The evaluation of the subject will consist of two distinct parts: theory (50%) and practical work (50%). The theoretical part will be evaluated through an examination that may consist of a work of analysis of scientific bibliography related to the subject of the subject, presented orally on the day of the final exam. The practical part will be evaluated from the average of the memoirs presented at the end of each practice. It will be necessary to approve the theory and practice part separately in order to approve the matter.
Attendance to both theoretical and practical classes will be mandatory for the approval of the subject except in cases of justified absence. For those students who have a dispensation, the evaluation system will be the same although they will not have an obligation to attend theoretical classes.
Second-chance assessment: Students must recover each suspended part (theory and practices). If one of the two parties has been approved during the first opportunity, the student may choose to save the corresponding note and only recover the suspended part.
Students will be assessed as "unpresented" when they do not present the theory analysis work or any of the practice memoirs.
The competences of the subject as well as the general-basic competences have specific contents in the subject that are introduced, as indicated, both in the exhibition and interactive classes. Subsequently, the students will develop these skills in the theoretical exam and with the realization of the practical work in which the cross-border competences will also work, especially with regard to the ability to use ICT tools (CT3), the understanding of entrepreneurial culture (CT5), the ability to work in a team (CT7) and the valorization of research and innovation (CT8). The specific competences will be evaluated both in the practical work that the student develops during the subject and in the theoretical exam.
For cases of fraudulent performance of exercises or tests, the provisions of the "Regulation of evaluation of academic performance of students and review of qualifications" will apply.

In the case of plagiarism in internships
or teaching works delivered, article 11(4)(b) of the UDC Student Disciplinary
Regulations shall be taken into account:

(b) Qualification of failed in the call in
the subject in which it was committed is committed: the student shall be
qualified with "failed" (numerical grade of 0) in the corresponding
call for the academic year, whether the commission of the default occurs at the
first opportunity or the second. To do so, you will be able to change your
qualification in the first opportunity minutes, if necessary.

The evaluation in the extraordinary call
will equivalent to that of the other calls.

Students who receive partial tuition/
dispensation may agree with the teacher the possibility of doing alternative
activities in person.