|
Teaching GuideTerm Higher Technical University College of Architecture |
| Grao en Estudos de Arquitectura |
 Subjects |
| Intervention in European Heritage |
| Assessment |
| Identifying Data | 2022/23 | |||||||||||||
| Subject | Intervention in European Heritage | Code | 630G02055 | |||||||||||
| Study programme |
|
|||||||||||||
| Descriptors | Cycle | Period | Year | Type | Credits | |||||||||
| Graduate | 2nd four-month period |
Fifth | Optional | 4.5 | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
| Methodologies | Competencies | Description | Qualification |
| Student portfolio | A5 A9 A14 A15 A16 A17 A18 A19 A20 A21 A23 A24 A25 A26 A27 A28 A29 A31 A34 A35 A36 A37 A38 A39 A40 A41 A42 A45 A46 A47 A48 A49 A52 A53 A54 A55 A56 A57 A58 A67 A68 A69 A71 A72 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 B7 B9 B10 B12 C1 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 | In the proposed works, and for the purposes of their qualification, aspects such as conceptual coherence, the technical level of the descriptions, documentary coherence, technical precision, personal contribution in the search and elaboration of the data and the clarity of the Se will value the graphic expression used, all this, the correct application of the criteria developed in the subject in terms of good practices of conservation and restoration of cultural heritage. | 15 |
| Guest lecture / keynote speech | A39 A40 A41 A42 A45 A46 A47 A48 A49 A53 A54 A55 A56 A57 A58 A67 A68 B7 B9 B10 B12 C1 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 | In the master sessions there will be a presentation of the topics with the support of image projection that illustrate the contents covered. | 5 |
| Objective test | A55 A56 A57 A58 A67 A68 A69 A70 A71 A72 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 B7 B9 B10 B12 C1 C3 C4 C5 C7 C8 | As it is a theoretical-practical subject, the continuous assessment method will be used, class attendance will be controlled and a part of the grade will be obtained from the attitude and work of the student throughout the semester; but it must be completed with the completion of at least one work of theoretical-practical content that allows to verify that the student has assimilated the conceptual and procedural contents of the subject. In the final evaluation of the student will take into account: -Attendance to class and interest and participation in face-to-face sessions. -The individual performance and exhibition of the proposed exercises. -The performance of individual and / or group work and its presentation and individual and / or group defense. -Any other activity that is detailed in the course's teaching guide - All this completes and contextualizes the objective test: written exam on the theoretical subject taught. |
80 |
| Assessment comments | |||
|
The student must attend mainly the master sessions (80% minimum), and present the proposed works with the required level of quality to pass the subject. To pass the subject, the student will have two opportunities (June and July). The teacher, according to the students, may choose to divide the exam into two parts. The work will be delivered in June and is essential to pass the course. If not delivered, the student will be graded as Not Presented. The grade obtained in the work (maximum 2) will be added to the one obtained in the written exams, as long as in each one of them a minimum score of 1.5 out of 4 is reached. will save to add it in the July exam. |
|||
|
