Teaching GuideTerm
Faculty of Educational Studies
  Home | galego | castellano | english | A A |  
Grao en Educación Social
 Subjects
  Communication and Cooperation in Socio-Educational Action
   Assessment
Methodologies Competencies Description Qualification
Supervised projects A5 A7 A9 A10 A12 A14 A17 A18 A20 B3 B4 B5 B6 C1 C4 C6 These projects will be initiated in the classroom by the students and completed autonomously if necessary. Their content will be evaluated taking into consideration the following criteria, among others:

- Structure: Careful presentation (respecting the established format), organisation of the content, clarity of exposition and grammatical correctness.
- Degree of understanding of the basic ideas of the subject.
- Conceptual mastery and appropriate use of the vocabulary of the subject.
- Use of varied bibliographical sources and correct citation of sources.
- Ability to relate the contents to each other and to other material consulted.
- Coherence between the different sections.
- Degree of depth in each of the sections and relationship with what has been covered in the classroom.
15
Mixed objective/subjective test A5 A8 A10 A11 A14 A17 B1 B5 B6 C1 C4 C6 In the mixed objective/subjective test, students will have to answer several questions that will involve a global and integrated treatment of the contents dealt with throughout the subject, and will therefore be made up of both closed and open questions. The latter will be of a brief nature and the ability to both specify and synthesise and to relate to the contents analysed, both in the expository and interactive sessions, will be especially valued. The organisation of the information, coherence and comprehension of the contents will also be assessed. 50
Student portfolio A5 A7 A8 A9 A10 A14 A17 A18 A20 B1 B3 B4 B5 B6 C1 C4 C6 The student's portfolio will be evaluated in relation to the content, using the following evaluation criteria, among others:

- Structure: Careful presentation (respecting the established format), organisation of the content, clarity of exposition and grammatical correctness.
- Degree of understanding of the basic ideas of the subject.
- Conceptual mastery and appropriate use of the vocabulary of the subject.
- Use of varied bibliographical sources and correct citation of sources.
- Ability to relate the contents to each other and to other material consulted.
- Coherence between the different sections.
- Degree of depth in each of the sections and relationship with what was covered in the classroom.

It will be essential that the students deliver all the tasks (individual and group) included in the portfolio. Otherwise, you will not be able to pass the subject.
25
Oral presentation A7 A10 A11 A12 A14 A17 A20 B1 B5 B6 C1 C4 C6 With regard to classroom presentations by students, the following will be taken into consideration when assessing:

- Relevance, pertinence and coherent organisation of the content presented.
- Use of audio-visual aids or other resources that facilitate the audience to follow the discourse.
- Level of group coordination (in-group presentations).
- Level of understanding of the basic contents of the subject and ability to express them coherently.
- Clarity of exposition.
10
 
Assessment comments

In order to pass the subject,
it will be necessary to achieve at least 5 points out of 10 in each of the
above elements (average of all the tutored work (including oral presentations); portfolio and mixed test).
If this score is not reached in each and every one of the required evaluation
evidences, the student will not pass the subject.

In relation to the plagiarism of the assessment evidences, the qualification will be
in accordance with the provisions of article 14. 4. of the Rules for
assessment, review and claiming of qualifications in university degree and
master's degree studies: "In the performance of work, the plagiarism and
use of non-original material, including that obtained through the internet,
without express indication of its origin and, if applicable, permission of
its author, may be considered a cause for failing the activity. All of this
without prejudice to the disciplinary responsibilities that may arise after
the corresponding procedure".

Fraudulent performance of tests or evaluation activities, once verified, will directly result in the qualification of suspension in the call in which it is committed: student will be graded with "fail" (numerical grade 0) in the corresponding call of the academic year, whether the offense is committed on the first opportunity or on the second. To do this, her rating will be modified in the first opportunity report, if necessary. We thus comply with the provisions of article 11, section 4 b), of the Disciplinary Regulations for UDC Students.

Students who have the
recognition of academic dispensation, as established in the "Norma que
regula o réxime de dedicación ao estudo dos estudantes de grao na UDC" (Articles
3ºb and 4º.5) of 29/05./2012 and in the "Normas de avaliación, revisión
e reclamación das cualificacións dos estudos de grao e mestrado
universitario" (Articles 3º and 8ºb) of 28/09/2016, may perform a
non-attendance monitoring of the subject using Moodle. He/she must also carry
out all the evidences mentioned above (supervised projects, student's portfolio and
mixed objective/subjective test), on an individual basis or in a non-attendance group. In addition, they must also
respect the deadlines proposed for the assisting students in each of the supervised projects, thus keeping a continuous monitoring of the subject.
Otherwise, the work will appear as not submitted, the same as the
qualification obtained in the subject.

It is understood that
university students have assumed linguistic skills in relation to oral and
written expression. Therefore, spelling (spelling, accentuation and
punctuation), grammatical and lexical correctness in work and exams is
essential and compulsory in order to pass the subject.

The full integration of
students who, due to physical, sensory, mental or socio-cultural reasons,
experience difficulties in gaining adequate, equal and beneficial access to
university life will be facilitated.

As stated in the different regulations for university teaching, we incorporate the gender perspective in this subject, so non-sexist language must be used, bibliography by authors of both sexes should be used, students should be encouraged to participate in the classroom, among other actions to promote equality. In addition, work will be done to identify and modify prejudices and sexist attitudes and influence the environment to modify them and promote values of respect and equality. They will try to detect situations of discrimination based on gender and will propose actions and measures to correct them.

This being said, it is worth
mentioning that the evaluation contemplates two options depending on the
level of attendance:

Option A. Aimed at students who
attend/participate in class activities on a regular basis (minimum required
attendance of 80%):

- Tutored projects (individual or in small groups): 15% of the final grade.

- Portfolio: 25% of the final grade.

- Oral presentations: 10% of the final grade.

- Mixed test on the contents of
the subject: 50% of the final grade.

Option B. Aimed at those
students who do not attend/participate in class activities in the normal way
(attendance below 80%):

- Tutored projects (individual or in small groups): 20% of the final grade.

- Pportfolio: 30% of the final grade.

- Mixed test on the contents of
the subject: 50% of the final grade.

Universidade da Coruña - Rúa Maestranza 9, 15001 A Coruña - Tel. +34 981 16 70 00  Soporte Guías Docentes