Teaching GuideTerm
Higher Technical University College of Architecture
  Home | galego | castellano | english | A A |  
Grao en Estudos de Arquitectura
 Subjects
  Landscape and Sustainable Habitat
   Assessment
Methodologies Competencies Description Qualification
Collaborative learning A59 A57 A54 A47 A46 A45 A44 A41 A39 A37 A36 A35 A34 A20 A19 A17 B3 B4 B5 B6 B8 C1 C4 C5 C6 Evaluation of the project. A rubric will be used to evaluate the degree of achievement of the proposed objectives, in terms of the social need met, the skills acquired by students, their active participation and the dynamics of collaboration with the participating entities, dissemination. and projection, etc ... The implication and participation in the activities, the fulfillment of the deliveries and the quality of the elaborated material will be valued. 90
Events academic / information C4 C5 C7 Preparation of material summarize the coursework for the end of year exhibition organized by the Department of Architectural Projects, Urban Planning and Composition: "Architectures in Course. DPAUC" (panels, models, drawings, videos, texts, performances , etc.).
10
 
Assessment comments

In the general evaluation of the course, the following aspects will be valued: attendance and participation in class and workshops and activities

- Class attendance: minimum 80% of expositive sessions and 80% of interactive sessions. In addition, the teaching staff will assess whether attendance is active by participating in the expository sessions (answering questions), in team or individual corrections. Active participation may be valued as an increase in the final grade.

The grade of the first opportunity will be "Not Presented" if you have not delivered any of the mandatory items. However, active participation in class, during the school period, that demonstrate adequate knowledge of the contents of the subject may be valued by the teaching staff.

For students with recognition of part-time dedication according to the "Norm that regulates the regime of dedication to the study of undergraduate students at the UDC" the minimum class attendance will be 50%, both in the interactive sessions and in the expository ones . The rest of the evaluation elements will be the same as in the general case. In relation to the final test, what is described in article 12 of the "Rules of Evaluation, Review and Complaint of the Qualifications of the Degree Studies and University Master of the UDC" (consolidated version 2017) will be followed.

Academic waiver: it is not contemplated, as it is a subject in which the workshop is the fundamental methodology.

The detection of plagiarism, as well as the fraudulent performance of tests or evaluation activities, once verified, will directly imply the grade of failing "0" in the subject in the corresponding call, thus invalidating any grade obtained in all evaluation activities. ahead of the extraordinary call.

Second opportunity:

In order to pass the subject on a second opportunity, it is necessary to repeat the evaluable items in which the pass was not achieved.

The tutored works would be re-elaborated, corrected or completed according to the indications of the tutors of the matter. For this, it is recommended that the teams make use of academic tutorials with their corresponding tutors during the second semester. The works will be delivered, at most, up to a week before the second chance exam.

Students who have not met the minimum attendance during the school period will not be eligible for a positive evaluation.

For everything else, the evaluation criteria for the second chance will be the same as for the first

Universidade da Coruña - Rúa Maestranza 9, 15001 A Coruña - Tel. +34 981 16 70 00  Soporte Guías Docentes