Teaching GuideTerm
Higher Polytechnic University College
  Home | galego | castellano | english | A A |  
Máster Universitario en Eficiencia Enerxética e Sustentabilidade
 Subjects
  Evaluation and Optimization of the Energy System Sustainability
   Assessment
Methodologies Competencies Description Qualification
Objective test A4 B1 B2 B3 B6 B7 B10 B16 C2 C3 C4 See what has been said in this regard in the section on Methodologies. 40
Case study A4 B1 B2 B3 B6 B7 B10 B16 C2 C3 C4 See what has been said in this regard in the section on Methodologies. 60
 
Assessment comments
In order to solve the problems of students with academic dispensation, or with coinciding class schedules, or with other problems that prevent attendance at class, such attendance is not compulsory.

However, it is a fact that the probability of passing the subject and of obtaining a high grade increase with attendance and, therefore, attendance is recommended.

There will be two types of coursework, one or more will be compulsory, and one will be optional. Compulsory coursework will account for 80% of the overall coursework grade, and optional coursework will account for the rest. In order to pass the subject, it is enough for students to carry out the compulsory work, and passing the corresponding defence. 

In situations where face-to-face teaching is not possible or recommendable, the coursework supervision will be carried out online.

Part of the compulsory work will be carried out during class time, with the support of the teacher. Students who do not attend class must also do these works, consulting their doubts with the teacher.

In order to overcome this defence, the teachers will ask the student questions, and the student will have to demonstrate that she/he has the necessary theoretical knowledge to really know what she/he has done with the computer during the development of the aforementioned work, and to interpret the results to which she/he has arrived. These questions may be asked either orally or in writing. In situations where face-to-face evaluation is not possible or recommendable, these questions will be asked online.

Student responsibilities. The difference between distance Universities (e.g., the UNED; the Open University) and the rest of Universities is that, in the first ones, the University is responsible for contacting the students and providing them with all the materials necessary for passing the subject, by studying those materials. That is not the case of the rest of Universities, such as the UDC, in which the student is responsible for contacting the professors; downloading the materials contained in Moodle and working with them; attending the classes and taking notes on what it said by the professors; following the written and verbal instructions of the professor; and studying all the materials referred to, in order to pass the subject. The students who do not attend some classes (including the ones with exemption for attending the classes), have the same responsibilities as the rest of students, although in this case, since they are not attending the classes, they are responsible for getting in touch with peers and professors, aiming to collect all the teaching material that has been alluded.

The basic correction criteria are as follows:
The score will be null if the answer or result of the calculation:
- Include a misconception.
- Do not include adequate justification of the decision taken or, in general, of the response requested (if such justification is requested).
- Or they do not respect any of the essential requirements that the statement has established.
- In the case of numerical results, if the result requested does not coincide with the one to be obtained (leaving possible rounding differences to the margin), or if the necessary detail of the operations carried out is not included, or if the calculation computer file used to carry out the exercise is not included.

If the wording carried out by the student is not clear, can not be understood or is grammatically incorrect, the grade may even go down to zero points, if this wording is impossible to understand, or may give rise to misunderstandings, or may lead to the non-compliance of any of the essential requirements that the statement has established. Bear in mind that one of the missions of a graduate of this Master is to generate designs and give written orders for the appropriate work to be carried out; this implies the need to write correctly. It is key to generate documents that are easily intelligible, so that the other stakeholders could understand what is happening or what they have to do. This includes, among other things, that the student must write with correct spelling and syntax, and must always use the appropriate technical language, and not a colloquial one.

In accordance with the UDC's internal policies and guidelines, work that is likely to lead to this problem will be analysed by means of an anti-plagiarism system. Software of this type does not work intelligently (e.g. it may consider the student's name or affiliation as plagiarism) and, therefore, the professor will evaluate the results of the analysis with due caution. Bearing this problem in mind, in general, any work with more than 25% of text considered as plagiarism by the software will not be accepted. It will be returned to the student, who will have to submit it with the problem solved at the next opportunity or, if it is the second opportunity, in the following course.

The evaluation criteria are the same for the first and the second opportunity.

In the event that the student applies for an early exam session, he/she must fulfil the same requirements as the other students, with sufficient time in advance to be eligible for this right, notifying the teacher sufficiently in advance so that he/she can make the necessary arrangements.

In any case, always developing the topics to be taught and, therefore, fulfilling the teaching assignment within the framework established by the number of credits of the subject, the teacher has the right to Academic Freedom, as recognized by the Spanish Constitution, the Spanish Constitutional Court, the Spanish Organic Law of Universities, the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, and UNESCO. Obviously, the teacher must always act within the law, and must teach modern, current, and correct contents covering the entire scope defined by the curriculum.

The Spanish Constitution (Art. 20) establishes respect for the Academic Freedom which, in its different definitions (e.g., Real Academia Española and Consejo General del Poder Judicial; https://dej.rae.es), implies the possibility of the professor to explain the subject in accordance with his or her own convictions, complying with the established syllabuses, and within the framework of the institutions responsible for organizing education, as long as they adequately exercise the corresponding responsibility. At the same time, Castillo Córdova (2006) includes in the Academic Freedom the faculty to choose the methodology that the professor considers most appropriate to transmit the knowledge.

The latter means that the aspects of this guide corresponding to the teaching methods to be used, and the percentage of hours to be devoted to each of them, are merely tentative, for guidance, and the teacher will be able to make changes if he / she considers it positive, being able to investigate whether there are better methodological approaches for teaching, such as some of those proposed in scientific literature or in specialized monographs on the subject (Felder and Brent, 2016), and always in favour of academic results.

All of the above explained with respect to teaching methodologies will never negatively affect the mode of evaluation, in which the student will always be able to obtain the maximum grade regardless of his or her personal circumstances, in accordance with what is established in this evaluation section.


References
- Castillo Córdova, Luis (2006). Libertad de Cátedra en la relación laboral con ideario. Valencia: Tirant lo Blanch. ISBN: 9788484565567
- Felder, RM, Brent, R (2016), Teaching and learning STEM. USA: Jossey-Bass (Wiley).
Universidade da Coruña - Rúa Maestranza 9, 15001 A Coruña - Tel. +34 981 16 70 00  Soporte Guías Docentes