A) EVALUATION REGULATIONS:

1. Evaluation conditions: It is forbidden to access the exam room with any device that allows communication with the outside and/or storage of information.

2. Identification of the student: The student must bring and show his/her ID card or passport the day of the exam in accordance with current regulations.

B) TYPES OF GRADINGS:

1. "No presentado" grading: Corresponds to the student, when she only participates in evaluation activities weighted less than 20% on the final qualification, regardless of the achieved qualification.

2. Students with recognition of part-time dedication and academic exemption of waiver attendance: the evaluation will be done with the same contents and criteria as full-time students. At the beginning of the course, these students will address to the teachers of the subject to agree on a schedule of actions in order to enable the realization of the evaluation activities.

C) GRADING OPPORTUNITIES:

1. First opportunity: The evaluation of the first opportunity will be completely continuous based on a multiple choice test (60%) and the oral presentation (40%). In the case of multiple-choice test, the date of realization will be the official day settled for the first opportunity. The oral presentation projects will be during the lecturing period, according to the dates settled by the teachers of the subject. To pass the course it will be necessary to get a minimum of 5 points out of 10 in the overall calculation of the assessment, however it is a sine qua non condition to get 5 points out of 10 in the multipe-choice test. If this minimum is not reached in the test, the subject cannot be passed and the grade will be that of the exam.

2. Second opportunity: As for the second opportunity, the grades of the supervised project will be kept into account. In addition, whenever possible, the oral presentations may be recovered, if some students would not have done it. In that case, the student will address the teacher well in advance to indicate the desire to recover the work, which must be delivered and submitted before the date of the official examination of the second opportunity; if this is not possible due to issues of dates, or commitments of the teacher, the evaluation will consist only of a multiple-choice test, maintaining the weighting of 60%. To pass the subject, it will be necessary to obtain a minimum of 5 points out of 10 in the overall calculus, however it is a sine qua non condition to obtain 5 points out of 10 in the multiple-choice test. If this minimum is not reached in the test, the subject cannot be passed and the grade will be that of the exam.

3. Advance call: Students who take the exam in the advance call, the evaluation will consist in the realization of a test exam and to pass the subject the students must reach a minimum of 5 points out of 10.

D) OTHER EVALUATION OBSERVATIONS:

Learning outcomes	Study programme competences
To address the organizational problem as a problem of an economic nature. To identifying the most relevant dimensions in the study of organizational problems. To understand the company and, in a general way, the organizations as governance structures that function as an alternative way of organizing the economic activity through markets. To understand the functioning of the most relevant economic theories for the study and analysis of organizations, in particular, the transaction cost analysis and the agency theory. To detect, analyze, solve and communicate organizational problems, managing the concepts and theories of organizational economics. To realize that continuous education and knowledge are key to the best development of our lives and society. To instill ethical values as a guiding principle in behaviors as professionals and, above all, as citizens. To know how to work as a team. To encourage the use of ICT in personal communication tasks.	A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8 A9 A10 A11	B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 B7 B8 B9 B10	C1 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8

Topic	Sub-topic
MODULE I. INTRODUCTION	II.1. Introduction to orgnaizational economics II.2. Contracts and efficiency The specific contents of each module will be adapted to the singularities of each degree.
MODULE II. GOVERNANCE	II.1. Theoretical fundaments: transaction cost economics II.2. Applications: vertical integration The specific contents of each module will be adapted to the singularities of each degree.
MODULE III. INCENTIVES	III.1. Theoretical fundaments: agency theory III.2. Applications: pay for performance and corporate governance The specific contents of each module will be adapted to the singularities of each degree.

Methodologies / tests	Competencies	Ordinary class hours	Student’s personal work hours	Total hours
Document analysis	A5 A7 A10 A11 B3 B5 B8	2	10	12
Workbook	A11	0	8	8
Multiple-choice questions	A11 A8 B1 B2	3	75	78
Problem solving	A1 A2 A3 A4 A6 A8 A9 B4 B6 B7 C1 C5 C6	6	0	6
Oral presentation	A7 A8 A9 A10 A11 B4 B5 B9 B10 C4 C7 C8	1	17	18
Guest lecture / keynote speech	C4 C5 C7 C8	17	0	17

Personalized attention		11	0	11

(*)The information in the planning table is for guidance only and does not take into account the heterogeneity of the students.

Methodologies	Description
Document analysis	Research skills development involving use of audiovisual and/or bibliographical documents (documentary or film extracts, news items, advertising images, photographs, articles, legal texts, etc.) relating to specific topic of study, with targeted analysis activities. Used as introduction to topic, as focus for case study, to explain abstract processes and present complex situations, or as strategy for synthesising content (theoretical and practical).
Workbook	Compilation of printed texts and written documents, collected and edited as tool to consolidate knowledge of course content.
Multiple-choice questions	Objective test in which student is required to select one option from list of possible answers to direct question or incomplete statement provided.
Problem solving	Applied learning method in which student is required to use knowledge gained from study to propose a solution to a specific problem, where more than one solution may be possible.
Oral presentation	Core component of teaching-learning process involving coordinated oral interaction between student and teacher, including proposition, explanation and dynamic exposition of facts, topics, tasks, ideas and principles.
Guest lecture / keynote speech	Oral presentation (using audiovisual material and student interaction) designed to transmit knowledge and encourage learning. Presentations of this type are variously referred to as ‘expository method’, ‘guest lectures’ or ‘keynote speeches’. (The term ‘keynote’ refers only to a type of speech delivered on special occasions, for which the lecture sets the tone or establishes the underlying theme; it is characterised by its distinctive content, structure and purpose, and relies almost exclusively on the spoken word to communicate its ideas.)

Methodologies	Competencies	Description	Qualification
Multiple-choice questions	A11 A8 B1 B2	Multple-choice questions with penalties for incorrect answers.	60
Oral presentation	A7 A8 A9 A10 A11 B4 B5 B9 B10 C4 C7 C8	Oral presentation of two works complemented with the use of slides. 1st work related to transaction cost theory or an application of transaction cost theory (for example, vertical integration, hybrid forms of organization, organizational structure, etc.) 2nd work related to agency theory or an application of agency theory (eg incentives, corporate governance, etc.) The work will be done in groups.	40

Assessment comments
A) EVALUATION REGULATIONS: 1. Evaluation conditions: It is forbidden to access the exam room with any device that allows communication with the outside and/or storage of information. 2. Identification of the student: The student must bring and show his/her ID card or passport the day of the exam in accordance with current regulations. B) TYPES OF GRADINGS: 1. "No presentado" grading: Corresponds to the student, when she only participates in evaluation activities weighted less than 20% on the final qualification, regardless of the achieved qualification. 2. Students with recognition of part-time dedication and academic exemption of waiver attendance: the evaluation will be done with the same contents and criteria as full-time students. At the beginning of the course, these students will address to the teachers of the subject to agree on a schedule of actions in order to enable the realization of the evaluation activities. C) GRADING OPPORTUNITIES: 1. First opportunity: The evaluation of the first opportunity will be completely continuous based on a multiple choice test (60%) and the oral presentation (40%). In the case of multiple-choice test, the date of realization will be the official day settled for the first opportunity. The oral presentation projects will be during the lecturing period, according to the dates settled by the teachers of the subject. To pass the course it will be necessary to get a minimum of 5 points out of 10 in the overall calculation of the assessment, however it is a sine qua non condition to get 5 points out of 10 in the multipe-choice test. If this minimum is not reached in the test, the subject cannot be passed and the grade will be that of the exam. 2. Second opportunity: As for the second opportunity, the grades of the supervised project will be kept into account. In addition, whenever possible, the oral presentations may be recovered, if some students would not have done it. In that case, the student will address the teacher well in advance to indicate the desire to recover the work, which must be delivered and submitted before the date of the official examination of the second opportunity; if this is not possible due to issues of dates, or commitments of the teacher, the evaluation will consist only of a multiple-choice test, maintaining the weighting of 60%. To pass the subject, it will be necessary to obtain a minimum of 5 points out of 10 in the overall calculus, however it is a sine qua non condition to obtain 5 points out of 10 in the multiple-choice test. If this minimum is not reached in the test, the subject cannot be passed and the grade will be that of the exam. 3. Advance call: Students who take the exam in the advance call, the evaluation will consist in the realization of a test exam and to pass the subject the students must reach a minimum of 5 points out of 10. D) OTHER EVALUATION OBSERVATIONS:

Basic	Duma, S. y Schreuder, H. (1991). Economic approaches to organizations. Prentice Hall Milgrom, P. y Roberts, J. (1992). Economics, Organizations and Management. Prentice Hall Williamson, O.E. (1985). The Economic Institutions of Capitalism, New York:Free Press.. Macmillan

Complementary
	Dranove, M. Shanley y S. Schaefer (2003), Economics of Strategy. Third Edition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Brickley, J.A., Smith, C.W., Zimmerman, J.L. (2005), Economía Empresarial y Arquitectura de la organización. Ed. McGraw Hill Salas (1996), Economía de la empresa. Decisiones y organización. Ariel Economía. 2ª Edición. Williamson, O.E. (1975), Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust implications. Free Press, New York, NY. Traducido como Williamson, O.E. (1991): Mercados y Jerarquías: Su Análisis y sus Implicaciones Antitrust, México: Fondo de Cultura Económica