The following observations are made:

A) EVALUATION REGULATIONS:

1. Evaluation conditions: It is prohibited to access the exam room with any device that allows communication with the outside and/or storage of information, except in the case of online exams or so indicated by the teaching team.

2. Student identification: The student must prove her personality in accordance with current regulations.

B) TYPES OF RATING:

1. Qualification of not presented ("no presentado"): Corresponds to the student, when she only participates in evaluation activities weighted less than 20% on the final qualification, regardless of the achieved qualification.

2. Students with recognition of part-time dedication and academic waiver of attendance exemption: Students with recognition of part-time dedication, even if they are exempt from attendance, will be evaluated with the same criteria as full-time students.

C) EVALUATION OPPORTUNITIES:

1. First opportunity: the evaluation criteria previously indicated in this section will be applied.

2. Second Opportunity: The evaluation criteria are the same for all evaluation opportunities. In the evaluation of the second chance (article 18, section 5, of the Norms of Evaluation, Review and Claims of Qualifications of Bachelor and Master Studies) students will have the opportunity to take a final test, consisting of a mixed quiz, equivalent to 100% of the evaluation, in which the students must demonstrate that they have achieved the competences of the subject.

3. In Advance call: the conditions of evaluation of the advanced opportunity (art. 19 of the Norms of Evaluation, Review and Claims of the Qualifications of the Studies of Degree and Master) will be specific for this opportunity. This will be evaluated through a mixed test that will represent 100% of the final grade.

D) OTHER EVALUATION OBSERVATIONS:

1. Attendance at classes is mandatory for the assessment of the Mixec objective/subjecti e tests, that are carried out during the course.

2. To pass the subject it will be necessary to achieve a final grade (CF) of 5 out of 10.

3. The final exams (EX) will be graded out of 10, and a minimum of 5 points must be obtained to pass. In this case, the final grade will be calculated using the following formula: CF=EC+EX(10-EC)/10, where EC indicates the score obtained in the continuous evaluation during the course, which represents 30%, that is, a maximum of 3 points.

4. Detection of fraud, whether plagiarism or any other action will result in a final score of 0 points.

OTHER RECOMMENDATIONS:

1. The delivery of the documentary works carried out in this subject:

a. It will be requested in virtual format and / or computer support

b. It will be done through Moodle, in digital format without the need to print them

2. The importance of ethical principles related to sustainability values in personal and professional behavior must be taken into account.

3. Work will be done to identify and modify prejudices and sexist attitudes and the environment will be influenced to modify them and promote values of respect and equality.

4.It will facilitate the full integration of students who, for physical, sensory, psychological or sociocultural reasons, experience difficulties to an adequate, equal and profitable access to university life.

5. The principal of democratic debate will be supported in the class sessions: listening to and respecting all of the diverse opinions concerning the topics addressed, whether they are raised by teachers or students.

Learning outcomes	Study programme competences
The student will learn the basic concepts and relationships of Microeconomics.	A1 A2 A3 A4 A6 A7 A8 A9 A10 A11 A12	B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 B7 B8 B9	C1 C2 C3 C4 C8
To undestand the existing relations between the different main microeconomic variables.	A4 A5 A6 A7 A8		C1 C4 C6
Learn to work individually or in groups, independently and using various sources of information	A12 A13	B6	C1 C5 C7
To develop the students' critical awareness and the value of effort.		B9	C4 C6 C7 C8
Express critical and innovative thinking that allows efficient and versatile development of the profession while evaluating different normative and social welfare principles.	A1 A5 A6 A7 A9 A10 A11	B2 B3 B4 B6 B7 B9	C1 C2 C3 C4 C6 C8

Topic	Sub-topic
PART 1. INTRODUCTION	1. Introduction
PART 2. GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM	1. Competitive Markets and General Equilibrium
PART 3. MARKET POWER. MONOPOLY	1. Market Power and imperfect competition. 2. The social costs of monopoly power. 3. Natural monopoly and price regulation. 4. Price discrimination. 5. Monopsony and vertical chains.
PART 4. MONOPOLISTIC COMPETITION AND PRODUCT DIFFERENTIATION	1. Monopolistic competition. 2. Short and long run equilibrium.
PART 5. SOCIAL WELFARE. MARKET FAILURES. EXTERNALITIES AND PUBLIC GOODS.	1. Market failures. 2. Externalities. 3. Public goods.

Methodologies / tests	Competencies	Ordinary class hours	Student’s personal work hours	Total hours
Guest lecture / keynote speech	A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8 A9 A10 A11 A13 B2 B1 B3 B4 B5 B6 B7 B8 B9 C1 C2 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8	17	25.5	42.5
Problem solving	A1 A2 A3 A4 A8 A9 A12 A13 B1 B3 B8 C2 C6	10	15	25
Workbook	A7 A9 C2 C7	0	15	15
Objective test	B2 B1 B3 B4 B5 B7 B8 C3	4	32	36
Mixed objective/subjective test	A7 A9 A12 B1 B3 B5 C1	6	0	6
ICT practicals	A7 A9 A10 C2 C3 C6 C8	0	5	5
Seminar	A5 A12 B3 C1 C4 C6 C7 C8	4	4	8
Student portfolio	A5 B3 B5 C1 C8	0	4.5	4.5

Personalized attention		8	0	8

(*)The information in the planning table is for guidance only and does not take into account the heterogeneity of the students.

Methodologies	Description
Guest lecture / keynote speech	The teaching staff will explain each of the topics of the program. It consists on the exhibition of some contents by the teaching staff, complemented with audiovisual media and questions addressed to the students. They may be face-to-face or virtual.
Problem solving	Through this methodology, the goal is that the look for a solution to a specific problem or situation, based on the knowledge previously worked on, which may have more than one solution. This situation will be proposed in the form of the issues or practical questions that students have to answer. It is a complement to the theoretical knowledge acquired through lectures and study. The students will come to a solution applying their academic background in working environments, in which the intervention and personal contribution of the students is the central axis. They may be face-to-face or virtual.
Workbook	Some readings about academic or current texts, related to the content of the subject so that students can analyze, interpret and understand on the basis of more economic analysis tools, which are studied in the subject.
Objective test	This methodology consists of a test for learning assessment. It can combine different types of questions: multiple choice, ranking, short answer, discrimination, completion and/or association questions. It can also be made with just a kind of any of these questions. It may include both theoretical and practical questions or problems. Throughout the course, students must solve some objective tests. It can be done online through the Moodle platform or in person.
Mixed objective/subjective test	It may consist of problem-solving, short questions, essay questions or multiple-choice questions. Throughout the course, the students will solve some mixed tests. It can be done online through the Moodle platform or in person. This is a part of the continuous evaluation.
ICT practicals	Students will try to apply the use of ICT to learn effectively, through practical activities based on written, audiovisual and any kind of documentation related to the subject, through the use of information technologies and the communications. It is about expanding knowledge and obtaining information to facilitate autonomous learning and critical reasoning. The Moodle platform will be an essential vehicle for the application of this methodology.
Seminar	Lectures in small groups of students for detailed analysis of specific problems of the syllabus. They will be made virtually.
Student portfolio	Space for students to collect evidence of the work done

Methodologies	Competencies	Description	Qualification
Mixed objective/subjective test	A7 A9 A12 B1 B3 B5 C1	The knowledge and abilities shown by the students in the tests proposed by the teaching team will be valued. Some mixed tests will be done throughout the course. All these tests can be done in person or online through the Moodle platform. All these tests are a part of the continuous assessment.	25
Objective test	B2 B1 B3 B4 B5 B7 B8 C3	Knowledge acquired throughout the course will be valued. The test may consist of theoretical or practical questions. Some objective tests will be carried out throughout the course. All these tests can be done in person or online through the Moodle platform. This test will be held on the date established in the official academic calendar.	70
Student portfolio	A5 B3 B5 C1 C8	All proofs of the student's work through the course will be assessed. It is a part of the continuous assessment.	5

Assessment comments
The following observations are made: A) EVALUATION REGULATIONS: 1. Evaluation conditions: It is prohibited to access the exam room with any device that allows communication with the outside and/or storage of information, except in the case of online exams or so indicated by the teaching team. 2. Student identification: The student must prove her personality in accordance with current regulations. B) TYPES OF RATING: 1. Qualification of not presented ("no presentado"): Corresponds to the student, when she only participates in evaluation activities weighted less than 20% on the final qualification, regardless of the achieved qualification. 2. Students with recognition of part-time dedication and academic waiver of attendance exemption: Students with recognition of part-time dedication, even if they are exempt from attendance, will be evaluated with the same criteria as full-time students. C) EVALUATION OPPORTUNITIES: 1. First opportunity: the evaluation criteria previously indicated in this section will be applied. 2. Second Opportunity: The evaluation criteria are the same for all evaluation opportunities. In the evaluation of the second chance (article 18, section 5, of the Norms of Evaluation, Review and Claims of Qualifications of Bachelor and Master Studies) students will have the opportunity to take a final test, consisting of a mixed quiz, equivalent to 100% of the evaluation, in which the students must demonstrate that they have achieved the competences of the subject. 3. In Advance call: the conditions of evaluation of the advanced opportunity (art. 19 of the Norms of Evaluation, Review and Claims of the Qualifications of the Studies of Degree and Master) will be specific for this opportunity. This will be evaluated through a mixed test that will represent 100% of the final grade. D) OTHER EVALUATION OBSERVATIONS: 1. Attendance at classes is mandatory for the assessment of the Mixec objective/subjecti e tests, that are carried out during the course. 2. To pass the subject it will be necessary to achieve a final grade (CF) of 5 out of 10. 3. The final exams (EX) will be graded out of 10, and a minimum of 5 points must be obtained to pass. In this case, the final grade will be calculated using the following formula: CF=EC+EX(10-EC)/10, where EC indicates the score obtained in the continuous evaluation during the course, which represents 30%, that is, a maximum of 3 points. 4. Detection of fraud, whether plagiarism or any other action will result in a final score of 0 points. OTHER RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. The delivery of the documentary works carried out in this subject: a. It will be requested in virtual format and / or computer support b. It will be done through Moodle, in digital format without the need to print them 2. The importance of ethical principles related to sustainability values in personal and professional behavior must be taken into account. 3. Work will be done to identify and modify prejudices and sexist attitudes and the environment will be influenced to modify them and promote values of respect and equality. 4.It will facilitate the full integration of students who, for physical, sensory, psychological or sociocultural reasons, experience difficulties to an adequate, equal and profitable access to university life. 5. The principal of democratic debate will be supported in the class sessions: listening to and respecting all of the diverse opinions concerning the topics addressed, whether they are raised by teachers or students.

Basic	Varian, H.R. (1998). Análisis Microeconómico (3ª Ed.). Antoni Bosh Sanchez de Paz, E.; Novo-Corti, I. & Barreiro-Gen, M. (). Apuntes básicos para un curso intermedio de microeco . EDaSS - A Coruña Barreiro-Gen, M. & Novo-Corti, I. en Martínez Fernández et al (eds) (2016). Dixardin (Economía Social y creación de valor: casos prácticos de empresas). Galega de Economía Social Fernández de Castro, J.; Tugores, J. (1997). Microeconomía. McGraw-Hill Pindyck, Robert S.; Rubinfeld, Daniel L. (2013). Microeconomía. Pearson. Prentice Hall Krugman, P & Wells, R. (2013). Microeconomía. Reverté Goolsbee, A., Levitt, S. Syverson, C. (2015). Microeconomía. Reverté Carrasco A. y otros (). Microeconomía Intermedia. Problemas y cuestiones. McGraw-Hill Frank, Robert H. (). Microeconomía y Conducta (7ª Ed.). McGraw-Hill Perloff, J. (2019). Microeconomics. Pearson

Complementary	Gracia, Esperanza; Pérez, Rafaela (). Cuestiones Tipo Test de Microeconomía Intermedia. Prentice Hall Fernández de Castro, J.; Duch Brown, N. (). Economía Industrial. McGraw-Hill Schumacher, E.F. (2011). Lo pequeño es hermoso. Akal Puértolas, J y Llorente L. (2013). Micreoconomía Interactiva. Pirámide Estrin, Saul; Laidelr, David (). Micreoeconomía. Prentice Hall Datz, Nichael, L.; Rosen, Harvey L. (). Microeconomía. Adison.Wesley Iberoamericana Nicholson, Walter (). Microeconomía Intermedia y Aplicaciones. Thomson Congregado, E. y otros (). Microeconomía. Cuestiones y problemas resueltos. Prentice Hall Tugores, J.; Fernández de Castro, J. (). Microeconomía: Cuestiones y Problemas. McGraw-Hill Nicholson, Walter (). Teoría Microeconómica. McGraw-Hill