Teaching GuideTerm
Faculty of Educational Studies
  Home | galego | castellano | english | A A |  
Mestrado Universitario en Psicoloxía Aplicada
 Subjects
  Psychological well-being
   Assessment
Methodologies Competencies Description Qualification
Supervised projects B1 B2 B3 B6 B8 C7 C8 The students will have to work on the development of activities that, based on the knowledge previously acquired in the development of the subject, have the ultimate goal of measuring, analyzing or improving the psychological well-being of people 20
Critical bibliographical B1 B2 B6 B8 An applied deepening work will be carried out following the teacher's instructions. 20
Document analysis B1 B2 B6 B12 C6 The critical and reasoned participation of the students in relation to the analysis of the sources that the teacher offers as basic bibliography will be valued. 10
Directed discussion B1 B3 B6 B8 C4 The contributions that students make based on the knowledge acquired through reading the bibliography offered will be valued. 10
Short answer questions B1 B6 B8 The students will have to take a short answer exam on the contents covered in the lecture sessions 40
 
Assessment comments

For students attending the subject (> 80% of the sessions), the exam (short answer test) will compute 40% of the total evaluation. The supervised works, reviews, discussions and analysis of documentary sources will constitute the remaining 30% of the final grade.

In the case of students with with recognition of academic dispensation, the exam (short answer test) will constitute 100% of the grade. In this compulsory exam, not only the contents covered in the lectures will enter, but also those developed in the supervised works, reviews, discussions and analysis of documentary sources that have been raised throughout the course.

ADDITIONAL REMARKS:

1. To pass the subject it is necessary to obtain a score of 50% of the weight of each of the parts being evaluated (practical part and exam).

2. The July call will be subject to the same criteria as the May call.

3. As established in the "Standards for the assessment, review and claim of qualifications for two graduate studies and university studies" (approved on 12/19/2013 and modified on 04/30/2014) in Art. 21.2: It will be considered as “ Not presented ”(NP) to that student who, being enrolled in the subject, does not attend the different evaluation activities established for the academic year.

Thus, it will be classified as "Not presented" when:

a) Do not complete the continuous evaluation process, under the conditions that appear in the teaching guide, or

b) Does not appear for the test of the official evaluation period.

4. Regarding the fraudulent performance (plagiarism) of the evaluation tests, the qualification will adjust to the provisions of article 14. 4. Norms for the assessment, review and claim of qualifications for two university graduate and graduate studies: " In the realization of works, plagiarism and the use of non-original material, including that obtained through the internet, without express indication of its origin and, if it is the case, without the permission of its author, may be considered cause of qualification of failure in the activity. All this without prejudice to the disciplinary responsibilities to which there could be place after the corresponding procedure ". In accordance with this rule, the fraudulent performance of any activity subject to evaluation will imply a rating of "0" (Failure) in the current call.

Universidade da Coruña - Rúa Maestranza 9, 15001 A Coruña - Tel. +34 981 16 70 00  Soporte Guías Docentes