Identifying Data 2019/20
Subject (*) Final Dissertation Code 613G03041
Study programme
Grao en Inglés: Estudos Lingüísticos e Literarios
Descriptors Cycle Period Year Type Credits
Graduate 2nd four-month period
Fourth Obligatory 6
Language
English
Teaching method Face-to-face
Prerequisites
Department Humanidades
Letras
Coordinador
E-mail
Lecturers
Alonso Giraldez, Jose Miguel
Barros Grela, Eduardo
Clark Mitchell, David Mitchell
Crespo Garcia, Maria Begoña
Estévez Saa, José Manuel
Fernández Ferreiro, Manuel
Floyd Moore, Alan
Frias Rudolphi, Maria
Gomez Blanco, Carlos Juan
Lezcano Gonzalez, Emma
Liste Noya, Jose
Lorenzo Modia, Maria Jesus
Moskowich-Spiegel Fandiño, Isabel
Nuñez Puente, Carolina
Perez Janeiro, Purificacion
Simal Gonzalez, Begoña
Sucasas Peón, Juan Alberto
Toro Santos, Antonio Raul de
Woodward Smith, Elizabeth Anne
E-mail
miguel.giraldez@udc.es
eduardo.barros@udc.es
david.clark@udc.es
begona.crespo.garcia@udc.es
jose.manuel.estevez.saa@udc.es
manuel.fernandez.ferreiro@udc.es
alan.floyd@udc.es
maria.frias@udc.es
carlos.gomezb@udc.es
emma.lezcano@udc.es
jose.listen@udc.es
maria.lorenzo.modia@udc.es
isabel.moskowich-spiegel.fandino@udc.es
c.nunez@udc.es
purificacion.pjaneiro@udc.es
begona.simal@udc.es
alberto.sucasas@udc.es
antonio.toro.santos@udc.es
elizabeth.woodward@udc.es
Web http://https://www.udc.es/export/sites/udc/filo/_galeria_down/TFG/normativa/Regulamento_TFG.pdf_2063069239.pdf
General description O traballo de fin de grao supón a realización, por parte de cada estudante e de forma individual,dun proxecto, unha memoria ou un estudo concreto baixo a supervisión dun ou máis directores. Neste traballo deben integrarse e desenvolverse os contidos formativos recibidos, así como as capacidades, competencias e habilidades adquiridas durante o período de docencia do grao. Máis información: https://www.udc.es/export/sites/udc/filo/_galeria_down/TFG/normativa/Regulamento_TFG.pdf_2063069239.pdf

Study programme competencies
Code Study programme competences

Learning aims
Learning outcomes Study programme competences
Students should be able to obtain, handle, organize and interpret data in linguistic and/or literary studies so as to be able to form judgements after reflecting on relevant topics in this field of studies. They should also demonstrate that critical, creative and logical thought processes have inspired them to produce their conclusions. A1
A2
A6
B1
B3
C2
C6
C8

Contents
Topic Sub-topic
Specific contents will be agreed upon with the supervisor according to the TFG topic assigned. To be arranged with the supervisor of the work.

Planning
Methodologies / tests Competencies Ordinary class hours Student’s personal work hours Total hours
Supervised projects A1 A2 A6 B1 B3 C2 C6 C8 10 120 130
Oral presentation A1 A2 A6 B1 B3 C2 C6 C8 1 9 10
 
Personalized attention 10 0 10
 
(*)The information in the planning table is for guidance only and does not take into account the heterogeneity of the students.

Methodologies
Methodologies Description
Supervised projects Students will carry out the work under the supervision of a lecturer who will advise, check the ongoing work, and authorize its presentation and defence.
Oral presentation On the day announced in the Faculty's academic calendar, students will present and defend their work before an assessment panel of lecturers appointed by the Faculty council, with a maximum duration of 20 minutes.

Personalized attention
Methodologies
Supervised projects
Description

The project (TFG) will be carried out under the careful supervision of the assigned lecturer.

Assessment
Methodologies Competencies Description Qualification
Oral presentation A1 A2 A6 B1 B3 C2 C6 C8 The oral presentation will be assessed by the panel according to the following criteria:
1. Presentation (35%)
. Adequate timing
. Clarity and structure
. Linguistic competence and adequacy

2. Content of presentation (35%)
. synthesizing skills
. explanation of relevant aspects

3. Replies to the panel's comments (15%)
. Adequate replies to all the comments and questions

4. Use of means and supporting materials (15%)
. effective and relevant use of audiovisual means and supporting materials
30
Supervised projects A1 A2 A6 B1 B3 C2 C6 C8 Assessed by the tutor of the work; the following criteria will be taken into account:

1. Formal aspects (20%).
.Adherence to the official norms for format
.Citation and bibiographical references
.General presentation of the text (examples, graphs, appendices, etc.)
.Linguistic accuracy

2. Content (60%)
. Structure: coherence and adequacy for the topic
. Clarity in the representation of arguments
. Selection and use of bibliography
. Results and conclusions according to the aims described

3. Writing process (20%)
. Organization, time management, autonomy

70
 
Assessment comments

The structure of the Final Dissertation will  comply with the following characteristics: 

 1. Cover, which must include the logo and name of the university, name of the faculty, name of the degree, title of the work, name of the author, handwritten approval of the supervisor together with his/her name, and the year presented. This page will not be numbered.

2. Table of contents, with page numbers.     

3. Summary of the work (approximately 500 words), including objectives, methodology, summing up of content, and conclusions.  

 4. Introduction, which must include the objectives of the work and an explanation and justification of the methodology used. 

 5. Main body of the work.  

6. Conclusions. 

 7. Works cited.  

 8. Appendices (if applicable).  

The Final Dissertation must be between 9,000 and 11,000 words long. The calculation of length will not include sections 1, 2, 3, 7, or 8.

A4 format must be used, with 2.5 cm margins, double space, and size 12 font. Sections 2 and 3 will be numbered using Roman numerals.

Any sign of plagiarism or similar dishonest behaviour will result automatically in failing the Dissertation.

Work may be tested through Turnitin in order to detect wrong citations, plagiarism or any other type of
fraud. Should this occur, the rules for plagiarism will be applied. (Normas de avaliación, revisión e reclamación das cualificacións dos
estudos de grao e mestrado universitario da UDC
). Turnitin recognises papers
previously turned in by other people (or the student himself/herself) at this university
or other universities, as well as other material found on Internet. 

 


Sources of information
Basic Swales, John M. (1994). Academic writing for graduate students essential tasks and skills: a course for nonnative speakers of english.. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
Murray, Rowena. (2006). The handbook of academic writing: a fresh approach.. Maidenhead, England; New York: McGraw-Hill: Open University Press.

Complementary

A que recomendar o profesorado que supervise o traballo.


Recommendations
Subjects that it is recommended to have taken before

Subjects that are recommended to be taken simultaneously

Subjects that continue the syllabus

Other comments
<div><br /></div>


(*)The teaching guide is the document in which the URV publishes the information about all its courses. It is a public document and cannot be modified. Only in exceptional cases can it be revised by the competent agent or duly revised so that it is in line with current legislation.