In the general evaluation of the course, the following aspects will be valued: attendance and participation in class and workshops and activities

- Class attendance: minimum 80% of expositive sessions and 80% of interactive sessions. In addition, the teaching staff will assess whether attendance is active by participating in the expository sessions (answering questions), in team or individual corrections. Active participation may be valued as an increase in the final grade.

The grade of the first opportunity will be "Not Presented" if you have not delivered any of the mandatory items. However, active participation in class, during the school period, that demonstrate adequate knowledge of the contents of the subject may be valued by the teaching staff.

For students with recognition of part-time dedication according to the "Norm that regulates the regime of dedication to the study of undergraduate students at the UDC" the minimum class attendance will be 50%, both in the interactive sessions and in the expository ones . The rest of the evaluation elements will be the same as in the general case. In relation to the final test, what is described in article 12 of the "Rules of Evaluation, Review and Complaint of the Qualifications of the Degree Studies and University Master of the UDC" (consolidated version 2017) will be followed.

Academic waiver: it is not contemplated, as it is a subject in which the workshop is the fundamental methodology.

The detection of plagiarism, as well as the fraudulent performance of tests or evaluation activities, once verified, will directly imply the grade of failing "0" in the subject in the corresponding call, thus invalidating any grade obtained in all evaluation activities. ahead of the extraordinary call.

Second opportunity:

In order to pass the subject on a second opportunity, it is necessary to repeat the evaluable items in which the pass was not achieved.

The tutored works would be re-elaborated, corrected or completed according to the indications of the tutors of the matter. For this, it is recommended that the teams make use of academic tutorials with their corresponding tutors during the second semester. The works will be delivered, at most, up to a week before the second chance exam.

Students who have not met the minimum attendance during the school period will not be eligible for a positive evaluation.

For everything else, the evaluation criteria for the second chance will be the same as for the first

Learning outcomes	Study programme competences
Ability to analyze and study the landscape and recognize its environmental and cultural values.	A34 A35 A41 A45 A47 A51 A52 A55 A58 A67 A69	B1 B2 B3 B4 B5	C1 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8
Ability to assess the environmental and landscape impact of the architectural and urban project (visual, water cycle, energy, mobility ...)	A2 A3 A4	B7 B8	C6
Knowledge of the relationship between society and landscape throughout history.	A44 A45 A46 A47
Effective integration of environmental and aesthetic criteria in the design of open spaces, streets, squares, parks and gardens.	A17 A19 A20 A36 A40 A53
Knowledge of urban and landscape ecology at the level necessary for collaboration in special and strategic plans, such as Green Infrastructures.	A40	B4 B5	C1 C5 C6
Know how to use the tools and methodologies of landscape analysis and environmental planning (spatial analysis, wind, solar radiation, comfort, microclimate ...)	A37 A39 A54 A57 A59	B6
Development of the capacity for critical and constructive observation in relation to the urban environment.	A57	B6 B7 B8

Topic	Sub-topic
BASIC PRINCIPLES AND INTRODUCTION	1. Presentation and general introduction to the course 2. Landscape and Sustainable Habitat: Introduction 3. Tools and methodology
LANDSCAPE	4. The landscape project 5. Theory and meaning in the landscape 6. Landscape in History
SUSTAINABLE HABITAT	7. Climate as a generator of landscape 8. Outdoor comfort 9. Energy and sustainable habitat 10. Blue and green infrastructure

Methodologies / tests	Competencies	Ordinary class hours	Student’s personal work hours	Total hours
Guest lecture / keynote speech	A51 A52 A53 A55 A58 A67 A69 B8	13	6.5	19.5
Document analysis	A40 B1 B2 C7 C8	1	0.5	1.5
Collaborative learning	A59 A57 A54 A47 A46 A45 A44 A41 A39 A37 A36 A35 A34 A20 A19 A17 B3 B4 B5 B6 B8 C1 C4 C5 C6	40	80	120
Events academic / information	C4 C5 C7	2	2	4
Introductory activities	A2 A3 A4 B7 C3 C5	2	2	4

Personalized attention		1	0	1

(*)The information in the planning table is for guidance only and does not take into account the heterogeneity of the students.

Methodologies	Description
Guest lecture / keynote speech	Each week, a topic will be introduced by the lecturers. The student will have to supplement this presentation with the reading of recommended bibliography extracts. Attendance to lectures is mandatory, with a maximum of 20% of unexcused absences admitted. Sessions will be strictly timely. The use of mobile devices (such as computers, tablets or phones) will not be allowed during the course of the class
Document analysis	An important part of coursework consists in selecting the relevant information and data. Therefore, the student should be familiar with the instruments of the discipline.
Collaborative learning	Collaborative learning aims to facilitate the visualization of the demands of the local community, in an inclusive and participatory way, in terms of the development of a landscape regeneration proposal.
Events academic / information	Preparation of material summarize the coursework for the end of year exhibition organized by the Department of Architectural Projects, Urban Planning and Composition: "Architectures in Course. DPAUC" (panels, models, drawings, videos, texts, performances , etc.). Attendance at dissemination events (congresses, seminars, symposiums, etc.), organized by ETSAC, or DPAUC, etc., indicated by tutors as part of the teaching content of the course, with the objective of providing students with knowledge and current experiences related to a particular field of study.
Introductory activities	The first two weeks of class will consist of the presentation of the contents, the development of the topic and the kick off team coursework

Methodologies	Competencies	Description	Qualification
Collaborative learning	A59 A57 A54 A47 A46 A45 A44 A41 A39 A37 A36 A35 A34 A20 A19 A17 B3 B4 B5 B6 B8 C1 C4 C5 C6	Evaluation of the project. A rubric will be used to evaluate the degree of achievement of the proposed objectives, in terms of the social need met, the skills acquired by students, their active participation and the dynamics of collaboration with the participating entities, dissemination. and projection, etc ... The implication and participation in the activities, the fulfillment of the deliveries and the quality of the elaborated material will be valued.	90
Events academic / information	C4 C5 C7	Preparation of material summarize the coursework for the end of year exhibition organized by the Department of Architectural Projects, Urban Planning and Composition: "Architectures in Course. DPAUC" (panels, models, drawings, videos, texts, performances , etc.).	10

Assessment comments
In the general evaluation of the course, the following aspects will be valued: attendance and participation in class and workshops and activities - Class attendance: minimum 80% of expositive sessions and 80% of interactive sessions. In addition, the teaching staff will assess whether attendance is active by participating in the expository sessions (answering questions), in team or individual corrections. Active participation may be valued as an increase in the final grade. The grade of the first opportunity will be "Not Presented" if you have not delivered any of the mandatory items. However, active participation in class, during the school period, that demonstrate adequate knowledge of the contents of the subject may be valued by the teaching staff. For students with recognition of part-time dedication according to the "Norm that regulates the regime of dedication to the study of undergraduate students at the UDC" the minimum class attendance will be 50%, both in the interactive sessions and in the expository ones . The rest of the evaluation elements will be the same as in the general case. In relation to the final test, what is described in article 12 of the "Rules of Evaluation, Review and Complaint of the Qualifications of the Degree Studies and University Master of the UDC" (consolidated version 2017) will be followed. Academic waiver: it is not contemplated, as it is a subject in which the workshop is the fundamental methodology. The detection of plagiarism, as well as the fraudulent performance of tests or evaluation activities, once verified, will directly imply the grade of failing "0" in the subject in the corresponding call, thus invalidating any grade obtained in all evaluation activities. ahead of the extraordinary call. Second opportunity: In order to pass the subject on a second opportunity, it is necessary to repeat the evaluable items in which the pass was not achieved. The tutored works would be re-elaborated, corrected or completed according to the indications of the tutors of the matter. For this, it is recommended that the teams make use of academic tutorials with their corresponding tutors during the second semester. The works will be delivered, at most, up to a week before the second chance exam. Students who have not met the minimum attendance during the school period will not be eligible for a positive evaluation. For everything else, the evaluation criteria for the second chance will be the same as for the first

Basic
	[B] Disponible en la biblioteca de la UDC Ábalos, I. (2008) Atlas pintoresco .Vol. 1: el observatorio. Gustavo Gili [B] Ábalos, I. (2008) Atlas pintoresco .Vol. 2: los viajes. Gustavo Gili [B] Ábalos, I. (2009) Naturaleza y artificio : el ideal pintoresco en la arquitectura y paisajismo contemporáneos. Gustavo Gili [B] Álvarez, D. (2007) El Jardín en la arquitectura del siglo XX . Editorial Reverté [B] Batlle, E. (2011) El jardin de la metrópoli. Gustavo Gili. Barcelona Dorothée, I. (1993) The modernist garden in France . Yale University (2008) Cusveller,S. Dijk,O. Schipper, K. ed. (2000) Remaking NL City, Landscape, Infrastructure. Amsterdam : S@M [B] Galí-Izard, T. (2005) Los mismos paisajes ideas e interpretaciones . Gustavo Gili [B] Jellicoe G. y S. (1995) El Paisaje del Hombre Barcelona G.G. [B] Laurie, M. (1995) Introducción a la Arquitectura del Paisaje Barcelona G.G. [B] Levy, Leah (1998) Kathryn Gustafson. Sculpting the land . Spacemakers Press [B] Lynch, K. (1980) La Planificación del Sitio Barcelona G.G. 1980 [B] McGrath, B. (2008) Digital Modelling for Urban Design . Wiley [B] Mertens, E. (2010) Visualizing Landscape Architecture . Birkhäuser [B] Molinari, L. ed. (2000) West 8 . Skira [B] Montero, M. I. (2001) Burle Marx el paisaje lírico . GG [B] Navés Viñas, F. (1992) El Arbol en la Jardineriay el Paisajismo Barcelona Omega 1992 [B] Nielsen, B. Dam, T. Thompson, L. (2007) European Landscape architecture:best practice in detailing. Rouletdge [B] Reid, G.W. (2002) Landscape Graphics . Plan, section and Perspective Drawing of Landscape Spaces. Watson Guptill. New York [B] Rodríguez Álvarez, J. (2015) Apuntes de paisaje: el análisis ambiental. Repronor [disponibles en reprografía] Shannon, K. Smets, M. (2010) The Landscape ofContemporary Infrastructure . Nai Publishers Simonds, J. O. (1978) Earthscape . A Manual of Environmental Planning. McGrawHill [B] Simonds, J.O. (1961) Landscape Architecture New York McGraw Hill 1961 [B] Steenbergen, C. (2008) Composing Landscapes . Analysis, Typology and Experiments for design. Birkhäuser Steenbergen, C. Reh, W. (2001) Arquitectura y Paisaje . La proyectación de los grandes jardines europeos. Gustavo Gili [B] Swaffield, S. (2002 ed.) Theory in Landscape Architecture . University of Pennsylvania PressVaccarino, R. (2000) Roberto Burle Marx. Landscapes Reflected . Princeton Architectural Press [B] Waterman, T. (2009) Principios Básicos de la Arquitectura del Paisaje . Nerea Académica [B]
Complementary
	[B] Disponible en la biblioteca de la UDC · Ábalos, I. (2008) Atlas pintoresco .Vol. 1: el observatorio. Gustavo Gili [B] · Ábalos, I. (2008) Atlas pintoresco .Vol. 2: los viajes. Gustavo Gili [B] · Ábalos, I. (2009) Naturaleza y artificio : el ideal pintoresco en la arquitectura y paisajismo contemporáneos. Gustavo Gili [B] · Álvarez, D. (2007) El Jardín en la arquitectura del siglo XX . Editorial Reverté [B] · As Paisaxes do Home · Bell, P.A. Greene, T.C. Fisher, J.D. Baum, A. (2001) Environmental Psychology. Harcourt [B] · Bell, S. (1999) Landscape : Patttern, Perception and Process. London E.& Spon [B] · Bruse, M. (v.2009) Envi-met 3.1 Manual · Celik, Z. Favro, D. Ingersotl, R. (1994) Streets. Critical perspectives on Public Space . University of California Press [B] · Constant, C. (1994) The woodland cemetery toward a spiritual landscape, Erik Gunnar Asplund and Sigurd Lewerentz, 1915-1961. Byggförlget [B] · Corner, J. ed. (1999) Recovering Landscape . Essays in Contemporary Landscape Architecture. Princeton University Press [B] · Forman, R.T.T. (1999) Land mosaics . The ecology of landscapes and regions. Cambridge University Press [B] · Givoni, B. (1998). Climate Considerations in Building and Urban Design . Van Nostrand Reinhold. [B] · Givoni, B. (1998). Climate Considerations in Building and Urban Design . Van Nostrand Reinhold. [B] · Habitar a paisaxe · Kirschenmann, J.C. (1984) Vivienda y Espacio Público. Rehabilitación Urbana y Crecimiento de la Ciudad. Gustavo Gili [B] · Krier, R. (2003) Town Spaces. Contemporary Interpretations in Traditional Urbanims. Birkhäuser · Laurie, M. (1995) Introducción a la Arquitectura del Paisaje Barcelona G.G. [B] · López de Asiaín, J. (2001) Arquitectura, ciudad, medio ambiente . Sevilla: Universidad de Sevilla [B] · Lynch, K. (1966) La Imagen de la Ciudad Ed. Infinito 1966 [B] · Lynch, K. (1980) La Planificación del Sitio Barcelona G.G. 1980 [B] · Marshall, S. (2005) Street Patterns . Spon Press [B] · McGrath, B. (2008) Digital Modelling for Urban Design . Wiley [B] · Mertens, E. (2010) Visualizing Landscape Architecture . Birkhäuser [B] · Montero, M. I. (2001) Burle Marx el paisaje lírico . GG [B] · Moughtin, C. (1992) Urban Design. Street and Square. Butterworth Architecture [B] · Nielsen, B. Dam, T. Thompson, L. (2007) European Landscape architecture:best practice in detailing. Rouletdge [B] · Pozueta Echavarri, J. dir. (2009) La Ciudad Paseable. CEDEX [B] · Prinz, D. (1983) Planificación y configuración Urbana Barcelona G.G. 1983 [B] · Reid, G.W. (2002) Landscape Graphics . Plan, section and Perspective Drawing of Landscape Spaces. Watson Guptill. New York [B] · Simonds, J. O. (1978) Earthscape . A Manual of Environmental Planning. McGrawHill [B] · Simonds, J.O. (1961) Landscape Architecture New York McGraw Hill 1961 [B] · Steenbergen, C. (2008) Composing Landscapes . Analysis, Typology and Experiments for design. Birkhäuser · Steenbergen, C. Reh, W. (2001) Arquitectura y Paisaje . La proyectación de los grandes jardines europeos. Gustavo Gili [B] · Szokolay, S. (1996). Solar Geometry. PLEA Note 1. PLEA International / University of Queensland. · Tillman Lyle, J. (1985) Design for Human Ecosystems . Landscape, Land Use and Natural Resources. Van Nostrand Reinhold Co. · Vaccarino, R. (2000) Roberto Burle Marx. Landscapes Reflected . Princeton Architectural Press [B] · Viljoen, A. ed. (2005) CPLUS Continuous Productive Urban Landscapes . Designing Urban Agriculture for Sustainable Cities. Architectural Press · Waterman, T. (2009) Principios Básicos de la Arquitectura del Paisaje . Capítulo 4. Representaciones. Nerea Académica [B] · Waterman, T. (2009) Principios Básicos de la Arquitectura del Paisaje . Nerea Académica [B] · Weilacher, U. (2008) Syntax of landscape . The landscape architecture of Peter Latz and Partners. Brikhauser [B] Bibliografía complementaria · Álvarez, S. (1991) Architecture and Urban Space Proceedings of the Ninth International PLEA Conference, Seville Spain September 24-27, 1991. Klwer Academic Publishers [B] · Anderson, S. (1978) On Streets . MIT Press · Chatzidimitriou, A. and S. Yannas (2004). Microclimatic Studies of Urban Open Spaces in Northern Greece . Proc. PLEA 2004, Eindhoven, Vol. 1 pp83-88. · Dorothée, I. (1993) The modernist garden in France . Yale University (2008) Cusveller,S. Dijk,O. Schipper, K. ed. (2000) Remaking NL City, Landscape, Infrastructure. Amsterdam : S@M [B] · Jacobs, A.B. (1993) Great Streets . MIT Press [B] · Jenks, M. and N. Dempsey (2005). Future Forms and Design for Sustainable Cities . Architectural Press. · Knaack, U. Klein, T. Bilow, M. (2008) Imagine deflateables . Delft University of Technology [B] · Levy, Leah (1998) Kathryn Gustafson. Sculpting the land . Spacemakers Press [B] · Lim, C.J. Liu, E. (2010) Smartcities+Eco-warriors . Routledge · Magalef, R. (1998) Ecología . Ediciones Omega [B] · Marshall, S. (2005) Street Patterns . Spon Press [B] · Molinari, L. ed. (2000) West 8 . Skira [B] · Reas, C. Fry, B. (2007) Processing : a programming handbook for visual desingers and artists.MIT Press [B] · Spuybroek, L. (2009 ed.) Research&Design: the architecture of variation . Thames & Hudson [B] · Staub, U. Geiser, R. (2008) Explorations in architecture : teaching, design research. Birkhauser [B] · Swaffield, S. (2002 ed.) Theory in Landscape Architecture . University of Pennsylvania Press · Terzidis, K. (2006) Algorithmic Architecture . Elsevier [B] · Yannas, S. (2000) Toward More Sustainable Cities. Solar Energy JournalVol. 70 No. 3 pp281-294,Elsevier Science Limited. · Yannas, S. (2000). Solar Control. En Designing for Summer Comfort . EC Altener Programme. Environment & Energy Studies Programme, AA Graduate School, London

Other comments
Owing to Higher Education regulations , the gender perspective must be incorporated in this subject