Option
A. Students who attend and participates in the 80% of interactive sessions:

The final qualification will be a
result of the results obtained in the following paragraphs:

Laboratory practices: 20%

Mixed test: 40%

Supervised work: 40%

Depending on the demands and capacity of entities
external to the UDC to host students, some groups of students may, if they
prefer, replace the realization of the work supervised by a Learning and
Service project (ApS). This ApS will focus on the subject matter and will be
carried out in a group, in the same way with the protected work. A written report
will be submitted,  and a presentation
will be made in the classroom, combining the use of ICT courses with oral
exposure.



There will be at least one follow-up tutoring in which
the group must orally expose the progress up to that time and the lines of
discontinuity, in addition to a written script.

The weight in the planning and evaluation system of the subject will be the same as that of the supervised work (40%).

It is not guaranteed that all students who wish can
choose to do the work of APS, because the offer of places is conditioned by the
capacity of the choice and the needs of the entities external to the UDC.

Each activity and each section will be classified on a
scale of 0 to 10.

Those laboratory practices which are evaluated and to which
the student does not attended, will be qualified with 0 in the calculation of
the average of this section.

In this case the evaluation will not be as in the previous case, but the mixed
test will constitute 100% of the final qualification.

However, those students can choose, if they prefer, to
join a working group, consisting indifferently of assistant or non-assistant
students, and carry out the supervised work (or the ApS if they wish and  it is possible). In this case, the
qualification of the supervised work (or ApS) will mean the 20% of the final grade
and the final mixed test 80%, provided that both parts have a rating not less
than 5 out of 10.

Otherwise, the final grade will be the one corresponding
to the failed part..

In the 2nd call or retake (June-July), only
those section which were failed in the 1st call (May-June) will be retaken and
the final qualification will be calculated in an analogous way. That is, with
the weighted average following the same percentages in case the student passed
the 3 sections, and with the note corresponding to the failed section
otherwise. 

For all students in general: 

Each student must place a photo on their Moodle user profile that identifies
them. 

The typos in the manuscripts and materials submitted will
reduce the final score. 

 In the evaluation materials to be submitted, the contents
must be appropriately referenced throughout the work and in the reference
section using certain rules. The text must be declared using these rules. In
the paraphrase must include the original sources of the ideas that are
reworked. The presence of scientific sources at work is a sign of credibility
that is an essential requirement to demonstrate academic excellence. It is
recommended to
consult:https://www.udc.es/gl/library/services/apoio_investigacion/servizos_apoio/index.html 

Plagiarism must be avoided. Citations and references to
any text must be declared, the literal use of the text or ideas of other
authors paraphrased without declaring the source implies the suspension of the
work in application of article 14.4 of the Rules of Evaluation, Review and
Claim of qualifications of the University Degree and Master's Studies, approved
by the Governing Council of 19 December 2013 and modified on 29 June 2017,  "In the carrying out of works,
plagiarism and the use of non-original material, including that obtained
through the Internet, without express indication of its origin and, where
appropriate, the permission of its author, may be considered a cause of
qualification of fail in the activity".