The rating is the sum of the following contributions:

- Mixed objective: up to 60 points 

- Objective tests: up to 25 points

- problem solving and workshops: up to 15 points. Although responses to pre-test the theoretical sessions are not part of the assessment of the matter, they are considered an essential tool in the teaching methodology designed. Consequently, those students who do not meet any test, or do so in a grossly negligent manner, will not be evaluated in classes problem solving or related workshops.

To pass the subject it will be necessary to get at least 50 points between the different assessment activities (mixed testing, objective testing, troubleshooting and workshops) and obtain a minimum score of 30 points (out of 60) in the mixed test in the firts and second oportunity. If is not possible to achieve the minimum score in the mixed test, although the average be greater than or equal to 50 points (out of 100) will be listed as not passing matter (4.5).

Since the rating is based on the model of continuous assessment, specifically assess student progression throughout the semester could be added maximum of 1 point to the final grade.

Students who do not participate in workshops and problem solvent will score zero points in this section on two occasions or oportunities.

The student will have a rating of not submitted when making less than 25% of academic activities scheduled and is not presented at the mixed objective.

Students to be evaluated in the so-called "second chance" can only obtain qualified with the maximun if the maximum number of these to the corresponding course was not fully covered in the "first chance."

In the case of exceptional circumstances objectivables and properly justified, the professor may waive in whole or in part the student for the continuous process. People in this circumstance must pass a specific test that leaves no doubt on the achievement of the competences of the subject.

For students with a part-time commitment and academic exemption for attendance exemption, the assessment obtained in the activities associated with the personalized tutoring system will correspond to the evaluation of the objective test methodology, that is to say with 25% of the final score. The remaining 75% of said final grade will be determined through the results obtained by the student in the mixed objective.

With regard to successive academic courses, the teaching-learning process, including evaluation, refers to an academic course, and would therefore begin again with a new course, including all evaluation activities and procedures programmed for that course.