The criteria of evaluation are the same for each one of the opportunities of evaluation. It wants to this say that: 1) in both proofs of evaluation will take into account the qualifications obtained in the "Solution of problems"; 2) the corresponding examination to the mixed proof, in both opportunities of evaluation, describes on 5 points (50% of the final evaluation).

In the announcement advanced, and only in this case, will @realizar a mixed proof directed to evaluate all the competitions and own contents of the matter.

The criteria of punctuation of each one of the proofs will give to know in the moment of the proof and will supply together with the billed of this.

The test NOT done mark like zero. The qualification of "No Presented" will award to the student that have participated in less than 20% of the races for the final qualification. The made in fraud suppose the qualification of zero points in the final evaluation.

The only utensils which is allowed the access to the enclosure of the proof are the basic to answer to the examination: pencil, pen or feather, rubber to erase and electronic calculator no programmable.

It is on purpose forbidden the access to the enclosure of the examination with: to) mobile telephones and any one other able devices of communication to distance and/or of storage of information; b) aim, annotations, books or similar material that have not been on purpose authorised in the announcement of the examination or in the web page ( Moodle) of the subject. The no observance of this norm supposes the one who consider as @realizar the proof in fraud and this with independence that the one who have in the enclosure of the proof such devices or distinguished material have used them or no in the course of the same.

The student has to accredit his personality of agreement to the valid rule. For any another question no on purpose detailed in this guide will be to the had in the applicable valid rule to each case that pose.

Students with recognition of dedication part time and of dispense academic of assistance: Exception done of the dates approved by the Board of Faculty in what it competes to the objective proof, for the remaining proofs will agree to the start of the course a specific calendar of compatible dates with his dedication, reason whereby said students will have to put in contact with the professor in the first ten days of the cuatrimestre in that it gives the matter, with the purpose to fix said calendar. The proofs will have the same format that for the students with dedication to complete time.

Learning outcomes	Study programme competences
Know the aportación of the TIC to the business organization.	A1 A2 A3 A5 A10 A13 A14 A15 A18 A20 A21 A23 A24	B1 B2 B3 B4 B7 B8	C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8
Apply and use of TIC in the business field. Special consideration of the tools OAS in the Countable and Financial field.	A1 A2 A3 A5 A10 A13 A14 A15 A18 A20 A21	B5 B6 B9 B10 B11 B12 B13 B14	C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8

Topic	Sub-topic
1. The Systems of Information (SI) basic of a company.	- The Financial SI - The Commercial SI - The SI of Warehouses - The SI of Production - The SI of RRHH - The SI of support to it takes of decisions
2. Other Systems of usual Information in the business field.	- Documentary management - Management of projects - Management of Assets - Management of Cash
3. Practical applications for the business management in the fields reviewed like subtemas, with special consideration of the use of tools OAS.	- Financial analysis-countable - financial Calculation - The process of take of decisions - Audit and Internal Control

Methodologies / tests	Competencies	Ordinary class hours	Student’s personal work hours	Total hours
Guest lecture / keynote speech	A1 A2 A3 A5 A10 A13 A14 A15 A18 A20 A21 B6 B8 B9 B10	17	34	51
Problem solving	A1 A2 A3 A5 A10 A13 A23 A24 B2 B3 B4 B7 B11 B12 B13 C1 C2 C3	25	50	75
Seminar	A1 A3 A5 B14 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8	4	0	4
Mixed objective/subjective test	A1 A3 A5 A10 B1 B5	2	16	18

Personalized attention		2	0	2

(*)The information in the planning table is for guidance only and does not take into account the heterogeneity of the students.

Methodologies	Description
Guest lecture / keynote speech	1. Exhibition in the kinds presenciales of the theoretical and practical contents of the subject with the object to guide the student in his preparation. 2. The time devoted to each one of the chapters in that is divided the subject will be proportional to the degree of difficulty in the preparation of the same and to its extension, of way such that it will not devote the same time to each one of the chapters, but that will deepen more in ones that in others. All this, to trial of the professor that teach the subject. 3. For the preparation of the chapters of minor difficulty of understanding remit to the student to the bibliography, if well in the kinds presenciales to guide student about: a) which concrete sources recommend use b) which appearances are the more relevantes and of main interest with a view to achieve the results of the learning established for the subject. 4. Discussion, conjoint for all the groups of work, of the development encomendado to each one of the groups. The student can take part: to) to proper initiative, after asking turn of word; b) to initiative of the teacher, that will request on purpose the intervention of the student.
Problem solving	1. Elaboration, exhibition and solution of practical examples that the student, forming part of a group of work, has to realize along the course. 2. They will pose exercises and/or readings to realize by the student in hours no presenciales or of autonomous work. In hours presenciales back will do : to) a review of the exercises in which the student can take part in the terms described in the point 3 and b) of the readings will open the corresponding turn of questions to end to clear those appearances that the student pose on the content of the same. 3. The student can take part: to) to proper initiative, after asking turn of word; b) to initiative of the professor, that will request on purpose the intervention of the student.
Seminar	Discussion in groups reduced of the contents of the subject, in particular, of the works to that does reference the "Solution of problems". The student can take part: to) to proper initiative, after asking turn of word; b) to initiative of the professor, that will request on purpose the intervention of the student.
Mixed objective/subjective test	The student can take part: to) to proper initiative, after asking turn of word; b) to initiative of the professor, that will request on purpose the intervention of the student. 1. It consists in a theoretical examination-practical of the contents of the subject, with short questions, questions to develop, questions on practical suppositions, ask type test (true/false), questions of multiple answer or a combination of the types mentioned. 2. The examination can be oral or writing. Of not to publish at all in contrary in the page web of the asignatura (Moodle) with 48 hours of antelación, the examination will be written. 3. They will celebrate in the dates, hours and classrooms that the Decanato fix officially.

Methodologies	Competencies	Description	Qualification
Mixed objective/subjective test	A1 A3 A5 A10 B1 B5	1. It treats of an only proof for each one of the opportunities of evaluation of the announcement. 2. It consists in an examination following the exposed criteria in methodologies.	30
Problem solving	A1 A2 A3 A5 A10 A13 A23 A24 B2 B3 B4 B7 B11 B12 B13 C1 C2 C3	1. Preparation of one or more practical cases posed by the professor, in which they will develop any or some of the relative appearances to the content of the matter. 2. The works will develop in groups of 3 to 5 students. Exceptionally and previous approval by part of the teacher of the matter or of the Tutor of the group, will allow another number of students by group. 3. It forms essential part of the evaluation the discussion of the development of the same with the Professor of the matter or Tutor of the group of development that assign to the same. Thus, the presence in the meetings of follow-up of the work is essential to be evaluated. In no case it will evaluate to the student out of this context, without prejudice to the said in the points 4 and 5. Such meetings will take place so much in the "Session magistral" as in the "Seminar" and the own methodology of "Solution of problems", of way such that in the three methodologies will compute the discussions inside this 50% of evaluation. 4. For the evaluation according to this methodology will take into account: to) the work a) make in group; b) the discussion to that does reference the section 3 previous; c) the assistance to class and the effective and active participation in the same; d) the proofs, in his case, in reference to the point 5. 5. They form part of this methodology the proofs of continuous evaluation that, to criterion of the responsible Professor to give the matter, @realizar in the eagerness to see and evaluate the advances of the student. Such proofs can revestir the form of oral examination or writing, , with short questions, questions to develop, questions on practical suppositions, ask type test (true/false), questions of multiple answer or a combination of the types mentioned. 6. The works will go presenting, arguing and evaluating according to the calendar that to such end will publish in the web ( Moodle). 7. Any doubt about this section evaluativo has to solve sustentándose the solution in the idea of "continuous evaluation	70

Assessment comments
The criteria of evaluation are the same for each one of the opportunities of evaluation. It wants to this say that: 1) in both proofs of evaluation will take into account the qualifications obtained in the "Solution of problems"; 2) the corresponding examination to the mixed proof, in both opportunities of evaluation, describes on 5 points (50% of the final evaluation). In the announcement advanced, and only in this case, will @realizar a mixed proof directed to evaluate all the competitions and own contents of the matter. The criteria of punctuation of each one of the proofs will give to know in the moment of the proof and will supply together with the billed of this. The test NOT done mark like zero. The qualification of "No Presented" will award to the student that have participated in less than 20% of the races for the final qualification. The made in fraud suppose the qualification of zero points in the final evaluation. The only utensils which is allowed the access to the enclosure of the proof are the basic to answer to the examination: pencil, pen or feather, rubber to erase and electronic calculator no programmable. It is on purpose forbidden the access to the enclosure of the examination with: to) mobile telephones and any one other able devices of communication to distance and/or of storage of information; b) aim, annotations, books or similar material that have not been on purpose authorised in the announcement of the examination or in the web page ( Moodle) of the subject. The no observance of this norm supposes the one who consider as @realizar the proof in fraud and this with independence that the one who have in the enclosure of the proof such devices or distinguished material have used them or no in the course of the same. The student has to accredit his personality of agreement to the valid rule. For any another question no on purpose detailed in this guide will be to the had in the applicable valid rule to each case that pose. Students with recognition of dedication part time and of dispense academic of assistance: Exception done of the dates approved by the Board of Faculty in what it competes to the objective proof, for the remaining proofs will agree to the start of the course a specific calendar of compatible dates with his dedication, reason whereby said students will have to put in contact with the professor in the first ten days of the cuatrimestre in that it gives the matter, with the purpose to fix said calendar. The proofs will have the same format that for the students with dedication to complete time.

Basic	Piattini Velthuis, M.G. y otros (2007). Análisis y diseño detallado de aplicaciones informáticas de gestión.. Madrid: RAMA Aguiar Maragoto, F.J.; Martínez Fernández, P. (2012). Apuntes y transparencias publicados en la web (Moodle). González Babero, Manuela (2012). Conoce Microsoft Office Excel 2010. Madrid : Paraninfo GOMEZ GUTIERREZ, JUAN ANTONIO (2011). EXCEL 2010. AVANZADO. Madrid: RAMA Jelen, B.; Tracy Syrstad (2011). Excel 2010. Visual Basic para Aplicaciones. Madrid: Anaya Multimedia Orbegozo Arana, Borja (2012). Hojas de calculo con Excel y Calc : curso práctico avanzado. Tarragona : Altaria PALLEROLA COMAMALA, J. (2011). LAS MACROS EN EXCEL 2010. Madrid: RAMA Aguiar Maragoto, F.J.; Martínez Fernández, P. (2012). Links a páginas web suministrados en Moodle. Dubois, Paul (2008). MySQL. Addison-Wesley MENCHEN PEÑUELA, ANTONIO (2011). TABLAS DINÁMICAS EN EXCEL 2010. Madrid: RAMA Rubio Peinado, Vicente (2011). Visio 2010. Madrid: Anaya

Complementary