Teaching GuideTerm Faculty of Educational Studies |
Grao en Educación Primaria |
Subjects |
Education in Mathematics I |
Assessment |
|
|
Identifying Data | 2023/24 | |||||||||||||
Subject | Education in Mathematics I | Code | 652G02008 | |||||||||||
Study programme |
|
|||||||||||||
Descriptors | Cycle | Period | Year | Type | Credits | |||||||||
Graduate | 2nd four-month period |
First | Obligatory | 6 | ||||||||||
|
Methodologies | Competencies / Results | Description | Qualification |
Laboratory practice | A33 A34 A35 A38 A39 A42 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B8 B9 B11 B12 B15 B18 B19 C1 C3 C6 C7 C8 | Resolution of the different group activities, issues and problems proposed in laboratory practices, submitted in time and form. The ability to analyze, the argumentation rigor in argument, accuracy, and clarity of exposure, will be taken into account. | 20 |
Mixed objective/subjective test | A33 A34 A35 A39 A42 B2 B3 B4 B8 B9 C1 | The specific and precise answers will be valued, as well the degree of correction as required in each question, and the clarity in the exposition. It includes contents of laboratory practices, readings and the master session. It will be individual tests. | 40 |
Supervised projects | A38 A39 A40 A41 A42 B1 B2 B3 B5 B8 B9 B10 B11 B12 B15 B21 B22 B23 B24 B25 C1 C3 C4 C6 C8 | The degree of achievement of the objectives will be assessed in compliance with the teaching guidelines, the rigor, the argumentation, the depth of the analysis of the proposed situations, and the clarity of the exhibition. It will be held in group and will be exhibited in the classroom in the last weeks of the course. |
40 |
Assessment comments | |||
Option A. Students who attend and participates in the 80% of interactive sessions: The final qualification will be a result of the results obtained in the following paragraphs: Laboratory practices: 20% Mixed test: 40% Supervised work: 40% Depending on the demands and capacity of entities external to the UDC to host students, some groups of students may, if they prefer, replace the realization of the work supervised by a Learning and Service project (ApS). This ApS will focus on the subject matter and will be carried out in a group, in the same way with the protected work. A written report will be submitted, and a presentation will be made in the classroom, combining the use of ICT courses with oral exposure. There will be at least one follow-up tutoring in which the group must orally expose the progress up to that time and the lines of discontinuity, in addition to a written script. The weight in the planning and evaluation system of the subject will be the same as that of the supervised work (40%). It is not guaranteed that all students who wish can choose to do the work of APS, because the offer of places is conditioned by the capacity of the choice and the needs of the entities external to the UDC. Each activity and each section will be classified on a scale of 0 to 10. Those laboratory practices which are evaluated and to which To pass the subject, the student must reach a minimum of
Option B. Students who do not attend or do not participate in the 80% of the interactive sessions: In this case the evaluation will not be as in the previous case, but the mixed test will constitute 100% of the final qualification. However, those students can choose, if they prefer, to join a working group, consisting indifferently of assistant or non-assistant students, and carry out the supervised work (or the ApS if they wish and it is possible). In this case, the qualification of the supervised work (or ApS) will mean the 20% of the final grade and the final mixed test 80%, provided that both parts have a rating not less than 5 out of 10. Otherwise, the final grade will be the one corresponding to the failed part.. In the 2nd call or retake (June-July), only those section which were failed in the 1st call (May-June) will be retaken and the final qualification will be calculated in an analogous way. That is, with the weighted average following the same percentages in case the student passed the 3 sections, and with the note corresponding to the failed section otherwise. For all students in general: Each student must place a photo on their Moodle user profile that identifies them. The typos in the manuscripts and materials submitted will reduce the final score. In the evaluation materials to be submitted, the contents must be appropriately referenced throughout the work and in the reference section using certain rules. The text must be declared using these rules. In the paraphrase must include the original sources of the ideas that are reworked. The presence of scientific sources at work is a sign of credibility that is an essential requirement to demonstrate academic excellence. It is recommended to consult:https://www.udc.es/gl/library/services/apoio_investigacion/servizos_apoio/index.html Plagiarism must be avoided. The amendment to article 11, section 4 b) of the UDC Student Disciplinary Regulations, approved by the Governing Council, will apply, according to which the quotations and references to any text must be declared, and the literal use of the text or paraphrased ideas of other authors without declaring the source, implies: A failing grade in the call in which the fault is committed and with respect to the subject in which it was committed: the student will be qualified with "failing grade" (numerical grade 0) in the corresponding call of the academic year, whether the commission of the fault occurs in the first callas in the second. For this, the grade will be modified in the first call report, if necessary. |
|