Identifying Data 2020/21
Subject (*) Final Dissertation Code 612G01031
Study programme
Grao en Dereito
Descriptors Cycle Period Year Type Credits
Graduate Yearly
Fourth Obligatory 6
Language
Spanish
Galician
English
Teaching method Face-to-face
Prerequisites
Department Dereito Privado
Dereito Público
Coordinador
Soto Díaz, David José
E-mail
david.sdiaz@udc.es
Lecturers
Aba Catoira, Ana Maria
Alvarez Barbeito, Pilar
Arean Lalin, Manuel
Arufe Varela, Alberto
Barrio Garcia, Gonzalo
Caamaño Anido, Miguel angel
Caamaño Domínguez, Francisco Manuel
Cachafeiro Garcia, Fernando
Calderon Carrero, Jose Manuel
Carou García, Sara
Castro Mejuto, Luis Fernando de
Cernadas Lázare, Marta
Colina Garea, Rafael
Collado Rodríguez, Noelia
Díaz Teijeiro, Carlos María
Ferreiro Baamonde, Xulio
Garcia Camiñas, Julio
Garcia Perez, Rafael
Garcia Vazquez, Sonia
Garcia-Pita y Lastres, Jose Luis
Garcimartin Montero, Carmen
Legeren Molina, Antonio
Lopez Suarez, Marcos A.
Martínez-Buján Pérez, Carlos
Neira Pena, Ana
Oanta Oanta, Gabriela Alexandra
Peña Lopez, Fernando
Pereira Saez, Maria Carolina
Quindimil Lopez, Jorge Antonio
Quintans Eiras, Maria Rocio
Ramos Vazquez, Jose Antonio
Raposo Arceo, Juan Jesus
Rodriguez Docampo, Maria Jose
Ron Latas, Ricardo Pedro
Roura Gomez, Santiago Antonio
Ruiperez y Alamillo, Javier
Ruíz García, José Ramón
Sanz Larruga, Francisco Javier
Soto Díaz, David José
Souto García, Eva María
Vazquez Pena, Manuel Jose
Vergara Lacalle, Oscar
E-mail
ana.abac@udc.es
pilar.alvarez@udc.es
manuel.arean@udc.es
alberto.arufe.varela@udc.es
gonzalo.barrio@udc.es
m.caamano@udc.es
f.caamano@udc.es
fernando.garcia@udc.es
jose.calderon@udc.es
sara.carou@udc.es
luis.decastro@udc.es
marta.cernadas.lazare@udc.es
rafael.colina@udc.es
noelia.collado@udc.es
carlos.diaz.teijeiro@udc.es
xulio.ferreiro@udc.es
julio.garcia.caminas@udc.es
rafael.garcia.perez@udc.es
sonia.garcia.vazquez@udc.es
j.l.garcia-pita@udc.es
carmen.garcimartin@udc.es
antonio.legeren@udc.es
marcos.lopezs@udc.es
c.martinez-bujan@udc.es
ana.neira@udc.es
gabriela.oanta@udc.es
fernando.pena@udc.es
c.pereira.saez@udc.es
jorge.quindimil@udc.es
rocio.quintans@udc.es
jose.ramos.vazquez@udc.es
juan.raposo.arceo@udc.es
maria.jose.rodriguez.docampo@udc.es
ricardo.ron@udc.es
santiago.roura.gomez@udc.es
javier.ruiperez@udc.es
j.ruiz@udc.es
javier.sanz.larruga@udc.es
david.sdiaz@udc.es
eva.maria.soutog@udc.es
manuel.jose.vazquez.pena@udc.es
oscar.vergara@udc.es
Web
General description O TFG supón a realización, por parte de cada estudante e de forma individual, dun caso práctico ou un informe xurídico concreto baixo a supervisión dun ou máis tutores.

Neste traballo deben integrarse e desenvolverse os contidos formativos recibidos, así como as capacidades, competencias e habilidades adquiridas durante o período de docencia do grao.
Contingency plan 1. Modificacións nos contidos
Non hai modificacións.

2. Metodoloxías
*Metodoloxías docentes que se manteñen
Todas.

*Metodoloxías docentes que se modifican
Ningunha.

3. Mecanismos de atención personalizada ao alumnado.

Utilización da Platafoma Microsoft Teams, correo electrónico e Moodle.

4. Modificacións na avaliación
Non hai.

*Observacións de avaliación: Non se varía o xeitio de avaliar pero a defensa pública farase a través da plataforma Microsoft Teams e non presencialmente.

5. Modificacións da bibliografía ou webgrafía
Non hai.

Study programme competencies
Code Study programme competences
A1 Knowledge of the main legal institutions
A2 Knowledge of the role of law as a regulatory system of social relations
A3 Grasping the systematic nature of the legal system
A4 Appreciating the interdisciplinary nature of legal problems
A5 Knowing the constitutional principles and values.
A6 Understanding the different manifestations of law in its historical evolution and in its current reality.
A7 Knowing the national and international legal and political structures.
A8 Basic knowledge of legal argumentation.
A9 Ability to handle legal sources (legal, jurisprudential and doctrinal).
A10 Ability to interpret and critically assess the legal system.
A11 Ability to understand and write legal documents.
A12 Management of legal oratory (ability to express themselves properly in public).
A13 Mastering new technologies applied to law.
A14 Ability to draft legal norms.
A15 Ability to negotiate and mediate.
B3 Ability to gather and interpret relevant data (usually within their area of study) to make judgments that include a reflection on social, scientific or ethical relevant issues.
B4 Ability to transmit information, ideas, problems and solutions to a specialized and non-specialized public.
B5 Acquisition and assessment of those learning skills necessary to undertake further studies with a high degree of autonomy
B7 Effective problem solving.
B8 Critical, logical, and creative thinking.
B9 Working autonomously on own initiative with a lifelong learning approach.
B11 Ethical and social responsibility.
C1 Adequate oral and written expression in the official languages.
C3 Using ICT in working contexts and lifelong learning.
C4 Exercising an open, educated, critical, committed, democratic and supportive citizenship for the sake of the common good.
C7 Assume as a professional and citizen the importance of lifelong learning.
C8 Valuing the importance of research, innovation and technological development for the socioeconomic and cultural progress of society.

Learning aims
Learning outcomes Study programme competences
Problem solving A1
A5
A6
A7
A11
A13
A14
A15
B7
B11
B3
B4
B5
C3
C7
Critical thinking B8
Working independently B9
Correct oral and written expression C1
Ability to analyse reality and solve problems C4
Assessing the importance of research and innovation in the socioeconomic and cultural advancement of society C8
Dealing with legal oratory A12
Ability to interpret and critically analyse the legal system A10
Ability to handle legal sources A9
Basic knowledge of legal argumentation A8
Perception of the interdisciplinary nature of legal problems A4
Perception of the systematic nature of the legal system A3
Understanding the function of Law as a system regulating social relations A2

Contents
Topic Sub-topic
For the TFG each student must individually complete a practical case or a specific legal report under the supervisions of one or more tutors.
The educational content received must be incorporated and developed in this work, as well as the knowledge, skills and abilities acquired during the teaching period of the degree.

Planning
Methodologies / tests Competencies Ordinary class hours Student’s personal work hours Total hours
Oral presentation A1 A5 A6 A7 A8 A11 A12 A13 A14 A15 B8 B11 B3 B4 B5 C1 C3 C7 1 6 7
Supervised projects A2 A3 A4 A10 B7 B9 C4 C8 0 50 50
Document analysis A9 A10 B9 0 75 75
 
Personalized attention 18 0 18
 
(*)The information in the planning table is for guidance only and does not take into account the heterogeneity of the students.

Methodologies
Methodologies Description
Oral presentation The students will defend their TFG publicly and face-to-face. If a student should request, providing reasons and justification, to defend their TFG in a distance rather than face-to-face manner, they will need to do so before the Study Programme Board, a department of the Governing Council, in order to authorise it or not. This will be done provided that the required legal, technical, administrative and economic conditions are met. The completion, presentation and defence of the TFG may be carried out in any of the languages using the teaching of the course, in accordance with the provisions of the degree verification report.
The panel will inform each student of the maximum amount of time they have to defend their TFG, during which they must set out the objectives, methodology, content and conclusions of their work. At the end the student must answer any questions put to them by members of the assessment panel and respond to any clarifications, comments and suggestions.
Supervised projects Methodology designed to encourage the students to learn independently, under the guidance of the tutor and in various settings (academic and professional). The main emphasis focuses on learning “how to do things”. It is an option based on students taking responsibility for their own learning.
This teaching system is based on two basic elements: the independent learning of the students and the monitoring of this learning by the teacher-tutor.
Document analysis The student must analyse the legal and caselaw sources in the appropriate way in order to rule on the case or to produce the proposed report correctly.

Personalized attention
Methodologies
Supervised projects
Description
The TFG will be led by a member of the teaching staff of the departments who teaches full-time in the degree study programme.
The teacher will be responsible for:
a) Explaining to the students whose tutoring encompasses the characteristics of the work, and guiding them in their development;
b) Monitoring the preparation of the TFG and ensuring that the established objectives are met;
c) Authorising the presentation and defence of the TFG.

Assessment
Methodologies Competencies Description Qualification
Oral presentation A1 A5 A6 A7 A8 A11 A12 A13 A14 A15 B8 B11 B3 B4 B5 C1 C3 C7 O alumno fará unha exposición pública oral ante o tribunal que avalía os traballos fin de grao no que exporá a metodoloxía empregada e a resolución da tarefa proposta 50
Supervised projects A2 A3 A4 A10 B7 B9 C4 C8 Calidad del trabajo presentado 50
 
Assessment comments
Once the student has presented the work, the panel will deliberate on the grade to be awarded to the student. The evaluation criteria of the teaching guide and the provisions of the degree verification report will be applied. The criteria will be made public before students defend their TFG. For the final mark, the arithmetic mean of the marks awarded to the TFG by each of the members of the panel will be established. In the last scheduled sessions the panel will apply the following criteria to the oral presentation: up to 20% for the TFG presentation and up to 30% for the questions and answers section.
The mark will be awarded based on the following numerical scale established in Royal Decree 1125/2003, from 0 to 10, with one decimal place, to which the corresponding qualitative mark must be added:

a) 0-4.9 fail
b) 5.0-6.9 pass
c) 7.0-8.9 good
d) 9.0-10 excellent

Students who achieve a mark equal to or greater than 9.0, according to the assessment panel’s criteria, may be awarded First Class Honours.

Any review and/or complaint regarding the final TFG marks will be addressed in accordance with UDC regulations.

Sources of information
Basic
Students should select the most appropriate doctrinal and caselaw sources for the case chosen in order to develop the TFG in the best way.
Complementary


Recommendations
Subjects that it is recommended to have taken before

Subjects that are recommended to be taken simultaneously

Subjects that continue the syllabus

Other comments
With regards the TFG, it is an indispensable requirement that the students have passed all the subjects of the Law Degree. The regulations allow the students to submit the TFG while they are still yet to pass some subjects, but they may only defend the TFG when they have passed all the subjects of the Law Degree.


(*)The teaching guide is the document in which the URV publishes the information about all its courses. It is a public document and cannot be modified. Only in exceptional cases can it be revised by the competent agent or duly revised so that it is in line with current legislation.