Assessment, as
a system for collecting information aimed at the issuance of value judgments
(and in its case of merit) on the learning process, requires continuous
development with constant student involvement. With this premise, the
attendance and participation of the student are understood as fundamental, so
that an unjustified and repetitive absence can have an unfavorable impact on
the grade obtained by the course, in a similar proportion to a lack of
participation or a negative attitude. The correction criteria include not only
the accuracy of the results, but also the clarity of the presentation, the
structuring of the analysis carried out, the use of units, the correct
application of the normative criteria, and the terminology used.

The continuous
evaluation system is configured with mixed tests (theoretical-practical exam)
that will be carried out during the school period, and workshop practice, each
of these items representing the percentage indicated above on the overall
grade.

In order to
carry out the intermediate mixed tests, the following are necessary
requirements:

· Having
delivered the student virtual card correctly within the stipulated period.

· Attendance
not less than 80% in the corresponding period, applicable in each of the
categories of face-to-face classes (expository, interactive and workshop). This
condition will not be required of students with part-time enrollment.

In order to
pass the subject per course, the following requirements must be met:

· Have
obtained in each of the intermediate mixed tests a rating of not less than 5
out of 10.

· Have
obtained a grade of not less than 1 out of 5 in the workshop exercise.

Students who
have not passed the subject per course will be retested for the pending parts (mixed
tests) in the two official opportunities of the same course. In both cases, the
grade obtained from the workshop will be kept, given that the delivery of this
exercise is unique, on the date defined for this purpose.

The students
who have passed the subject of projects 6, in order to approve structures 4,
will have to develop their workshop proposal on the subject developed in the
course in which they have passed projects 6, in any case requiring adequate
follow-up during the period of workshop teaching.

Any finding
of plagiarism or relevant breach of the conditions established for the
development of deliveries and/or exams will result in a failure grade (0) in
the matter and in the corresponding call, invalidating any assessment obtained
in all previous assessment activities, facing subsequent calls.

Learning outcomes	Study programme competences
Represent satisfactorily different typologies of reinforced concrete structures, in the field of construction and at the level of the execution project.	A12 A17 A18 A63	B1 B2 B3 B4 B6 B9 B11	C1 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8
Acquire basic knowledge regarding the physical and mechanical characteristics of reinforced concrete.	A17	B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 B9 B11
Know and know how to apply the calculation methods of reinforced concrete structures.	A12 A17 A18 A44 A63		C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8
Design and calculate different elements and structural systems in reinforced concrete, in the field of building.	A12 A17 A18 A44 A63	B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 B9	C6 C7 C8
Become familiar with the query, interpretation and application of current regulations in the field of reinforced concrete building structures.	A12 A17 A18
Be initiated in the use of computer applications for structural analysis, and basic tools linked to the implementation of information and communication technologies.	A12 A44		C3 C6 C7
To promote the development of autonomous capacities and attitudes (tendency to continuous learning, ability to solve problems effectively, analysis and synthesis capacities, organization and personal planning, productive information management) or collaborative (effective communication, behaviour based on shared responsibilities).		B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 B9 B11	C1 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8

Topic	Sub-topic
Typologies and representation	Structural typologies in reinforced concrete Representation of structural projects
Concrete typification	Constitutive materials Mechanical characteristics Durability Specifications
Calculation basis	Limit states Characteristic stress diagrams Regions B and D Strain domains
Uniaxial bending	Reinforcement arrangement Rectangle diagram Ductility limitation Dimensional charts Dimensionless abacuses T cross sections
Combined bending and axial load	Simple tension Simple compression Combined bending and tension Combined bending and compression Asymmetric reinforcement Symmetric reinforcement Instability
Unsymmetric bending	Dimensionless abacus on rosette Simplified method for reduction to uniaxial bending
Shear stresses	Resistant mechanism Treatment in regulation Shear resistance between concretes of different ages
Torsion	Main and secondary torsions Resistant mechanism Calculation procedure
Anchoring and splicing reinforcement	Corrugated bar anchor Anchoring of groups of bars Passive reinforcement splicing
Reinforcement arrangement	Beams reinforcement Pillars reinforcement Constructive solutions
Service limit states	Cracking Deformation Limitation by minimum height Limitation by height Calculation of deflections
One-way slabs	Features Typology Design considerations Ultimate limit states Service limit states Constructive aspects Pre-slabs, prestressed hollow core slabs and mixed solutions
Bidirectional slabs	Typology and constituent elements Design considerations Analysis Considerations Punching shear Constructive aspects
D regions	Strut and tie models Wall beams Short cantilevers

Methodologies / tests	Competencies	Ordinary class hours	Student’s personal work hours	Total hours
Guest lecture / keynote speech	A12 A17 A18 A44 A63 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 B9 B11	30	25	55
Problem solving	A12 A17 A18 A44 A63 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 B9 B11 C1 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8	13	48	61
Workshop	A12 A17 A18 A44 A63 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 B9 B11 C1 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8	12	15	27
Diagramming	A12 A17 A18	0	2	2
Mixed objective/subjective test	A17 A18 A44 A63 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 B9 B11 C1 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8	4	0	4

Personalized attention		1	0	1

(*)The information in the planning table is for guidance only and does not take into account the heterogeneity of the students.

Methodologies	Description
Guest lecture / keynote speech	A relevant fraction of the face-to-face activity uses the expository method, whose responsibility falls mainly on the teaching staff, either orally or with the addition of audiovisual media. However, and regardless of the above, during these sessions the aim is to achieve a certain quota of participation by the students, enhancing their involvement, promoting feedback on the process (and therefore the two-way nature of communication), and energizing the learning mechanisms through interaction techniques.
Problem solving	There will be practical tests, designed from the previously worked content, and which must be solved in a limited time. The progressive nature of such tests obeys the criteria of continuous evaluation, so that the conclusions of each phase can serve to redirect the teaching and learning processes appropriately, adapting them to the particularities of the group in order to achieve the intended competences.
Workshop	The subject participates in the 7th semester workshop, where Projects 6, Construction 5 and Urban Planning 4 are also integrated. The workshop is conceived as a work and exchange space designed to facilitate the confluence of the contents of the different subjects around the architectural project, and therefore is based on the multidisciplinary integration on the resolution of practical cases.
Diagramming	It is intended that the student develop the analysis and synthesis skills during the course through the preparation of synoptic documents. In this way, an attempt is made to reinforce meaningful learning through the structured synthesis of the main contents worked on. The elaboration is understood as progressive, continuously ordering concepts and expressions, outlining analysis processes, and influencing the deduction of possible relationships between the successive themes of the program.
Mixed objective/subjective test	Written tests are proposed as a diagnostic, formative and summative evaluation tool. The design adjusts in each statement to the profile of knowledge and abilities that it is intended to value, influencing the understanding of the theoretical contents and the skills associated with the analysis and resolution of practical cases.

Methodologies	Competencies	Description	Qualification
Mixed objective/subjective test	A17 A18 A44 A63 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 B9 B11 C1 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8	These tests will contemplate the resolution of theoretical-practical exercises and the development of certain aspects related to the project of building structures. Its configuration, as well as the appropriate qualification criteria, will be expressly defined in each statement.	80
Workshop	A12 A17 A18 A44 A63 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 B9 B11 C1 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8	The results obtained in the workshop will be assessed taking into account the complexity of the solution and its adequacy to the architectural proposal, as well as its development considering both the analysis and calculation aspects and the graphic representation.	20

Assessment comments
Assessment, as a system for collecting information aimed at the issuance of value judgments (and in its case of merit) on the learning process, requires continuous development with constant student involvement. With this premise, the attendance and participation of the student are understood as fundamental, so that an unjustified and repetitive absence can have an unfavorable impact on the grade obtained by the course, in a similar proportion to a lack of participation or a negative attitude. The correction criteria include not only the accuracy of the results, but also the clarity of the presentation, the structuring of the analysis carried out, the use of units, the correct application of the normative criteria, and the terminology used. The continuous evaluation system is configured with mixed tests (theoretical-practical exam) that will be carried out during the school period, and workshop practice, each of these items representing the percentage indicated above on the overall grade. In order to carry out the intermediate mixed tests, the following are necessary requirements: · Having delivered the student virtual card correctly within the stipulated period. · Attendance not less than 80% in the corresponding period, applicable in each of the categories of face-to-face classes (expository, interactive and workshop). This condition will not be required of students with part-time enrollment. In order to pass the subject per course, the following requirements must be met: · Have obtained in each of the intermediate mixed tests a rating of not less than 5 out of 10. · Have obtained a grade of not less than 1 out of 5 in the workshop exercise. Students who have not passed the subject per course will be retested for the pending parts (mixed tests) in the two official opportunities of the same course. In both cases, the grade obtained from the workshop will be kept, given that the delivery of this exercise is unique, on the date defined for this purpose. The students who have passed the subject of projects 6, in order to approve structures 4, will have to develop their workshop proposal on the subject developed in the course in which they have passed projects 6, in any case requiring adequate follow-up during the period of workshop teaching. Any finding of plagiarism or relevant breach of the conditions established for the development of deliveries and/or exams will result in a failure grade (0) in the matter and in the corresponding call, invalidating any assessment obtained in all previous assessment activities, facing subsequent calls.

Basic
	Proyecto de estructuras de hormigón armado. Martín, E.; Pérez Valcárcel, J. Reprografía del Noroeste. 2022. Jiménez Montoya esencial. Hormigón armado. Arroyo Portero, J.C. et al. Cinter Divulgación Técnica. 2018. Código Estructural. Real Decreto y Articulado (volumen I). Anejos 1-18 (volumen II). Dimensionado y comprobación de estructuras de hormigón (volumen III). Dimensionado y comprobación de estructuras de acero (volumen IV). Dimensionado y comprobación de estructuras mixtas (volumen V). Ministerio de Transportes, Movilidad y Agenda Urbana. 2022. Código Estructural. DAPP Publicaciones Jurídicas. 2021. Código Técnico de la Edificación. Documento Básico SE-A. DB SE. Seguridad estructural. Bases de cálculo. DB SE-AE. Seguridad estructural. Acciones. Ministerio de la vivienda. 2009. RC-16 Instrucción para la recepción de cementos. Ministerio de Fomento. 2016. Guía de aplicación de la Instrucción de Hormigón Estructural (EHE-08). Ministerio de Fomento. 2014.
Complementary
	Jiménez Montoya. Hormigón Armado. García Meseguer, A. et al. Gustavo Gili. 2009. Proyecto y cálculo de estructuras de hormigón. En masa, armado y pretensado. Calavera, J. Intemac. 2008. Patología de estructuras de hormigón armado y pretensado. Calavera, J. Intemac. 2005. Cálculo, construcción, patología y rehabilitación de forjados de edificación. Unidirecciones y sin vigas. Hormigón, metálicos y mixtos. Calavera, J. Intemac. 2002. Fichas de ejecución de obras de hormigón. Calavera, J. Intemac. 2009. Ejecución y control de estructuras de hormigón. Calavera, J. Intemac. 2004. Manual de detalles constructivos. Calavera, J. Intemac. 1993. Los pilares. Criterios básicos para su proyecto, cálculo y reparación. Regalado, F. Cype Ingenieros. 2001. Los forjados de los edificios. Pasado, presente y futuro. Regalado, F. Cype Ingenieros. 1999. Los forjados reticulares. Diseño, análisis, construcción y patología. Regalado, F. Cype Ingenieros, 2003. Biblioteca de detalles constructivos, metálicos, de hormigón y mixtos. Regalado, F. et al. Cype Ingenieros. 2004. Estructuras de hormigón armado. Tomo III. Bases para el armado de estructuras. Leonhardt, F. El Ateneo. 1990. Estructuras de hormigón armado. Tomo IV. Verificación de la capacidad de uso. Leonhardt, F. El Ateneo. 1985. Patología y terapéutica del hormigón armado. Fernández, M. Colegio de Ingenieros de Caminos, Canales y Puertos. 1994. Curso de hormigón armado según la EH-88. Rodríguez, L.F. Servicio de Publicaciones del Colegio Oficial de Arquitectos de Madrid. 1990. Construcción y cálculo en hormigón armado. López, M. Colegio Oficial de Aparejadores y Arquitectos Técnicos de Madrid. 1999. CYPECAD 2021. Diseño y cálculo de estructuras de hormigón basados en procesos BIM. Reyes, A.M. Anaya Multimedia. 2021.

Other comments
In order to achieve better learning in the workshop, it is understood that it is necessary to study simultaneously, and with due dedication, all the subjects that make up the workshop.