Teaching GuideTerm Faculty of Science |
Grao en Nanociencia e Nanotecnoloxía |
Subjects |
Work Placement |
Assessment |
Identifying Data | 2023/24 | |||||||||||||
Subject | Work Placement | Code | 610G04046 | |||||||||||
Study programme |
|
|||||||||||||
Descriptors | Cycle | Period | Year | Type | Credits | |||||||||
Graduate | 2nd four-month period |
Fourth | Obligatory | 6 | ||||||||||
|
Methodologies | Competencies / Results | Description | Qualification |
Supervised projects | A2 A3 A4 A6 A8 A9 A10 B2 B5 B9 B10 B11 B12 C3 C9 | In order to obtain academic recognition, provided that the stay fulfills the conditions specified in the regulations, the student must submit to the Dean's Office of the Center a detailed report of the work and activities carried out. Such report shall be prepared according to a model (ANNEX VII). The academic tutor will review the report issued by the student, making the pertinent recommendations and clarifications to correct and improve it. In view of these recommendations, the student will review the document and submit it to the Administration of the Faculty of Sciences together with a request for its evaluation. |
50 |
Summary | A2 A3 A9 A10 B2 B3 B4 B12 C1 C2 | The tutor appointed by the company or institution, who must be a senior graduate, preferably of the same degree or degrees related to that of the student, will prepare a final report, addressed to the Dean's Office of the Center (ANNEX IV), evaluating the degree of achievement reached by the student. | 50 |
Assessment comments | |||
The work done during the internship and the report on the internship will be evaluated as a whole. Students are recommended to consult the evaluation rubric published on the Center's website. Only those students who complete the period of work in the company/institution (supervised work) and submit the summary report of the tasks for evaluation may obtain a grade higher than 4.5 (out of 10). Students who do not complete the period of work in the company/institution will receive a qualification proportional to the hours worked, always lower than 4.5 (out of 10). In the case of not being able to complete the work period due to force majeure, the student may plead before the dean of the center, who may suspend the effect of this evaluation rule. |
|