The course is designed to systematically attend the face-to-face sessions and develop the proposed teaching activities, with a follow-up and/or evaluation of the same in these practical sessions.

The evaluation criteria for the second opportunity will be the same as those of the first opportunity, except for the tutored work, which will be evaluated only in the first opportunity, maintaining that qualification for the second opportunity, in the case of having to attend this one.

The academic waiver is accepted. This student, whose presence throughout the term is insufficient to perform the work or the follow-up of the work, will be evaluated with the same criteria as those of the second opportunity.

The evaluation criteria for the early December call will be the same as those of the second opportunity of the previous year.

The proven fraud in any work activity, test or evaluation will result in a failing grade of "0" in the work activity, test or evaluation in question.

The course is designed to systematically attend the face-to-face sessions and develop the proposed teaching activities, with a follow-up and/or evaluation of the same in these practical sessions. The special situations of students who, with recognition of part-time dedication and academic dispensation of exemption from attendance or for other duly justified reasons, cannot take the subject in person, must be communicated at the beginning of the term and adequately justified. The appropriate instructions will be given so that the student can follow the subject without problems, following up the teaching activities in tutorials.

The evaluation criteria for the December advanced call will be the same as those for the second opportunity of the previous year.

The fraudulent performance of tests or evaluation activities, once verified, will directly imply the qualification of failure in the call in which it is committed: the student will be graded with "suspense" (numerical grade 0) in the corresponding call of the academic year, whether the commission of the fault occurs in the first opportunity as in the second. For this, the student's grade will be modified in the first opportunity report, if necessary.

Learning outcomes	Study programme competences
RA6. Perform simulation and modeling for 3D design and prototyping of materials, as well as for the simulation of structures and manufacturing processes.	AJ6
RA10. Make adaptations of the object design taking into account the printing method used and the corresponding safety, efficiency and sustainability criteria.	AJ10
RA21. Apply reverse engineering techniques to reproduce elements by 3D printing.		BJ9
RA28. Design and redefine objects using parametric design tools for 3D printing.			CJ7

Topic	Sub-topic
1. DESIGN AND PRODUCT.	1.1. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. 1.2. INFORMATION PHASE. 1.3. CONCEPTUALIZATION PHASE. 1.4. DEVELOPMENT PHASE. 1.5. FINAL PHASE. 1.6. DOCUMENTATION. 1.7. PRESENTATION. 1.8. DRAWINGS.
2. GEOMETRIES IN ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING	2.1. Capture of geometries 2.2. Geometry manipulation. 2.3. CAD. Parametric and non-parametric modeling. 2.4. Export and exchange between CAD and CAM 2.5. CAM. Geometry lamination
3. STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS IN FA	3.1 General formulation of the finite element method. 3.2 Finite element modeling. Finite element families. Continuous and structural elements. Materials and mechanical properties. Assembly. Imposition of constraints. Interactions. 3.2 Finite element simulation. Imposition of loads and boundary conditions. Problem solving and evaluation of results.

Methodologies / tests	Competencies	Ordinary class hours	Student’s personal work hours	Total hours
Laboratory practice	A6 A10 B9 C7	15	15	30
Case study	A6 A10 B9 C7	1.5	2.7	4.2
Supervised projects	A6 A10 B9 C7	3.7	30.3	34
Objective test	A6 A10 B9 C7	1.5	2.7	4.2
Guest lecture / keynote speech	A6 A10 B9 C7	27.4	48.6	76

Personalized attention		1.6	0	1.6

(*)The information in the planning table is for guidance only and does not take into account the heterogeneity of the students.

Methodologies	Description
Laboratory practice	Methodology that allows students to learn effectively through practical activities such as demonstrations, exercises, experiments and research.
Case study	Group work technique that has as its purpose the intensive study of a subject. It is characterized by discussion, participation, elaboration of documents and conclusions to be reached by all the components of the seminar.
Supervised projects	Methodology designed to promote the autonomous learning of students, under the supervision of the professor and in various scenarios (academic and professional). It is primarily referred to the learning of "how to do things". It is an option based on the assumption by students of responsibility for their own learning. This teaching system is based on two basic elements: independent learning by students and monitoring of this learning by the teacher-tutor.
Objective test	Test based on the formulation of questions, with the objective of evaluating the knowledge, abilities and skills acquired in the subject through the answers.
Guest lecture / keynote speech	Oral exposition complemented with the use of audiovisual media and the introduction of some questions addressed to the students, with the aim of transmitting knowledge and facilitating learning.

Methodologies	Competencies	Description	Qualification
Supervised projects	A6 A10 B9 C7	The follow-up of the realization of the work is done in the practical sessions. The evaluation is done through the presentation of the tutored work.	30
Objective test	A6 A10 B9 C7	Test based on questions and answers structured in different parts.	30
Laboratory practice	A6 A10 B9 C7	It is necessary to attend systematically to the practices and to elaborate them during the practical sessions of the subject and in the assigned non face-to-face hours. The follow-up of the work is done in these practical sessions. The evaluation is done through the presentation of the internship reports.	40

Assessment comments
The course is designed to systematically attend the face-to-face sessions and develop the proposed teaching activities, with a follow-up and/or evaluation of the same in these practical sessions. The evaluation criteria for the second opportunity will be the same as those of the first opportunity, except for the tutored work, which will be evaluated only in the first opportunity, maintaining that qualification for the second opportunity, in the case of having to attend this one. The academic waiver is accepted. This student, whose presence throughout the term is insufficient to perform the work or the follow-up of the work, will be evaluated with the same criteria as those of the second opportunity. The evaluation criteria for the early December call will be the same as those of the second opportunity of the previous year. The proven fraud in any work activity, test or evaluation will result in a failing grade of "0" in the work activity, test or evaluation in question. The course is designed to systematically attend the face-to-face sessions and develop the proposed teaching activities, with a follow-up and/or evaluation of the same in these practical sessions. The special situations of students who, with recognition of part-time dedication and academic dispensation of exemption from attendance or for other duly justified reasons, cannot take the subject in person, must be communicated at the beginning of the term and adequately justified. The appropriate instructions will be given so that the student can follow the subject without problems, following up the teaching activities in tutorials. The evaluation criteria for the second opportunity will be the same as those of the first opportunity, except for the tutored work, which will be evaluated only in the first opportunity, maintaining that qualification for the second opportunity, in the case of having to attend this one. The evaluation criteria for the December advanced call will be the same as those for the second opportunity of the previous year. The fraudulent performance of tests or evaluation activities, once verified, will directly imply the qualification of failure in the call in which it is committed: the student will be graded with "suspense" (numerical grade 0) in the corresponding call of the academic year, whether the commission of the fault occurs in the first opportunity as in the second. For this, the student's grade will be modified in the first opportunity report, if necessary.

Basic	Dassault Systèmes Simulia Corp. (2014). Abaqus 2014 documentation . © Dassault Systèmes. Providence, RI, USA. Munari, Bruno (2016). Cómo nacen los objetos. Editorial GG - Gustavo Gili R. Gutiérrez, E. Bayo, A. Loureiro, LE Romera (2010). Estructuras II. Reprografía del Noroeste. Santiago de Compostela Bathe K.J. (2006). Finite Elements Procedures. Prentice-Hall, Pearson Education, Inc. USA Wong, Wucius (1995). Fundamentos del diseño. Editorial GG - Gustavo Gili (). http://reprap.org. Gebhardt, Andreas (2003). Rapid prototyping. Hanser Publishers Liou, Frank W. (2019). Rapid prototyping and engineering applications: a toolbox for prototype development. CRC Press Chee Kai Chua y Kah Fai Leong (2017). rapid prototyping principles and applications. World Scientific Cooper, Kenneth G. (2001). Rapid prototyping technology selection and application. CRC Press Shen, Janet & Walker, Theodore D (1992). Sketching and rendering for design presentations. Van Nostrand Reinhold Powell, Dick (1986). Técnicas de Presentación. Editorial Blume

Complementary	Eugenio Oñate (1995). Calculo de estructuras por el método de elementos finitos. CIMNE,Barcelona, España (). Rapid Prototyping Journal. Emerald