| Document analysis |
A10 A11 A46 A51 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 B8 B9 B10 B12 B14 B15 B16 B22 B25 B27 B29 C2 C3 C5 C6 C13 |
The analysis of the documentary sources is the basis for carrying out the supervised academic work, so it does not have an independent qualification. |
10 |
| Supervised projects |
A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8 A9 A10 A11 A12 A13 A14 A15 A16 A17 A18 A19 A20 A21 A22 A23 A24 A25 A26 A27 A28 A29 A30 A31 A32 A33 A34 A35 A36 A37 A38 A39 A40 A41 A42 A43 A44 A45 A46 A47 A48 A49 A50 A51 A52 A53 B1 B2 B3 B5 B8 B9 B10 B12 B13 B14 B15 B16 B17 B18 B19 B20 B21 B22 B23 B24 B25 B26 B27 B28 C1 C2 C3 C4 C6 C7 C8 C9 C10 C11 C13 |
Aspects related to the writing and written presentation of the supervised academic work will be valued, such as its adjustment to the norms established in the regulation, the relevance of the treated topic or its transversality. |
50 |
The fraudulent completion of exams or assessment activities, once confirmed, will result directly in a failing grade in the respective exam session: the student will be graded as "fail" (numerical grade of 0) in the corresponding academic year's exam session, whether the misconduct occurs in the first opportunity or the second. In this regard, their grade will be modified in the first opportunity's record, if necessary. |
Subjects