1.- Second oportunity:

A mixed test will be carried out in order to evaluate all the competencies and contents of the subject. The result obtained in this test will coincide with the final grade obtained by the student (100%)

2.- Advance exam

Only in this case will a mixed test be carried out in order to evaluate all the competencies and contents of the subject. The result obtained in said test will coincide with the final grade obtained by the student.

3.- Qualification of not presented:

It is up to the students:

A) Only participate in evaluation activities that have a weight of less than 20% on the final grade, regardless of the grade obtained.

B) Not appearing for the tests of the official evaluation period set by the dean's office.

4.- Students enrolled part-time and with “academic attendance exemption”:

They will have to communicate it to the teachers, before September 30. The same criteria will be followed as those used in the evaluation of the first opportunity, with the exception of the continuous evaluation: it is added in a single oral test that was carried out on the same date as the exam of the official evaluation period. A specific calendar of personalized attention compatible with the work plan of the subject and with its dedication will be agreed upon at the beginning of the course.

5.- Conditions for taking exams/tests:

1. It is prohibited to access the examination room with any device that allows communication with the outside world and/or the storage of information (except for those indicated by the teaching team).

2. Students will prove their identity in accordance with current regulations.

3. The fraudulent performance of tests or evaluation activities, once proven, will directly imply the qualification of suspension in the call in which it is committed: the student will be graded with "suspension" (numerical grade 0) in the corresponding call of the year. academic, whether the infraction is committed at the first opportunity or the second. To do this, it will proceed to modify its qualification at the first opportunity, if necessary.

4. The scoring criteria for each test will be announced at the time of its completion.

5. In exams/tests, if there are multiple choice questions, those answered incorrectly may be scored negative.ivamente

Learning outcomes	Study programme competences / results
Identify determining factors of dynamic and complex environments in the field of cooperation.	A1	B7
Assess the adequate structure and functioning of state and international organizations and institutions.	A2 A3
Apply the concepts and techniques to the analysis of the relationships between the actors involved in cooperation projects.	A8 A12	B2
Apply scientific methodology to the challenge of international project management.	A10	B5	C7 C9
Evaluate and resolve problems derived from cooperation.	A9
Apply appropriate work and analysis techniques and methods to cooperation projects.	A8	B5	C4
Identify the different aspects of the analysis of political, social and economic reality within the framework of international development cooperation.	A9 A11		C4 C5
Distinguish between the political, legal and economic instruments and mechanisms that guarantee efficient management of international cooperation projects.	A3 A8 A12	B7	C7

Topic	Sub-topic
Lesson 1. International cooperation interventions	Lesson 1. International cooperation interventions
Lesson 2. Typology of projects	Lesson 2. Typology of projects
Lesson 3. Project management life phases: Identification of a project	Lesson 3. Project management life phases: Identification of a project
Lesson 4. Project management life phases: Project formulation.	Lesson 4. Project management life phases: Project formulation.
Lesson 5.Project management life phases: Project monitoring.	Lesson 5.Project management life phases: Project monitoring.
Lesson 6: Project management life phases: Project completion.	Lesson 6: Project management life phases: Project completion.
Tema 7: Fases da vida da xestión do proxecto: Avaliación do proxecto.	Tema 7: Fases da vida da xestión do proxecto: Avaliación do proxecto.

Methodologies / tests	Competencies / Results	Teaching hours (in-person & virtual)	Student’s personal work hours	Total hours
Supervised projects	A8 A10 A9 A11 A12 B2 B5 B7 C4	2	52	54
Case study	A2 A1 A3 A8 A10 A9 A11 A12 C4	20	0	20
Aprendizaxe servizo	A1 B2 C4 C5 C7 C9	10	30	40
Objective test	A2 A1 A3 A8 A10 A9 A11 A12 B2 B5	2	4	6
Short answer questions	A2 A1 A3 A8 A10 A9 A11 A12 B2 B5	4	6	10
Guest lecture / keynote speech	A2 A1 A3 A10 A11 A12 B2	20	0	20

Personalized attention		0	0	0

(*)The information in the planning table is for guidance only and does not take into account the heterogeneity of the students.

Methodologies	Description
Supervised projects	The supervised work may have a theoretical approach or a practical approach, depending on the student's interests and the nature of the work. Depending on the complexity of the work, it will be decided whether it is carried out and presented individually or in groups. All teaching hours are in person.
Case study	Following the instructions of the problem solving methodology. Exercises, small assignments or practical cases will be formulated to be carried out in small groups of students (collaborative work) whose resolution will be presented orally. All teaching hours are in person.
Aprendizaxe servizo	Service-Learning (Learning-Service) is an educational proposal that combines learning processes and community service in a single well-articulated project where participants learn to work on real needs in the environment with the aim of improving it. All teaching hours are in person.
Objective test	1. It consists of a theoretical-practical examination of the contents of the subject. The exam may contain short questions, essay questions, questions about practical cases, multiple choice questions (true/false), multiple choice questions or a combination of the aforementioned types. 2. The exam may be oral or written, in person or virtual. 3. They will be held on the dates, times and classrooms (if in person) that the Dean's Office has officially established.
Short answer questions	1. There may be several throughout the course. They consist of an exam on a part of the subject and can be short answers, test type (true/false), multiple response, questions to be developed and questions about practical assumptions or a combination of them. 2.- They can be in person during class hours or online.
Guest lecture / keynote speech	1.- Presentation of the basic theoretical/practical concepts and content necessary for students to find solutions to the problems addressed in the program. 2.- The time dedicated to each of the topics into which the subject is divided will be proportional to the degree of difficulty of each of them. To prepare the chapters that are less difficult to understand, the student may be referred to the bibliography, although in that case the classes will guide them on which specific sources are recommended to be used. All teaching hours are in person.

Methodologies	Competencies / Results	Description	Qualification
Aprendizaxe servizo	A1 B2 C4 C5 C7 C9	The monitoring of the project will be carried out through a weekly report that the students must send to the academic tutor. The report must include the following: The actions carried out The actual improvements that occurred as a result of the intervention The ongoing procedures and the estimated completion date. The difficulties they encountered and how they were resolved. The comments of the people from the day center that coordinates the activity. The final report must also contain a personal evaluation of the student that shows the extent to which he or she put into practice the skills and knowledge acquired during the degree, as well as an overall assessment of the ApS methodology in general.	60
Objective test	A2 A1 A3 A8 A10 A9 A11 A12 B2 B5	1. It consists of a theoretical-practical examination of the contents of the subject. The exam may contain short questions, essay questions, questions about practical cases, multiple choice questions (true/false), multiple choice questions or a combination of the aforementioned types. 2. The exam may be oral or written, in person or virtual. 3. They will be held on the dates, times and classrooms officially established by the Dean's Office.	20
Short answer questions	A2 A1 A3 A8 A10 A9 A11 A12 B2 B5	1 It consists of an exam of a part of the subject and can be short answers, test type (true/false), multiple answers, questions to be developed and questions about practical assumptions or a combination of them. 2.- Short answer tests may be in person or virtual	20

Assessment comments
1.- Second oportunity: A mixed test will be carried out in order to evaluate all the competencies and contents of the subject. The result obtained in this test will coincide with the final grade obtained by the student (100%) 2.- Advance exam Only in this case will a mixed test be carried out in order to evaluate all the competencies and contents of the subject. The result obtained in said test will coincide with the final grade obtained by the student. 3.- Qualification of not presented: It is up to the students: A) Only participate in evaluation activities that have a weight of less than 20% on the final grade, regardless of the grade obtained. B) Not appearing for the tests of the official evaluation period set by the dean's office. 4.- Students enrolled part-time and with “academic attendance exemption”: They will have to communicate it to the teachers, before September 30. The same criteria will be followed as those used in the evaluation of the first opportunity, with the exception of the continuous evaluation: it is added in a single oral test that was carried out on the same date as the exam of the official evaluation period. A specific calendar of personalized attention compatible with the work plan of the subject and with its dedication will be agreed upon at the beginning of the course. 5.- Conditions for taking exams/tests: 1. It is prohibited to access the examination room with any device that allows communication with the outside world and/or the storage of information (except for those indicated by the teaching team). 2. Students will prove their identity in accordance with current regulations. 3. The fraudulent performance of tests or evaluation activities, once proven, will directly imply the qualification of suspension in the call in which it is committed: the student will be graded with "suspension" (numerical grade 0) in the corresponding call of the year. academic, whether the infraction is committed at the first opportunity or the second. To do this, it will proceed to modify its qualification at the first opportunity, if necessary. 4. The scoring criteria for each test will be announced at the time of its completion. 5. In exams/tests, if there are multiple choice questions, those answered incorrectly may be scored negative.ivamente

Basic	GÓMEZ GALÁN, MANUEL Y SAINZ OLLERO, HÉCTOR. (1999). El Ciclo del Proyecto de Cooperación al Desarrollo. La Aplicación del Marco Lógico.. Madrid. CIDEAL AGENCIA ESPAÑOLA DE COOPERACIÓN AL DESARROLLO (2007). Manual de Gestión de Evaluaciones de la Cooperación Española.. Madrid. Ministerio de Asuntos Exteriores MINISTERIO DE ASUNTOS EXTERIORES?SECIPI ( (2001). Metodología de evaluación de la cooperación española. Madrid. SECIPE AECI Agencia Española de Cooperación al Desarrollo (2000). Metodología de Gestión de Proyectos de Cooperación Española. Madrid. AECI AGENCIA ESPAÑOLA DE COOPERACIÓN AL DESARROLLO (2000). Metodología de gestión de proyectos de la Cooperación Española. Disponible :http//www.aeci.es

Complementary	GONZÁLEZ GÓMEZ, LARA (2005). La Evaluación en la Gestión de Proyectos y Programas de Desarrollo: Una Propuesta Integradora en Agentes, Modelos y Herramientas. Disponible en http://biblioteca.hegoa.ehu.es/system/ebooks/14809/original/La_evaluacion_en_la_gesti COMISIÓN EUROPEA (CE) (2001). Manual de Gestión del Ciclo del Proyecto. Disponible: http://europa.eu.int/europeaid/methods/PCM Manual Es. march2001