Study programme competencies |
Code
|
Study programme competences / results
|
A34 |
Ability to design, implement and develop sketches and drafts, concept designs, developed designs and technical designs (T) |
A39 |
Ability to remove architectural barriers (T) |
A50 |
Adequate knowledge of the methods of studying the processes of symbolization, practical functions and ergonomics |
A53 |
Adequate knowledge of the architectural, urban and landscape traditions of Western culture, as well as their technical, climatic, economic, social and ideological foundationsxicos. |
A55 |
Adequate knowledge of the relationship between cultural patterns and social responsibilities of the architect |
A63 |
Development, presentation and public review before a university jury of an original academic work individually elaborated and linked to any of the subjects previously studied |
B1 |
Students have demonstrated knowledge and understanding in a field of study that is based on the general secondary education, and is usually at a level which, although it is supported by advanced textbooks, includes some aspects that imply knowledge of the forefront of their field of study |
B2 |
Students can apply their knowledge to their work or vocation in a professional way and have competences that can be displayed by means of elaborating and sustaining arguments and solving problems in their field of study |
B3 |
Students have the ability to gather and interpret relevant data (usually within their field of study) to inform judgements that include reflection on relevant social, scientific or ethical issues |
B6 |
Knowing the history and theories of architecture and the arts, technologies and human sciences related to architecture |
B10 |
Knowing the physical problems, various technologies and function of buildings so as to provide them with internal conditions of comfort and protection against the climate factors in the context of sustainable development |
B12 |
Understanding the relationship between people and buildings and between these and their environment, and the need to relate buildings and the spaces between them according to the needs and human scale |
C1 |
Adequate oral and written expression in the official languages. |
C3 |
Using ICT in working contexts and lifelong learning. |
C4 |
Exercising an open, educated, critical, committed, democratic and caring citizenship, being able to analyse facts, diagnose problems, formulate and implement solutions based on knowledge and solutions for the common good |
C5 |
Understanding the importance of entrepreneurial culture and the useful means for enterprising people. |
C6 |
Critically evaluate the knowledge, technology and information available to solve the problems they must face |
C7 |
Assuming as professionals and citizens the importance of learning throughout life |
C8 |
Valuing the importance of research, innovation and technological development for the socioeconomic and cultural progress of society. |
Learning aims |
Learning outcomes |
Study programme competences / results |
Capacity to solve compositional design problems, taking different factors into account, being able to develop several options and choose the best result amongst them. |
A50 A53 A55 A63
|
B6 B10 B12
|
C1 C8
|
The capacity to understand, assimilate and work out spatial relationships using different principles of composition, particularly those developed by artistic avant-gardes and those related to contemporary philosophical, scientific and artistic movements. |
A34 A50 A55
|
B12
|
C7
|
The aptitude to depict accurately architectural elements as well as objects in relation to space. The ability to create a coherent link between architectural ideas and its materialisation. |
A50 A55
|
B1 B2 B3
|
C3 C4 C6 C8
|
The capacity to present conclusions orally and explain proposals and the reasons behind them. |
A63
|
B6
|
C1 C3
|
The competence to arrange compositions using platonic solid and elemental shapes. The aim is to build spatial relations that raise positive outcomes for people. The capacity to develop aesthetic sensitivity which designers need. |
A34 A39
|
B10
|
C5
|
Contents |
Topic |
Sub-topic |
Object and context |
- Anthropometric dimensions and environment
- Composition
- Architectural plan
- Architectural section |
Architectural object: circulation and disposal |
- Object in the context: interior and external
- Object as context: Tindaya
- Stairs: shapes
- Stairs: position
|
Object and place |
- Site plans representation.
- Thresholds: Inviting entrances.
- Urban context.
|
Planning |
Methodologies / tests |
Competencies / Results |
Teaching hours (in-person & virtual) |
Student’s personal work hours |
Total hours |
Guest lecture / keynote speech |
A50 A53 B10 B12 C1 C3 C4 |
10 |
10 |
20 |
Student portfolio |
B1 B2 B3 |
0 |
12.5 |
12.5 |
Workshop |
A34 A39 A50 A55 A63 B1 B2 B3 B6 B10 B12 C1 C5 C6 C7 C8 |
45 |
67.5 |
112.5 |
Objective test |
A63 B1 B2 |
4 |
0 |
4 |
|
Personalized attention |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
(*)The information in the planning table is for guidance only and does not take into account the heterogeneity of the students. |
Methodologies |
Methodologies |
Description |
Guest lecture / keynote speech |
The theoretical content delivered will help students to deal with the proposed works and to understand the learning aims.
Workshop practices are introduced as well.
During the lectures, the contents of each work will be further explained, along with group assessments.
Attendance acreditation: notes and sketches taken on your portfolios.
Homework hours: the keynote speech content will be extended with bibliographic references, personal notes, pictures or sketches. |
Student portfolio |
Notebook with blank sheets to be completed by the students with personal reflections, content from the lectures delivered, drawings and sketches of the workshop practices, etc. |
Workshop |
In workshop sessions diverse methods are merged to enhance learning (Individual and/or team work, presentations of the results, debates and analysis, as well as individualised tutoring). Students will develop design projects, helped by the teachers' support and guidance. The Design Workshop is planned for small groups. This workshop is the foundation of this subject. In the workshop scheduled time, students will develop their design work with the support and supervision of teachers.
Homework hours: students will review and complete their work.
Workshop attendance Accreditation: Delivery of hand-ins developed in each session. The teacher will keep a register of the works assessed. All students must personally assess their work with the teacher. |
Objective test |
At the end of the academic period, students must take a practical test in order to evaluate the skills achieved. Capacitiy and aptitudes in relation to the basics of architectural design are measured using this objective test.
Objective test preparation: development of workshop activities, attendance at keynote sessions, graphic analysis of referencial works of architecture, review of the work itself. |
Personalized attention |
|
Description |
WORKSHOP :
Personalised attention is an inherent charactersitic of this subject. All the students will have every piece of work commented on, and assessed by the teacher, from the first sketches to the final results. They will present their designs orally and individually, and have them analysed by the teacher. |
|
Assessment |
Methodologies
|
Competencies / Results |
Description
|
Qualification
|
Workshop |
A34 A39 A50 A55 A63 B1 B2 B3 B6 B10 B12 C1 C5 C6 C7 C8 |
Progressive, continuous and global assessment.
Pass conditions are:
1. Students are expected to hand in every scheduled piece of work. There must be a positive progression in our evaluation of their work.
2. Students are expected to attend every workshop session. A minimum of 80% attendance is required.
The assessment of the Design Workshop will take into account the student's personal work, supervised by the teacher.
Evaluation criteria:
- Layout composition.
- Adequate selection of the graphic content.
- Coherence between purpose and proposal.
- Precise graphic representation: adequacy of scale, enough information to define the space, spatial and mastering architectonic criteria (light, order, rythm, proportions) Orthographic projections (plans, elevations and sections) must agree.
- Line weight and types.
- Configuration and position of stairs, circulation paths and entrances.
- Accuracy and precision of anthropometric measurements.
- Implementation of theoretical contents delivered on lectures within the workshop practices
|
80 |
Guest lecture / keynote speech |
A50 A53 B10 B12 C1 C3 C4 |
Compulsory attendance. Global assessment will not be possible without attending 85% of the classes.
Lectures include theoretical content, giving exercises and appraisal sessions.
All master classes are considered those in which theoretical contents , explanations of jobs and collective opinions are held.
The keynote sessions will be recorded in a personal notebook (student portfolio) that will be reviewed periodically. |
1 |
Objective test |
A63 B1 B2 |
A test will be held on site, within a timeframe. Compulsory to pass a subject.
A minimun grade of 5 out of 10 is required in this test for an overall pass.
All the professors of the subject will constitute an Assessment Boart to evaluate the performance and grade the test of all students. |
10 |
Student portfolio |
B1 B2 B3 |
Personal notebook containing notes, sketches, drawings, pictures, plans and so on, reflecting the content of the lectures and the design process during the workshop and homework. |
9 |
|
Assessment comments |
General conditions to pass the course:
- Hand-ins of works: 100%. A maximum of 20% delivered with a fortnight of delay with respect to the scheduled date.
- Lecture attendance: 80%
- Student portfolio: It has to meet the requirements stated in the methodology and evaluation sections.
- Workshop attendance (three hours per week): 80%
FINAL EVALUATION:
A. OPPORTUNITY JUNE
Requirements: comply with the general conditions of follow-up of the course and get in the objective test the minimum score: 5 out of 10
B. OPPORTUNITY OF JULY.
B.1 Comply with the general conditions of follow-up of the course and get in the objective test the minimum score: 5 out of 10.
B.2 In the case of failure to comply with the general conditions of follow-up:
the minimum score on the objective test: 9 out of 10. In any case, the final mark will be of 5.0.
|
Sources of information |
Basic
|
Carreiro Otero, María (coord. (2006). Catálogo de puestos de feria : proyectos 1 : curso 2005-2006 (grupo María Carreiro) . A Coruña (consulta en biblioteca ETSAC).
Unwin, Simon (2003). Análisis de la arquitectura. Barcelona: Gustavo Gili
Ching, Francis D.K. (2010). Arquitectura: forma, espacio y orden. Barcelona: Gustavo Gili
Zell, Mo (2009). Curso de dibujo arquitectónico: herramientas y técnicas para la representación bidimensional y tridimensional.. Barcelona: Acanto
Ching, Francis D. K. (1999). Dibujo y proyecto.. Barcelona: Gustao Gili
Carreiro Otero, María (2007). El pliegue complejo. La escalera. A Coruña: Netbiblo
Panero, Julius y Martin Zelnik (2006). Las dimensiones humanas en los espacios interiores.. Barcelona: Gustavo Gili
Ching, Francis D. K. (2013). Manual de dibujo arquitectónico. Barcelona: Gustavo Gili
Roth, Leland (1999). Primera parte: los elementos de la arquitectura. Barcelona: Gustavo Gili
Carreiro, María et al. (2004). Proyectos 1. Curso 2003-2004. A Coruña: Universidade da Coruña (consultar Servicio de Reprografía)
Carreiro Otero, María (coord.) (2011). Proyectos 1. Diez lecciones.. A Coruña: Universidade da Coruña (consultar Servicio de Reprografía)
Ching, Francis D. K. (2011). Una historia universal de la arquitectura: un análisis cronológico comparado a través de las culturas.. Barcelona: Gustavo Gili
Munari, Bruno (1997). ¿Cómo nacen los objetos?. . Barcelona: Gustavo Gili |
Tódalas contempladas nas presentación incorporadas e nos documentos de información volcados específcamente cada curso na plataforma Moodle.
|
Complementary
|
(). . |
Outras referencias:
- Uderzo y Goscinny. "La residencia de los dioses" (cómic)
- La pirámide de Keops
- Proyecto de Eduardo Chillida para Tindaya
- Francisco de Goya: "Los fusilamientos de la Moncloa o El tres de mayo de 1808 en Madrid"
- Donald Judd: esculturas de hormigón
- Constantin Brancusi: "La mesa del silencio"
- Cristina Iglesias: Puertas en los Jerónimos (Museo del Prado)
- Cristina Ezcurra y Cristina Ouzande: proyecto para zona de juegos en Santiago de Compostela
Películas:
- "Caro diario", de Nanni Moretti
- "Al caer el sol", de Robert Benton
- "El crack", de José Luis Garci |
Recommendations |
Subjects that it is recommended to have taken before |
Descriptive Geometry/630G02003 | Introduction to Architecture/630G02005 | Drawing in Architecture/630G02002 |
|
Subjects that are recommended to be taken simultaneously |
Analysis of Architectural Forms/630G02007 | Architectural Form Geometry/630G02014 |
|
Subjects that continue the syllabus |
Architectural Design 9/630G02041 | Architectural Design 8/630G02036 | Architectural Design 5/630G02021 | Architectural Design 4/630G02016 | Architectural Design 2/630G02006 | Architectural Design 3/630G02011 | Architectural Design 7/630G02031 | Architectural Design 6/630G02026 |
|
Other comments |
- Drawing skills are a fundamental tool for this subject, so it requires special attention in order to acquire the appropriate level.
- Knowledge of modern theories about the Arts, Philosophy, and Science are considered to be highly useful, as they were essential for the avant-garde architecture from the twentieth-century. Interest in the Arts, including cinema and music, will be helpful as well
-Required aptitudes are intellectual curiosity, talent for observation, abstract spatial awareness and sensitivity
- Manual dexterity to build scale models is needed, being able to work with common materials to express different architectural intentions (heaviness/lightness, transparency/opacity, mass/emptyness, contrast…) is also fundamental. |
|