Proxectos Arquitectónicos, Urbanismo e Composición
Coordinador
Rodriguez Alvarez, Jorge
E-mail
jorge.ralvarez@udc.es
Lecturers
Diaz Revilla, Alfonso
Llamazares Castro, Jesus
Rodriguez Alvarez, Jorge
Seoane Prado, Enrique
E-mail
a.diaz.revilla@udc.es
j.llamazares@udc.es
jorge.ralvarez@udc.es
enrique.seoane@udc.es
Web
General description
Urbanism 5 is focused on the development of urban planning and design competences. For this reason, it follows an eminently practical orientation, addressing some of the most relevant issues in contemporary urban practice, not least aspects of sustainability, equality, management, economics as well as the legal framework and planning processes. Learning is structured around a series of practical exercises and course projects, in which the concepts and tools introduced in the lecture sessions are applied. The course project will address an unfinished area of the city, typically equivalent to a Not Consolidated Urban Land (in the planning jargon), in which an urban regeneration operation adapted to current and future conditions is relevant. The urban figure of reference will be the Special Interior Reform Plan (PERI), which should aim to provide this area with the necessary infrastructure, integration of uses and building types, based on the formalization of the public and private collective space, on the improvement of urbanization, and in the adequate response to existing conditions, through regenerative responses in its environmental and building aspects. The subject will also support the Workshop of the ninth semester, following the calendar, guidelines and exercises agreed with the subject Architectural Projects 8, which coordinates such Workshop.
Contingency plan
1. Modifications to the contents
-No changes are made
2. Methodologies
A. Teaching methodologies that are maintained:
-ANALYSIS OF DOCUMENTARY SOURCES.
-STUDY CASES
B Teaching methodologies that change:
- MASTER SESSION Adaptation of the traditional face-to-face to the non-face-to-face way through the Teams platform
-DIRECTED DISCUSSION. Adaptation of the traditional face-to-face to non-face-to-face way through the Teams platform and Moodle forums
-WORKSHOP. The supervision of this work will be carried out through the digital platforms provided by the UDC. (Teams) through tutorials agreed with each team
-OBJECTIVE TEST. The final objective test will not be carried out. The evaluation of this knowledge incorporates the methodology of the case study.
-PRACTICAL TEST. The final mixed test will not be carried out. The evaluation of this knowledge incorporates the methodology of the case study.
The mechanisms for personalized attention to students will be through Teams or Moodle
3. Mechanisms for personalized attention to students
- E-mail: Daily, Monday through Friday and during school hours. Useful for making inquiries, requesting virtual meetings to resolve doubts and following up on supervised work.
- Moodle: Daily, Monday through Friday and during school hours. According to the student's need. They have "thematic forums associated with the modules" of the subject, to formulate the necessary queries. There are also “forums for specific activities” to develop “Directed Discussions”, through which the development of the theoretical contents of the subject is put into practice.
- Teams: 1 weekly session in a large group for the advancement of the theoretical contents and supervised work in the time slot assigned to the subject in the school's classroom calendar. From 1 to 2 weekly sessions in small groups (up to 6 people), for follow-up and support in the performance of "supervised work". This dynamic allows a standardized and adjusted monitoring of the student's learning needs to develop the work of the subject.
4. Changes in the evaluation
Tutored works (100%): In relation to tutored works, the following will be valued:
- The methodological adaptation of the work proposals.
-The depth of the content.
-The domain of the applications used in the elaboration of the proposals.
-The treatment of a language of the disciplinary context.
- The use of complementary and current documentary sources.
- The presentation and clarity of the presentation.
* Evaluation observations:
They remain the same as in the tutorial, except that:
- References to the attendance count, which will only be made with respect to the sessions that have been carried out up to the moment the face-to-face activity was suspended.
1. SITUATIONS:
A) Full-time students:
Attendance / participation in class activities at least 80%:
a) Preparation and presentation of small group work (100%).
B) Students with recognition of part-time dedication and academic exemption from the attendance exemption, as established in the “RULE THAT REGULATES THE REGIME OF DEDICATION TO STUDY OF UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS AT THE UDC (Arts. 2.3; 3. be 4.5) (5/29/212):
Attendance / participation in class activities at least 80%:
a) Preparation and presentation of small group work (100%).
2. REQUIREMENTS TO EXCEED THE SUBJECT:
1. Attend and participate regularly in class activities.
2. Obtain a score of 50% of the weight of each of the parts to be evaluated.
3. Deliver and present the supervised work on the indicated date.
4. The July opportunity will be subject to the same criteria as the June opportunity.
5. Modifications to the bibliography or webography
No changes will be made.
(*)The teaching guide is the document in which the URV publishes the information about all its courses. It is a public document and cannot be modified. Only in exceptional cases can it be revised by the competent agent or duly revised so that it is in line with current legislation.
Subjects
