Teaching GuideTerm
Faculty of Health Sciences
  Home | galego | castellano | english | A A |  
Grao en Terapia Ocupacional
 Subjects
  Work Placement II
   Assessment
Methodologies Competencies Description Qualification
Guest lecture / keynote speech A10 B3 The participation and interest of the student during the master sessions, the interventions made during the sessions and the observed evolution in the acquisition of knowledge will be assessed. It has MANDATORY CHARACTER. 10
Supervised projects B6 B7 B8 B9 B11 B15 C1 The planning of the intervention that the student develops and argues, the reflexive capacity and the logic of the thought and the theoretical criteria applied to real and everyday situations, the technical rigor of their proposals and the coherence in their reports will be evaluated.
The supervision of the supervised work will be done during the personalized tutorials, at the request of the teacher or the student. The tutorials demanded by the teacher have a MANDATORY CHARACTER.
50
Field trip A6 A17 A19 B31 The work developed in the field trips that the student will carry out autonomously or tutored (individually or accompanied by the other component of his / her work partner), the observation of the surroundings, the detection of the relevant factors for the Performance, and the ability to modify real environments to facilitate autonomy.
This assessment will be done in the personalized tutorials, which have MANDATORY CHARACTER.
40
 
Assessment comments
The subject of Practical Stays II deals with practical contents such as the observation and initial assessment, the planning of the intervention on the environment, and the recording of the information of the whole process. These contents will be worked as a group and individually, in an autonomous and supervised manner. Therefore, the subject is distributed in an autonomous work schedule to be carried out by the student (individually or in pairs), and in a class attendance time with the teachers of the subject, in the theoretical contents will be addressed, the planned practice will be carried out, and the autonomous practice of the student will be supervised. The final evaluation will include both autonomous work in the field and presencial.Los aspects and criteria that will be taken into consideration when evaluating planned activities with the previously proposed methodology are the acquisition of theoretical knowledge related to the subject, the application of that knowledge to the supervised practice, and the development of logical and critical thinking applied to concrete situations. Therefore, there will be a continuous evaluation of the evolution observed in the student, and an evaluation of the final works required to pass the subject. The student must submit a total of three final works, each corresponding to the teaching part of each teacher. The date of delivery will be duly notified to the students in advance (preferably at the beginning of the semester): - - Development of an infographic related to the concepts included in the Environmental Factors of the CIF or the contexts and environments of the Framework.
- Making an accessibility report on specific aspects of the Oza Campus environment.
- Argumented and critical reflection on a field trip or practice of evaluation of the home environment (pending planning during the semester).

The delivery of these three works on the proposed date is mandatory for the passing of the subject.

FINAL GRADING OF THE STUDENT
Attendance to class attendance is mandatory; This is a criterion required to overcome the matter, not valuable. IT IS COMPULSORY TO ATTEND AT 85% OF THE SCHOOL HOURS, ALLOWING THE ABSENCE AT 15%.
The final grade of the subject, over 10 points, will be distributed as follows:
a) Exposure of an infographic of contextual factors and delivery of an individual task (reflection on barriers and facilitators) (Professor Mansilla Barreiro): 3 points
b) Accessibility report Campus de Oza (professor García Crespo): 3 points
c) Critical reflection of the field output / assessment of home environment (Professor De Rosende Celeiro): 3 points
d) Continuous evaluation of the student by the three professors (evaluate the initiative, interest, critical participation and evolution in the acquisition of competences of the subject): 1 point

To pass the subject, the student must have presented the three required documents, reached a final grade of 5 points and have met the attendance criteria. If the student does not reach that minimum qualification, has not submitted the three documents required on the proposed date, or has not met the minimum compulsory attendance criteria, they will be entitled to a final written test that will be held on the date set in the academic calendar. official approved in Faculty Board.

The rating system will be expressed by numerical rating in accordance with the provisions of art. 5 of Royal Decree 1125/2003 of September 5 (BOE September 18), which establishes the European credit system and the system of qualifications in university degrees of an official nature and valid throughout the national territory. Grading system: 0-4.9 = Suspense 5-6.9 = Approved 7-8.9 = Notable 9-10 = Outstanding 9-10 Honors (Graciable)
Universidade da Coruña - Rúa Maestranza 9, 15001 A Coruña - Tel. +34 981 16 70 00  Soporte Guías Docentes