A) EVALUATION
NORMS

Conditions of final evaluation : Accusing the continuous activities
exercises/exam with devices that allow communication with the outside or that
stock information is not allowed. If a student is surprised by developing the
continuous activities exercises/exam by means of any fraudulent procedure, the
grade of such a continuous activity/exam will be cero in all opportunities.

Student identification : Student has to accredit his/her
identity in accordance with the current regulation.

B) TYPES OF GRADING

Non-presented grading : when the student participated in
less than 20% of the continuous assessment activities, regardless the obtained
grade.

Part time students : Both part time and full time
students are subject to the same evaluation system.

C) SECOND AND ADVANCED EVALUATION OPPORTUNITIES

Second and advanced opportunity : The
evaluation and grading criteria are exactly the same in all evaluation
opportunities.

The grade
of the continuous evaluation will be kept for the second opportunity, but in no
case for subsequent courses.

Students
may repeat the continuous evaluation activities in the second opportunity,
which may lead to a better, worse or equal grade than the one obtained for the
first opportunity. To do so, they will contact their lecturer well in advance
to plan the realization of these activities.

D) OTHER
EVALUATION NORMS :

The lecturers will make available the
norms for the development of the proposed works in this teaching guide to
students.

If a student does not attend at least
70% of the classes, the continuous assessment activities will not be able to be
evaluated.

To pass the subject, the final weighted
average grade must be equal to or greater than 5 points out of 10, but is an
essential requirement to obtain 4 points out of 10 in the objective test. If
this minimum is not reached in such as test, the subject will be suspended.

It is considered that a student is within
the continuous evaluation and, therefore, the previous evaluation scheme will
be applied to him/her, if he/she completed more than 20% of the works of the
subject. If such as student does not appear for the objective test, he/she will
be a grade of cero.

In case of academic fraud, the student will be
graded with "suspense" (numerical grade 0) in the corresponding call
of the academic year, whether the commission of the fault occurs in the first
opportunity as in the second. For this, the student's grade will be modified in
the first opportunity report, if necessary.

Learning outcomes	Study programme competences
Apply professional criteria-based on technical instruments- to the analysis of problems	A4 A7 A10	B2	C6
Assume the importance of lifelong learning as professional and citizen and to promote the values of effort, work, continuous training, and private initiative.		B3 B4	C4 C7 C8
To be able to make the presentation of a project based on economic-organizational analysis applied to a company, both orally and in a written form	A5 A6 A11 A12 A13	B5 B6	C1 C5
To be able to express themselves correctly in any of the oficial languages of Galicia, both orally and in a written form.		B6 B8	C1
Promote the development of active, educated, critical, committed, democratic and responsible citizens			C4
Understand both transaction and agency costs in the organizational limits as well as the variables related to the organizational analysis.	A1 A2 A3 A8 A9	B1 B7 B9

Topic	Sub-topic
Unit 1. Analysis of transactions costs	1.1. Concept of transaction costs. 1.2. Combination of human and environmental factors in the transaction costs. 1.3. Effect of transaction costs in the choice of market and organization.
Unit 2. Contractual process: an agency approach	2.1. The organization as a nexus of contracts. 2.2. Information and contractual problems. 2.3. Contractual solutions.
Unit 3. Organizational analysis	3.1. Introduction 3.2. Organizational design parameters 3.3. Contingency factors 3.4. Organizational archetypes

Methodologies / tests	Competencies	Ordinary class hours	Student’s personal work hours	Total hours
Seminar	A9 C1 C4 C5	4	4	8
Guest lecture / keynote speech	A1 A3 A8 B2 B3 B4 B7 B9	17	0	17
Supervised projects	A2 A4 A5 A6 A10 A11 A13 B1 B5 B6 B8 C7 C8	13	28	41
Objective test	C6	2	57	59
Document analysis	A3 A7 A12	4	17	21

Personalized attention		4	0	4

(*)The information in the planning table is for guidance only and does not take into account the heterogeneity of the students.

Methodologies	Description
Seminar	Tutorials in small groups to supervise essays and on going work during the course
Guest lecture / keynote speech	Presentation in the classroom of basic conceptuals items/definitions
Supervised projects	Group essay applying the theoretical concepts explained or service learning project
Objective test	Test exam
Document analysis	Find and analyze relevant information using ICT´s

Methodologies	Competencies	Description	Qualification
Supervised projects	A2 A4 A5 A6 A10 A11 A13 B1 B5 B6 B8 C7 C8	Project or final essay in group or service learning project	30
Objective test	C6	Test exam that will be developed on the date established in the official academic calendar	60
Document analysis	A3 A7 A12	Use of adequate information resources. Each group must present to the rest of the class a given theoretical concept	10

Assessment comments
A) EVALUATION NORMS Conditions of final evaluation : Accusing the continuous activities exercises/exam with devices that allow communication with the outside or that stock information is not allowed. If a student is surprised by developing the continuous activities exercises/exam by means of any fraudulent procedure, the grade of such a continuous activity/exam will be cero in all opportunities. Student identification : Student has to accredit his/her identity in accordance with the current regulation. B) TYPES OF GRADING Non-presented grading : when the student participated in less than 20% of the continuous assessment activities, regardless the obtained grade. Part time students : Both part time and full time students are subject to the same evaluation system. C) SECOND AND ADVANCED EVALUATION OPPORTUNITIES Second and advanced opportunity : The evaluation and grading criteria are exactly the same in all evaluation opportunities. The grade of the continuous evaluation will be kept for the second opportunity, but in no case for subsequent courses. Students may repeat the continuous evaluation activities in the second opportunity, which may lead to a better, worse or equal grade than the one obtained for the first opportunity. To do so, they will contact their lecturer well in advance to plan the realization of these activities. D) OTHER EVALUATION NORMS : The lecturers will make available the norms for the development of the proposed works in this teaching guide to students. If a student does not attend at least 70% of the classes, the continuous assessment activities will not be able to be evaluated. To pass the subject, the final weighted average grade must be equal to or greater than 5 points out of 10, but is an essential requirement to obtain 4 points out of 10 in the objective test. If this minimum is not reached in such as test, the subject will be suspended. It is considered that a student is within the continuous evaluation and, therefore, the previous evaluation scheme will be applied to him/her, if he/she completed more than 20% of the works of the subject. If such as student does not appear for the objective test, he/she will be a grade of cero. In case of academic fraud, the student will be graded with "suspense" (numerical grade 0) in the corresponding call of the academic year, whether the commission of the fault occurs in the first opportunity as in the second. For this, the student's grade will be modified in the first opportunity report, if necessary.

Basic	Cuervo García, Álvaro (2004). Introducción a la administración de empresas. Madrid: Civitas Mintberg, Henry (Varios). The structuring of organizations. Prentice Hal
	Cuervo García, A. (2004). Introducción a la administración de empresas. Madrid: Civitas. Mintzberg, H. (varios años). La estructuración de las organizaciones. Ariel. Diferent web sources that will be specified over the course
Complementary	Peris-Ortiz, M., Rueda Armengot, C., Souza Rech, G.C.D., Pérez Montiel, M. (20212). Fundamentos de la teoría organizativa de agencia. Información Comercial Española. Revista de Economía, 865, pp. 107-118