunity: It will be evaluated through a mixed test that will account for 100% of the final grade. D) OTHER EVALUATION OBSERVATIONS: 1. In general, without prejudice to what is indicated for students with recognition of part-time dedication and academic exemption from attendance exemption, class attendance is required to qualify for the part of the grade corresponding to continuous evaluation, both first chance and second chance. At the end of the evaluation period corresponding to the first opportunity, students who have yet to pass the subject may be proposed activities that allow them to recover the part of the grade corresponding to the continuous evaluation for the second opportunity, which they must request. to the teaching staff of the subject at least ten days before the date of the second chance exam. 2. The scoring criteria for each of the tests will be announced at the time of the test and will be supplied with the statement of the test

Basic	Casas Roma, Jordi; Conesa Caralt, Jordi (2013). Diseño conceptual de bases de datos en UML. . Barcelona: UOC Tormo, Marisa (2018). Excel práctico: descubre su magia trabajando con fórmulas y funciones. . San Fernando de Henares, Madrid: RC Libros Piattini, M. G.; Calvo-Manzano, J. A.; Cervera, J. y Fernández, L. (2007). Análisis y diseño detallado de Aplicaciones Informáticas de Gestión. Ra_ma. Madrid Schmuller, J. (2000). Aprendiendo UML en 24 horas. Prentice Hall. México Pablos Heredero, C. de et al (2006). Dirección y gestión de los sistemas de información en la empresa (una visión integradora). Madrid: ESIC Teaching Soft Group (2011). Excel 2010 : curso práctico. Madrid: RA-MA Moreno Bonilla, Fernando (2010). Excel 2010 : modelos económicos y financieros. Madrid : Anaya Multimedia Travería, Santiago (2011). Excel 2010 a fondo. Barcelona : Inforbook's Silberschatz, Abraham; Korth, Henry F.; Sudarshan, S. (2014). Fundamentos de Bases de Datos. Aravaca : McGraw-Hill Edwards, Chris; Nytheway, Andy; Ward, John (1998). Fundamentos de sistemas de información. Madrid: Prentice Hall Arjonilla Domínguez, S. J. y Medina Garrido. J. A (2009). La gestión de los sistemas de información en la empresa. Pirámide. Madrid Giner de la Fuente, Fernando; Gil Estallo, María de los Angeles (2004). Los sistemas de información en la sociedad del conocimiento. Madrid: ESIC Kimmel, Paul (2007). Manual de UML. Guía de aprendizaje. McGraw Hill. México Valdés-Miranda Cros, Claudia. (2016). Manual imprescindible de Excel 2016.. _Anaya multimedia Marqués Asensio, Felicidad (2010). Modelos financieros a través de Excel. . San Fernando de Henares: RC Libros. Grau Fernández, L. y López Rodríguez, I. (2001). Problemas de Bases de Datos. Sanz y Torres. Mdrid Elmasri, Ramez; Navathe, Shamkant B. (2000). Sistemas de Bases de Datos. Conceptos fundamentales. Addison-Wesley. México Ramón Cardona, José; Bueno Ávila, Salvador; Bañuls Silvera, Víctor Amadeo; Fuentes Blasco, María (2011). Sistemas de Información Empresarial. Casos y supuestos prácticos. Granada: GEU O'Brien, J.A.; J.M. Marakas (2006). Sistemas de Información gerencial. Mexico: McGraw-Hill Gómez Vieites, Álvaro; Suárez Rey, Carlos (2004). Sistemas de información: herramientas prácticas para la gestión empresarial.. Madrid: RA-MA. Burrueco, Daniel (2016). Tablas dinámicas con Excel 2016. . Paracuellos del Jarama Madrid: Ra-Ma Menchén Peñuela, Antonio (2011). Tablas dinámicas en Excel 2010. Madrid: RA-MA

Complementary	Piattini Velthuis, M.; Peso Navarro, E. del; y Peso Ruís, M del (2008). Auditoría de Tecnologías y Sistemas de Información. RA-MA. Madrid Piattini Velthuis, M. G.; García Rubio, F. O.; García Rodríguez de Guzmán, I. y Pino, F. (2011). Calidad de los Sistemas de Información. RA-MA. Madrid Fernández Alarcón, V. (2010). Desarrollo de Sistemas de Información. Una metodología basada en el modelado. UPC. Barcelona Rumbaugh, J.; Jacobson, I. y Booch, G. (). El Lenguaje Unificado de Modelado. Manual de referencia. Addison Wesley de Pablos Heredero, Carmen; López Hermoso Agius, José Joaquín; Martín-Romo Romero, Santiago & Me (2021). Organización y transformación de los sistemas de información en la empresa. Madrid: ESIC Gallegos Ruiz, Amalia; Martínez López, Francisco Javier (2017). Programación de bases de datos relacionales. Madrid : RA-MA Editorial Areito, J. (2008). Seguridad de la Información. Redes, informática y sistemas de información. Paraninfo. Madrid Debrauwer, L. y Van der Heyde, F. (2009). UML 2. Iniciación, ejemplos y ejercicios corregidos. ENI. Barcelona Debrauwer, L. y Karam, N. (2010). UML 2. Practique la modelización. ENI. Barcelona Fowler, M. y Scott, K. (1997). UML gota a gota. Pearson. México Alarcón, R. (2000). UML. Diseño orientado a objetos con UML. Eidos. Madrid