EVALUATION OF THE SUBJECT

1.- GENERAL EVALUATION CRITERIA: The final evaluation of the students
will be made according to the following criteria: 50% will correspond to
the continuous evaluation (5 points) and 50% to the evaluation of the
final exam (5 points).

2.-
CONTINUOUS EVALUATION: The final grade of the continuous evaluation of
the student is the average of the two grades, one by Prof. Santos del
Riego and another by Profª. Garcia Crespo, on an identical rubric for each teacher (5 points).

In
the continuous evaluation, each teacher will independently evaluate
what is expressed in the student evaluation rubric by the teacher,
namely:
- Making the group available documentation of the work to be
presented in advance.
- The organization and development of the subject (
Structure)
.
- The approach of the subject in an innovative and appropriate way to
the subject (content) .
- Communication skills, information transmission
in public and group management (exhibition) .
- The integration of the
knowledge addressed in The subject and the domain of the proposed theme.
The approved in this type of evaluation is set at 2.5 points resulting from the average of the qualifications of both teachers.

3.- EXAMINATION: The final mark of the exam is the average of the part
of examination done by each teacher evaluated on five points.It will be held
on the date indicated in the official calendar approved at the Faculty
Board, and will deal with the content addressed in the subject, both
those directed by teachers, and those discussed in the works exposed.
The one passed in the exam is set at 2.5 points resulting from the average of the qualifications of both teachers.

4.-
FINAL QUALIFICATION: The final grade will be the result of the sum of
both average marks (continuous assessment and exam), provided that the
student reaches the minimum of 2.5 points in each of the final grades
(continuous assessment and exam). If
this is not the case, the student will be suspended (or not presented, NP, as the case may be) with the
qualification determined by the teachers regardless of the final amount
obtained.

The qualifications may be reviewed in the terms and forms officially established; The continuous assessment and examination scores of both teachers, if possible, will be jointly reviewed.

The last contextual assessments on the final grades, prior to the
formalization in the computer application, is under the consideration of
the teacher responsible for the subject.

The
final grade of the subject will be expressed according to what is
established in article 5 of Royal Decree 1125/2003 of September 5, which
establishes the European credit system and the grading system in
university degrees of an official nature and Validity throughout the national territory (published in the BOE of September 18, 2003). Grading system: suspended (0-4,9), passed (5-6,9), remarkable (7-8,9), outstanding (9-10), matriculation of honor (graciable).

APPRECIATIONS ON EVALUATION:
In
the event that the student does not exceed only part of the assessment
(continuous assessment or examination):
- If the student exceeds the
continuous evaluation and suspends the examination, the subject will be
suspended (or not presented, NP, as the case may be) ,
But must only be submitted for examination in the following call.
- If
the student does not pass the continuous assessment and passes the exam,
the subject will be suspended (or not presented, NP, as the case may
be), but only have to present in the call Following a new work before the court, on the date that the teachers
set, within the evaluation period approved in the academic calendar of
the Faculty Board, in the shortest possible time from the date of the
examination.

If
the student does not pass either of the two parts (continuous
assessment and examination), he / she will be presented to both parties
in the following call: he / she must carry out a new work and present it
to the court on the date that the teachers determine, within the
approved evaluation period In the academic calendar of the Board of Faculty, in the shortest possible time from the date of examination. Likewise, it must also be submitted to the official examination on the
date indicated in the academic calendar approved at the Faculty Board.

ECOLOGICAL OBSERVATIONS.

In order to help achieve an immediate sustainable environment and
fulfill the strategic objective 9 of the Green Campus FCS Plan, the
documentary work carried out in this area:

La.- Majority will be requested in virtual format and computer support.

B.- On paper:

- No plastics will be used.

- Double-sided printing is performed.

- Recycled paper will be used.

- Drafts will be avoided.