| Study programme competencies |
| Code | Study programme competences |
| Learning aims | |||
| Learning outcomes | Study programme competences | ||
| Students should be able to obtain, handle, organize and interpret data in linguistic and/or literary studies so as to be able to form judgements after reflecting on relevant topics in this field of studies. They should also demonstrate that critical, creative and logical thought processes have inspired them to produce their conclusions. | A1 A2 A6 |
B1 B3 |
C2 C6 C8 |
| Contents |
| Topic | Sub-topic |
| Specific contents will be agreed upon with the supervisor according to the TFG topic assigned. | To be arranged with the supervisor of the work. |
| Planning | ||||
| Methodologies / tests | Competencies | Ordinary class hours | Student’s personal work hours | Total hours |
| Supervised projects | A1 A2 A6 B1 B3 C2 C6 C8 | 10 | 120 | 130 |
| Oral presentation | A1 A2 A6 B1 B3 C2 C6 C8 | 1 | 9 | 10 |
| Personalized attention | 10 | 0 | 10 | |
| (*)The information in the planning table is for guidance only and does not take into account the heterogeneity of the students. | ||||
| Methodologies |
| Methodologies | Description |
| Supervised projects | Students will carry out the work under the supervision of a lecturer who will advise, check the ongoing work, and authorize its presentation and defence. |
| Oral presentation | On the day announced in the Faculty's academic calendar, students will present and defend their work before an assessment panel of lecturers appointed by the Faculty council, with a maximum duration of 20 minutes. |
| Personalized attention |
|
|
| Assessment | |||
| Methodologies | Competencies | Description | Qualification |
| Oral presentation | A1 A2 A6 B1 B3 C2 C6 C8 | The panel will assess the appropriate use of means and materials, clarity in the explanation, linguistic competence, the degree of conviction shown, and the answers to the lecturers' question. |
20 |
| Supervised projects | A1 A2 A6 B1 B3 C2 C6 C8 | The following criteria will be taken into account: - Formal aspects. Clarity and written text, information organization, bibliographical references, adherence to the recommendations in the official guidelines for the supervised project. 20 points - Structure. Organization of the different sections of the work. 25 points - Content. Abstract, theory and criticism, articulation and analysis. 35 points |
80 |
| Assessment comments | |||
|
<p>Any sign of plagiarism or similar dishonest behaviour will result automatically in failing the project.</p>
|
|||
| Sources of information |
| Basic |
Swales, John M. (1994). Academic writing for graduate students essential tasks and skills: a course for nonnative speakers of english.. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
Murray, Rowena. (2006). The handbook of academic writing: a fresh approach.. Maidenhead, England; New York: McGraw-Hill: Open University Press. |
|
|
|
| Complementary | |
|
A que recomendar o profesorado que supervise o traballo. |
| Recommendations | |
| Subjects that it is recommended to have taken before |
| Subjects that are recommended to be taken simultaneously |
| Subjects that continue the syllabus |
| Other comments | |
| <div><br /></div> |